SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach called "SafeDecoding" to defend against "jailbreak attacks" on large language models (LLMs).
- Jailbreak attacks are a type of security vulnerability where an AI system is prompted to generate harmful or unintended outputs, bypassing the system's safety mechanisms.
- The SafeDecoding method aims to make LLMs more robust against such attacks by incorporating safety considerations directly into the decoding process.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a very smart virtual assistant that can help you with all kinds of tasks. But sometimes, a sneaky person might try to trick the assistant into doing or saying something harmful or inappropriate. This is called a "jailbreak attack."
The researchers in this paper have developed a new way to make the virtual assistant more secure against these kinds of attacks. They call their approach "SafeDecoding." The key idea is to build in safety checks directly into how the assistant generates its responses, so that even if someone tries to trick it, the assistant will still stick to safe and appropriate outputs.
This is an important problem to solve, because as AI systems become more powerful, it's crucial to make sure they can't be easily manipulated to cause harm. By making LLMs more robust against jailbreak attacks, the SafeDecoding method helps ensure these AI systems remain safe and trustworthy as they become more widely used.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the SafeDecoding method, which aims to defend against jailbreak attacks on large language models (LLMs) by incorporating safety considerations directly into the decoding process. [This builds on previous work on defending against jailbreak attacks, such as the approaches described in the papers "Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attacks Versus Defense for Large Language Models" and "Jailbreaking the Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs: A Simple Adaptive Approach."]
The key idea behind SafeDecoding is to modify the standard beam search decoding algorithm used by LLMs to generate text. Specifically, the authors propose adding a "safety score" to the decoding process, which evaluates the safety and appropriateness of each candidate token based on a set of pre-defined safety criteria. This safety score is then used to bias the decoding towards safer and more aligned outputs.
The authors evaluate SafeDecoding on a suite of jailbreak attack benchmarks and show that it is effective at defending against a wide range of such attacks, while maintaining the LLM's performance on standard language modeling tasks. [This builds on previous work on defending against jailbreak attacks, such as the approaches described in the papers "Defending LLMs Against Jailbreaking Attacks via Backtranslation" and "Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks."]
Critical Analysis
The SafeDecoding approach represents a promising step forward in making LLMs more robust against jailbreak attacks. By incorporating safety considerations directly into the decoding process, the method aims to provide a more comprehensive defense than approaches that rely on separate safety filters or post-processing steps.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the current approach. For example, the safety criteria used to evaluate candidate tokens may not capture all possible ways in which an LLM could be prompted to generate harmful outputs. [As discussed in the paper "GradSafe: Detecting Jailbreak Prompts in LLMs via Safety Gradients," this is an area that requires further research.]
Additionally, the authors note that the SafeDecoding approach may come with a computational cost, as the additional safety scoring and decoding steps could slow down the LLM's response time. This is an important consideration, especially for applications where real-time performance is crucial.
Overall, the SafeDecoding method represents a significant contribution to the ongoing efforts to make LLMs more secure and trustworthy. While it may not be a complete solution, it provides a valuable framework for incorporating safety into the core functionality of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The SafeDecoding paper presents a novel approach to defending large language models against jailbreak attacks, a critical security vulnerability that could allow these systems to be manipulated to generate harmful or inappropriate outputs. By incorporating safety considerations directly into the decoding process, the method aims to make LLMs more robust and aligned with intended functionality.
While the approach has some limitations and areas for further research, it represents an important step forward in ensuring the safety and trustworthiness of these increasingly powerful AI systems. As LLMs become more widely deployed in real-world applications, the need for such security measures will only grow more pressing. The insights and techniques developed in this paper could help pave the way for a new generation of AI systems that are both capable and safe.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding
Zhangchen Xu, Fengqing Jiang, Luyao Niu, Jinyuan Jia, Bill Yuchen Lin, Radha Poovendran
As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into real-world applications such as code generation and chatbot assistance, extensive efforts have been made to align LLM behavior with human values, including safety. Jailbreak attacks, aiming to provoke unintended and unsafe behaviors from LLMs, remain a significant/leading LLM safety threat. In this paper, we aim to defend LLMs against jailbreak attacks by introducing SafeDecoding, a safety-aware decoding strategy for LLMs to generate helpful and harmless responses to user queries. Our insight in developing SafeDecoding is based on the observation that, even though probabilities of tokens representing harmful contents outweigh those representing harmless responses, safety disclaimers still appear among the top tokens after sorting tokens by probability in descending order. This allows us to mitigate jailbreak attacks by identifying safety disclaimers and amplifying their token probabilities, while simultaneously attenuating the probabilities of token sequences that are aligned with the objectives of jailbreak attacks. We perform extensive experiments on five LLMs using six state-of-the-art jailbreak attacks and four benchmark datasets. Our results show that SafeDecoding significantly reduces the attack success rate and harmfulness of jailbreak attacks without compromising the helpfulness of responses to benign user queries. SafeDecoding outperforms six defense methods.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generation
Haoyu Wang, Bingzhe Wu, Yatao Bian, Yongzhe Chang, Xueqian Wang, Peilin Zhao
Large Language Models (LLMs) are implicit troublemakers. While they provide valuable insights and assist in problem-solving, they can also potentially serve as a resource for malicious activities. Implementing safety alignment could mitigate the risk of LLMs generating harmful responses. We argue that: even when an LLM appears to successfully block harmful queries, there may still be hidden vulnerabilities that could act as ticking time bombs. To identify these underlying weaknesses, we propose to use a cost value model as both a detector and an attacker. Trained on external or self-generated harmful datasets, the cost value model could successfully influence the original safe LLM to output toxic content in decoding process. For instance, LLaMA-2-chat 7B outputs 39.18% concrete toxic content, along with only 22.16% refusals without any harmful suffixes. These potential weaknesses can then be exploited via prompt optimization such as soft prompts on images. We name this decoding strategy: Jailbreak Value Decoding (JVD), emphasizing that seemingly secure LLMs may not be as safe as we initially believe. They could be used to gather harmful data or launch covert attacks.
Read more8/27/2024
🌿
0
SafeAligner: Safety Alignment against Jailbreak Attacks via Response Disparity Guidance
Caishuang Huang, Wanxu Zhao, Rui Zheng, Huijie Lv, Shihan Dou, Sixian Li, Xiao Wang, Enyu Zhou, Junjie Ye, Yuming Yang, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
As the development of large language models (LLMs) rapidly advances, securing these models effectively without compromising their utility has become a pivotal area of research. However, current defense strategies against jailbreak attacks (i.e., efforts to bypass security protocols) often suffer from limited adaptability, restricted general capability, and high cost. To address these challenges, we introduce SafeAligner, a methodology implemented at the decoding stage to fortify defenses against jailbreak attacks. We begin by developing two specialized models: the Sentinel Model, which is trained to foster safety, and the Intruder Model, designed to generate riskier responses. SafeAligner leverages the disparity in security levels between the responses from these models to differentiate between harmful and beneficial tokens, effectively guiding the safety alignment by altering the output token distribution of the target model. Extensive experiments show that SafeAligner can increase the likelihood of beneficial tokens, while reducing the occurrence of harmful ones, thereby ensuring secure alignment with minimal loss to generality.
Read more7/1/2024
🌐
0
Safe Unlearning: A Surprisingly Effective and Generalizable Solution to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks
Zhexin Zhang, Junxiao Yang, Pei Ke, Shiyao Cui, Chujie Zheng, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
LLMs are known to be vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, even after safety alignment. An important observation is that, while different types of jailbreak attacks can generate significantly different queries, they mostly result in similar responses that are rooted in the same harmful knowledge (e.g., detailed steps to make a bomb). Therefore, we conjecture that directly unlearn the harmful knowledge in the LLM can be a more effective way to defend against jailbreak attacks than the mainstream supervised fine-tuning (SFT) based approaches. Our extensive experiments confirmed our insight and suggested surprising generalizability of our unlearning-based approach: using only 20 raw harmful questions emph{without} any jailbreak prompt during training, our solution reduced the Attack Success Rate (ASR) in Vicuna-7B on emph{out-of-distribution} (OOD) harmful questions wrapped with various complex jailbreak prompts from 82.6% to 7.7%. This significantly outperforms Llama2-7B-Chat, which is fine-tuned on about 0.1M safety alignment samples but still has an ASR of 21.9% even under the help of an additional safety system prompt. Further analysis reveals that the generalization ability of our solution stems from the intrinsic relatedness among harmful responses across harmful questions (e.g., response patterns, shared steps and actions, and similarity among their learned representations in the LLM). Our code is available at url{https://github.com/thu-coai/SafeUnlearning}.
Read more7/4/2024