SAMM: Sharded Automated Market Makers

Overview

• This paper proposes a new automated market maker (AMM) design called Sharded Automated Market Makers (SAMM) that aims to improve upon existing AMMs like ZeroSwap, Saddle, and Uniswap.
• SAMM uses sharding to split the liquidity pool into smaller, independent pools, which can reduce slippage and improve capital efficiency.
• The paper analyzes SAMM's performance and compares it to other AMM designs through theoretical analysis and simulations.

Plain English Explanation

Automated market makers (AMMs) are a key component of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols that allow users to trade cryptocurrencies without an order book. However, existing AMMs like Uniswap and Saddle can suffer from high slippage (the difference between the expected and actual price of a trade) and inefficient use of capital.

The SAMM design proposed in this paper aims to address these issues by splitting the liquidity pool into smaller, independent "shards". This allows trades to be executed against the shard with the lowest slippage, potentially reducing the overall slippage experienced by users. Additionally, the sharded design can improve capital efficiency, as liquidity providers don't need to contribute to all trading pairs.

The researchers analyze SAMM's performance through theoretical modeling and simulations, and compare it to other AMM designs. The results suggest that SAMM can outperform existing AMMs in terms of slippage and capital efficiency, making it a promising option for DeFi protocols.

Technical Explanation

The SAMM design splits the liquidity pool into multiple independent "shards", each of which maintains its own set of trading pairs and liquidity. When a user wants to make a trade, the SAMM protocol routes the trade to the shard with the lowest slippage for that particular trade.

The paper provides a formal model of the SAMM design and analyzes its properties, including the optimal shard allocation, slippage bounds, and capital efficiency. The researchers also compare SAMM to other AMM designs, such as Uniswap, Saddle, and ZeroSwap, through theoretical analysis and simulations.

The key findings of the paper include:

• SAMM can achieve lower slippage than other AMM designs by routing trades to the shard with the lowest slippage.
• SAMM can improve capital efficiency by allowing liquidity providers to contribute to only the trading pairs they are interested in, rather than the entire pool.
• The optimal shard allocation can be determined based on factors such as trade volume and price volatility.
• SAMM's performance advantages are demonstrated through both theoretical analysis and simulations.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed and thorough analysis of the SAMM design, including its formal modeling, theoretical properties, and performance comparisons to other AMMs. The researchers have clearly put significant effort into understanding the trade-offs and design choices involved in the SAMM approach.

One potential limitation of the SAMM design is the complexity introduced by the sharding mechanism. While the sharding can improve slippage and capital efficiency, it may also add overhead in terms of transaction processing and liquidity management. The paper does not fully address how this complexity would be handled in a real-world deployment.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the theoretical and simulation-based analysis of SAMM, without providing insights from real-world user or market data. Validating the SAMM approach with empirical evidence from a production deployment would further strengthen the research.

Finally, the paper does not discuss the potential security implications of the SAMM design, such as the risks of shard isolation or cross-shard attacks. Addressing these types of concerns would be important for the real-world viability of the SAMM approach.

Conclusion

The SAMM design proposed in this paper represents a promising advancement in the field of automated market makers for decentralized finance. By leveraging sharding to split the liquidity pool, SAMM can potentially achieve lower slippage and improved capital efficiency compared to existing AMM designs.

The paper's theoretical analysis and simulations provide a strong foundation for the SAMM approach, but further research and real-world validation would be needed to fully assess its practical feasibility and deployment challenges. Nonetheless, the SAMM design is a thought-provoking contribution to the ongoing efforts to improve the performance and user experience of DeFi protocols.