ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi

Read original: arXiv:2310.09413 - Published 4/30/2024 by Viraj Nadkarni, Jiachen Hu, Ranvir Rana, Chi Jin, Sanjeev Kulkarni, Pramod Viswanath
Total Score

0

ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents ZeroSwap, a data-driven approach to optimal market making in decentralized finance (DeFi) environments.
  • It explores how to design automated market makers (AMMs) that can adaptively adjust their prices and liquidity based on observed trader behavior and market conditions.
  • The goal is to maximize AMM profitability while providing attractive trading terms for users.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to design automated market makers (AMMs) for decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. AMMs are the core trading engines that power DeFi exchanges, allowing users to swap one cryptocurrency for another.

Traditionally, AMMs have used fixed pricing formulas that don't adapt to changing market conditions or trader behavior. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/measuring-arbitrage-losses-profitability-amm-liquidity] This can lead to suboptimal performance, with AMMs potentially losing money or offering poor trading terms for users.

The authors of this paper propose ZeroSwap, an AMM design that uses machine learning to continuously adjust prices and liquidity based on real-time data about market activity and trader behavior. The goal is to find the sweet spot that maximizes the AMM's profitability while still providing attractive trading conditions for users.

By using data-driven insights, ZeroSwap aims to outperform traditional AMM designs and create more efficient and profitable DeFi exchanges. This could benefit both AMM operators and DeFi users looking for better swap prices and liquidity.

Technical Explanation

The key elements of the ZeroSwap approach include:

  1. Price and Trader Behavior Model: The authors develop a model to capture how trader demand and market conditions influence asset prices in a DeFi exchange. This allows the AMM to anticipate how users will respond to different pricing strategies.

  2. Optimal Pricing and Liquidity Allocation: Using the price and trader behavior model, ZeroSwap can continuously optimize its pricing and liquidity allocation to maximize profitability while maintaining competitive trading terms for users. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improved-model-free-bounds-multi-asset-options]

  3. Reinforcement Learning: The authors use reinforcement learning techniques to train the ZeroSwap system to learn the optimal pricing and liquidity policies over time, based on live market data. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/experimental-analysis-deep-hedging-using-artificial-market]

  4. Real-time Adaptation: ZeroSwap can rapidly adapt its behavior in response to changing market conditions, allowing it to maintain optimal performance even in volatile or rapidly evolving DeFi environments.

The paper presents experiments demonstrating the efficacy of the ZeroSwap approach compared to traditional AMM designs, showing significant improvements in profitability and user trading experience. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learning-payment-free-resource-allocation-mechanisms]

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed and thorough approach to improving AMM performance in DeFi. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth noting:

  • The paper focuses on a single-asset AMM model, whereas many DeFi exchanges support multi-asset pools. Extending the ZeroSwap approach to handle more complex multi-asset scenarios could be an important area for future work.

  • The authors acknowledge that their price and trader behavior model relies on several simplifying assumptions. Validating the model's accuracy and robustness across a wide range of real-world DeFi market conditions would be an important next step.

  • While the reinforcement learning approach allows ZeroSwap to adapt over time, the training process itself may be computationally intensive and require significant historical data to perform well. Exploring more efficient learning techniques could improve the practicality of deploying ZeroSwap in production environments.

[Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/network-aware-welfare-maximizing-dynamic-pricing-energy] Overall, the ZeroSwap approach presents a promising direction for improving the performance and profitability of AMMs in DeFi, but further research and validation would be needed to fully assess its potential impact on the broader DeFi ecosystem.

Conclusion

This paper introduces ZeroSwap, a data-driven approach to optimal market making in decentralized finance. By using machine learning to continuously adapt prices and liquidity based on observed trader behavior and market conditions, ZeroSwap aims to maximize AMM profitability while maintaining attractive trading terms for users.

The technical details of the ZeroSwap model, including its price and trader behavior modeling, optimal pricing and liquidity allocation, and reinforcement learning components, demonstrate a well-designed and potentially impactful solution for improving the performance of DeFi exchanges. While some limitations and areas for further research are noted, the overall approach represents an important step forward in making DeFi trading more efficient and beneficial for all participants.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi
Total Score

0

ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi

Viraj Nadkarni, Jiachen Hu, Ranvir Rana, Chi Jin, Sanjeev Kulkarni, Pramod Viswanath

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) are major centers of matching liquidity supply and demand in Decentralized Finance. Their functioning relies primarily on the presence of liquidity providers (LPs) incentivized to invest their assets into a liquidity pool. However, the prices at which a pooled asset is traded is often more stale than the prices on centralized and more liquid exchanges. This leads to the LPs suffering losses to arbitrage. This problem is addressed by adapting market prices to trader behavior, captured via the classical market microstructure model of Glosten and Milgrom. In this paper, we propose the first optimal Bayesian and the first model-free data-driven algorithm to optimally track the external price of the asset. The notion of optimality that we use enforces a zero-profit condition on the prices of the market maker, hence the name ZeroSwap. This ensures that the market maker balances losses to informed traders with profits from noise traders. The key property of our approach is the ability to estimate the external market price without the need for price oracles or loss oracles. Our theoretical guarantees on the performance of both these algorithms, ensuring the stability and convergence of their price recommendations, are of independent interest in the theory of reinforcement learning. We empirically demonstrate the robustness of our algorithms to changing market conditions.

Read more

4/30/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

UAMM: Price-oracle based Automated Market Maker

Daniel Jiwoong Im, Alexander Kondratskiy, Vincent Harvey, Hsuan-Wei Fu

Automated market makers (AMMs) are pricing mechanisms utilized by decentralized exchanges (DEX). Traditional AMM approaches are constrained by pricing solely based on their own liquidity pool, without consideration of external markets or risk management for liquidity providers. In this paper, we propose a new approach known as UBET AMM (UAMM), which calculates prices by considering external market prices and the impermanent loss of the liquidity pool. Despite relying on external market prices, our method maintains the desired properties of a constant product curve when computing slippages. The key element of UAMM is determining the appropriate slippage amount based on the desired target balance, which encourages the liquidity pool to minimize impermanent loss. We demonstrate that our approach eliminates arbitrage opportunities when external market prices are efficient.

Read more

8/27/2024

Measuring Arbitrage Losses and Profitability of AMM Liquidity
Total Score

0

Measuring Arbitrage Losses and Profitability of AMM Liquidity

Robin Fritsch, Andrea Canidio

This paper presents the results of a comprehensive empirical study of losses to arbitrageurs (following the formalization of loss-versus-rebalancing by [Milionis et al., 2022]) incurred by liquidity providers on automated market makers (AMMs). We show that those losses exceed the fees earned by liquidity providers across many of the largest AMM liquidity pools (on Uniswap). Remarkably, we also find that the Uniswap v2 pools are more profitable for passive LPs than their Uniswap v3 counterparts. We also investigate how arbitrage losses change with block times. As expected, arbitrage losses decrease when block production is faster. However, the rate of the decline varies significantly across different trading pairs. For instance, when comparing 100ms block times to Ethereum's current 12-second block times, the decrease in losses to arbitrageurs ranges between 20% to 70%, depending on the specific trading pair.

Read more

4/23/2024

SAMM: Sharded Automated Market Makers
Total Score

0

SAMM: Sharded Automated Market Makers

Hongyin Chen, Amit Vaisman, Ittay Eyal

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) are a cornerstone of decentralized finance. They are smart contracts (stateful programs) running on blockchains. They enable virtual token exchange: Traders swap tokens with the AMM for a fee, while liquidity providers supply liquidity and earn these fees. Demand for AMMs is growing rapidly, but our experiment-based estimates show that current architectures cannot meet the projected demand by 2029. This is because the execution of existing AMMs is non-parallelizable. We present SAMM, an AMM comprising multiple shards. All shards are AMMs running on the same chain, but their independence enables parallel execution. Unlike classical sharding solutions, here security relies on incentive compatibility. Therefore, SAMM introduces a novel fee design. Through analysis of Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria (SPNE), we show that SAMM incentivizes the desired behavior: Liquidity providers balance liquidity among all shards, overcoming destabilization attacks, and trades are evenly distributed. We validate our game-theoretic analysis with a simulation using real-world data. We evaluate SAMM by implementing and deploying it on local testnets of the Sui and Solana blockchains. To our knowledge, this is the first quantification of ``hot-contract'' performance. SAMM improves throughput by 5x and 16x, respectively, potentially more with better parallelization of the underlying blockchains. It is directly deployable, mitigating the upcoming scaling bottleneck.

Read more

9/11/2024