Sample Amplification: Increasing Dataset Size even when Learning is Impossible

Read original: arXiv:1904.12053 - Published 8/27/2024 by Brian Axelrod, Shivam Garg, Vatsal Sharan, Gregory Valiant

🧠

Overview

The paper explores the extent to which a given dataset drawn from an unknown distribution can be "amplified" to produce a larger set of samples that appear to come from the same distribution.
The authors formalize this as an "(n, m) amplification procedure" that takes n independent draws from an unknown distribution D and outputs m > n "samples" that are indistinguishable from m independent draws from D.
The paper considers two fundamental settings: discrete distributions supported on ≤ k elements, and d-dimensional Gaussians with unknown mean and fixed covariance.

Plain English Explanation

In many situations, we may only have access to a small dataset drawn from an unknown distribution. The key question explored in this paper is: can we take this limited dataset and "amplify" it to produce a larger set of samples that appear to come from the same underlying distribution?

The researchers formalize this as an "amplification procedure" - an algorithm that takes n samples from an unknown distribution D, and outputs m > n new "samples" that are statistically indistinguishable from m independent draws from D.

The paper focuses on two important settings:

Discrete distributions: Where the unknown distribution D is supported on ≤ k elements. The researchers show that with just √k samples, you can output n+1 samples that are statistically very close to n+1 independent draws from D. This is striking, since you'd normally need Θ(k) samples to learn D well.
Gaussian distributions: Where D is a d-dimensional Gaussian with unknown mean and fixed covariance. Here too, the researchers demonstrate an amplification procedure that can generate n+Θ(n/√d) samples that are hard to distinguish from independent Gaussian draws, even though learning the full Gaussian requires Θ(d) samples.

These results suggest that in many cases, we may be able to "get more out of" a limited dataset than one might expect - a potentially valuable capability in data-scarce settings.

Technical Explanation

The core idea of the paper is to formalize the notion of an "(n, m) amplification procedure" - an algorithm that takes n independent draws from an unknown distribution D, and outputs a set of m > n "samples" that are indistinguishable from m independent draws from D.

Formally, an amplification procedure is considered "valid" if no algorithm can distinguish the m samples it outputs from m i.i.d. draws from D, with probability greater than 2/3.

The paper focuses on two key settings:

Discrete distributions: Here, the unknown distribution D is supported on ≤ k elements. The researchers show that an (n, n+Θ(n/√k)) amplifier exists - meaning that with just √k samples from D, you can output n+1 samples that are statistically very close to n+1 independent draws. This is significant, since learning D to small total variation distance normally requires Θ(k) samples.
Gaussian distributions: Here, D is a d-dimensional Gaussian with unknown mean and fixed covariance. The researchers demonstrate an (n, n+Θ(n/√d)) amplifier - you can generate n+Θ(n/√d) samples that are hard to distinguish from independent Gaussian draws, even though learning the full Gaussian requires Θ(d) samples.

Importantly, the researchers show that these amplification results are tight up to constant factors in both the discrete and Gaussian settings.

Critical Analysis

The key insight of this work is that in many cases, we may be able to "get more out of" a limited dataset than one might expect - a valuable capability in data-scarce settings. The researchers provide a rigorous theoretical framework for understanding this amplification phenomenon.

That said, there are some important caveats and limitations to consider:

The amplification procedures assume access to i.i.d. samples from the unknown distribution D. In practice, datasets may exhibit more complex statistical dependencies.
While the paper provides tight results for the specific discrete and Gaussian settings studied, the general amplification question remains open for other distribution families.
The practical feasibility and efficiency of implementing these amplification procedures is not addressed - an important consideration for real-world applications.

Additionally, one could question whether the goal of indistinguishable samples is the right target - there may be cases where slightly biased but more diverse synthetic samples could be more valuable than statistically perfect ones.

Overall, this work opens up intriguing new directions for research on getting the most out of limited data, but further investigation is needed to fully understand the implications and practical applicability of these techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel theoretical framework for understanding the extent to which a limited dataset can be "amplified" to produce a larger set of samples that appear to come from the same underlying distribution.

The key results demonstrate the existence of tight amplification procedures for discrete and Gaussian distributions, showing that in many cases, we can generate substantially more samples than the size of the original dataset, while preserving statistical indistinguishability.

These findings suggest exciting possibilities for data-scarce settings, where techniques like this could help maximize the value extracted from limited data. However, practical implementation, robustness to real-world data complexities, and alternative notions of sample quality remain important areas for future research.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Sample Amplification: Increasing Dataset Size even when Learning is Impossible

Brian Axelrod, Shivam Garg, Vatsal Sharan, Gregory Valiant

Given data drawn from an unknown distribution, $D$, to what extent is it possible to ``amplify'' this dataset and output an even larger set of samples that appear to have been drawn from $D$? We formalize this question as follows: an $(n,m)$ $text{amplification procedure}$ takes as input $n$ independent draws from an unknown distribution $D$, and outputs a set of $m > n$ ``samples''. An amplification procedure is valid if no algorithm can distinguish the set of $m$ samples produced by the amplifier from a set of $m$ independent draws from $D$, with probability greater than $2/3$. Perhaps surprisingly, in many settings, a valid amplification procedure exists, even when the size of the input dataset, $n$, is significantly less than what would be necessary to learn $D$ to non-trivial accuracy. Specifically we consider two fundamental settings: the case where $D$ is an arbitrary discrete distribution supported on $le k$ elements, and the case where $D$ is a $d$-dimensional Gaussian with unknown mean, and fixed covariance. In the first case, we show that an $left(n, n + Theta(frac{n}{sqrt{k}})right)$ amplifier exists. In particular, given $n=O(sqrt{k})$ samples from $D$, one can output a set of $m=n+1$ datapoints, whose total variation distance from the distribution of $m$ i.i.d. draws from $D$ is a small constant, despite the fact that one would need quadratically more data, $n=Theta(k)$, to learn $D$ up to small constant total variation distance. In the Gaussian case, we show that an $left(n,n+Theta(frac{n}{sqrt{d}} )right)$ amplifier exists, even though learning the distribution to small constant total variation distance requires $Theta(d)$ samples. In both the discrete and Gaussian settings, we show that these results are tight, to constant factors. Beyond these results, we formalize a number of curious directions for future research along this vein.

8/27/2024

↗️

On the Statistical Complexity of Sample Amplification

Brian Axelrod, Shivam Garg, Yanjun Han, Vatsal Sharan, Gregory Valiant

The ``sample amplification'' problem formalizes the following question: Given $n$ i.i.d. samples drawn from an unknown distribution $P$, when is it possible to produce a larger set of $n+m$ samples which cannot be distinguished from $n+m$ i.i.d. samples drawn from $P$? In this work, we provide a firm statistical foundation for this problem by deriving generally applicable amplification procedures, lower bound techniques and connections to existing statistical notions. Our techniques apply to a large class of distributions including the exponential family, and establish a rigorous connection between sample amplification and distribution learning.

9/19/2024

🤖

On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions

Nika Haghtalab, Michael I. Jordan, Eric Zhao

Social and real-world considerations such as robustness, fairness, social welfare and multi-agent tradeoffs have given rise to multi-distribution learning paradigms, such as collaborative learning, group distributionally robust optimization, and fair federated learning. In each of these settings, a learner seeks to uniformly minimize its expected loss over $n$ predefined data distributions, while using as few samples as possible. In this paper, we establish the optimal sample complexity of these learning paradigms and give algorithms that meet this sample complexity. Importantly, our sample complexity bounds for multi-distribution learning exceed that of learning a single distribution by only an additive factor of $n log(n) / epsilon^2$. This improves upon the best known sample complexity bounds for fair federated learning by Mohri et al. and collaborative learning by Nguyen and Zakynthinou by multiplicative factors of $n$ and $log(n)/epsilon^3$, respectively. We also provide the first sample complexity bounds for the group DRO objective of Sagawa et al. To guarantee these optimal sample complexity bounds, our algorithms learn to sample from data distributions on demand. Our algorithm design and analysis are enabled by our extensions of online learning techniques for solving stochastic zero-sum games. In particular, we contribute stochastic variants of no-regret dynamics that can trade off between players' differing sampling costs.

4/4/2024

📊

Data Complexity Estimates for Operator Learning

Nikola B. Kovachki, Samuel Lanthaler, Hrushikesh Mhaskar

Operator learning has emerged as a new paradigm for the data-driven approximation of nonlinear operators. Despite its empirical success, the theoretical underpinnings governing the conditions for efficient operator learning remain incomplete. The present work develops theory to study the data complexity of operator learning, complementing existing research on the parametric complexity. We investigate the fundamental question: How many input/output samples are needed in operator learning to achieve a desired accuracy $epsilon$? This question is addressed from the point of view of $n$-widths, and this work makes two key contributions. The first contribution is to derive lower bounds on $n$-widths for general classes of Lipschitz and Fr'echet differentiable operators. These bounds rigorously demonstrate a ``curse of data-complexity'', revealing that learning on such general classes requires a sample size exponential in the inverse of the desired accuracy $epsilon$. The second contribution of this work is to show that ``parametric efficiency'' implies ``data efficiency''; using the Fourier neural operator (FNO) as a case study, we show rigorously that on a narrower class of operators, efficiently approximated by FNO in terms of the number of tunable parameters, efficient operator learning is attainable in data complexity as well. Specifically, we show that if only an algebraically increasing number of tunable parameters is needed to reach a desired approximation accuracy, then an algebraically bounded number of data samples is also sufficient to achieve the same accuracy.

5/28/2024