Scaling Laws with Vocabulary: Larger Models Deserve Larger Vocabularies
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper examines the relationship between language model size and vocabulary size, finding that larger models perform better with larger vocabularies.
• The researchers conduct experiments on various language models, including those discussed in other papers, to understand how vocabulary size impacts model performance.
• The key insight is that as language models grow larger, they can effectively utilize larger vocabularies, which allows them to better capture the nuances and complexities of natural language.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how the size of a language model, which is a type of artificial intelligence that can understand and generate human-like text, affects the optimal size of its vocabulary. The researchers found that as language models become larger and more capable, they perform better when they have access to a larger vocabulary.
This is because larger models have the capacity to effectively learn and utilize a richer set of words and expressions. With a larger vocabulary, they can more accurately represent the subtleties and variations in natural language.
For example, a small language model may only know a few basic ways to express a concept, like "happy" or "joyful." But a larger model with a more extensive vocabulary could choose from a wider range of nuanced words like "elated," "ecstatic," "gleeful," and so on, allowing it to generate more natural and human-like text.
The researchers provide evidence for this relationship between model size and vocabulary size through a series of experiments. They show that as language models grow larger, the optimal vocabulary size also increases, allowing the models to achieve better performance on various language tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the relationship between the size of language models and the size of their vocabularies. The researchers conduct experiments using a variety of large language models, including those discussed in related papers like Language Models Scale Reliably with Training Data Size, to understand how vocabulary size impacts model performance.
The key finding is that as language models become larger, they are able to effectively utilize larger vocabularies, which allows them to better capture the nuances and complexities of natural language. This is because larger models have the capacity to learn and leverage a richer set of words and expressions, enabling them to more accurately represent the subtle variations in human language.
The researchers systematically explore this relationship by training language models of different sizes and measuring their performance on various tasks as a function of vocabulary size. They find that the optimal vocabulary size increases as the model size grows, and that larger models consistently outperform smaller models when given access to a vocabulary that is appropriately scaled to their size.
These results have important implications for the design and development of large language models. They suggest that as these models continue to grow in size and capability, it will be necessary to also scale up their vocabularies to unlock their full potential and achieve the best possible performance on natural language tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling and well-designed study on the relationship between language model size and vocabulary size. The researchers' approach of systematically exploring this relationship across multiple model architectures and tasks is a strength, as it strengthens the generalizability of their findings.
However, one potential limitation is that the experiments were conducted on a relatively narrow set of language tasks, such as language modeling and machine translation. It would be interesting to see how the insights from this paper translate to other areas of natural language processing, such as question answering, dialogue systems, or text generation for creative applications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms that drive the observed relationship between model size and vocabulary size. Further research could investigate the cognitive and computational processes that enable larger models to effectively leverage larger vocabularies, which could lead to a more fundamental understanding of language model scaling.
Another area for potential exploration is the interplay between vocabulary size and other model hyperparameters, such as the number of model parameters or the training dataset size. It's possible that there are complex interactions between these factors that could provide additional insights into the design of large language models.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the growing body of research on scaling laws in language models. By highlighting the significance of vocabulary size as a key factor in model performance, it encourages the AI research community to consider vocabulary as a critical component in the development of ever-larger and more capable language models.
Conclusion
This paper presents compelling evidence that as language models become larger and more sophisticated, they are able to effectively utilize larger vocabularies, which in turn allows them to better capture the nuances and complexities of natural language.
The researchers' systematic exploration of this relationship across multiple model architectures and tasks provides a strong foundation for understanding the importance of vocabulary size in the development of large language models. Their findings suggest that as these models continue to grow in size and capability, it will be necessary to also scale up their vocabularies to unlock their full potential and achieve the best possible performance on a wide range of natural language tasks.
While the paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of language tasks, the insights it provides have broader implications for the field of natural language processing. By highlighting the significance of vocabulary size as a key factor in model performance, it encourages the AI research community to consider vocabulary as a critical component in the design and development of ever-larger and more capable language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Scaling Laws with Vocabulary: Larger Models Deserve Larger Vocabularies
Chaofan Tao, Qian Liu, Longxu Dou, Niklas Muennighoff, Zhongwei Wan, Ping Luo, Min Lin, Ngai Wong
Research on scaling large language models (LLMs) has primarily focused on model parameters and training data size, overlooking the role of vocabulary size. We investigate how vocabulary size impacts LLM scaling laws by training models ranging from 33M to 3B parameters on up to 500B characters with various vocabulary configurations. We propose three complementary approaches for predicting the compute-optimal vocabulary size: IsoFLOPs analysis, derivative estimation, and parametric fit of the loss function. Our approaches converge on the same result that the optimal vocabulary size depends on the available compute budget and that larger models deserve larger vocabularies. However, most LLMs use too small vocabulary sizes. For example, we predict that the optimal vocabulary size of Llama2-70B should have been at least 216K, 7 times larger than its vocabulary of 32K. We validate our predictions empirically by training models with 3B parameters across different FLOPs budgets. Adopting our predicted optimal vocabulary size consistently improves downstream performance over commonly used vocabulary sizes. By increasing the vocabulary size from the conventional 32K to 43K, we improve performance on ARC-Challenge from 29.1 to 32.0 with the same 2.3e21 FLOPs. Our work emphasizes the necessity of jointly considering model parameters and vocabulary size for efficient scaling.
Read more7/29/2024
💬
0
Large Vocabulary Size Improves Large Language Models
Sho Takase, Ryokan Ri, Shun Kiyono, Takuya Kato
This paper empirically investigates the relationship between subword vocabulary size and the performance of large language models (LLMs) to provide insights on how to define the vocabulary size. Experimental results show that larger vocabulary sizes lead to better performance in LLMs. Moreover, we consider a continual training scenario where a pre-trained language model is trained on a different target language. We introduce a simple method to use a new vocabulary instead of the pre-defined one. We show that using the new vocabulary outperforms the model with the vocabulary used in pre-training.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks
Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Rulin Shao, Jean Mercat, Alex Fang, Jeffrey Li, Sedrick Keh, Rui Xin, Marianna Nezhurina, Igor Vasiljevic, Jenia Jitsev, Luca Soldaini, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Gabriel Ilharco, Pang Wei Koh, Shuran Song, Thomas Kollar, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Reinhard Heckel, Niklas Muennighoff, Ludwig Schmidt
Scaling laws are useful guides for derisking expensive training runs, as they predict performance of large models using cheaper, small-scale experiments. However, there remain gaps between current scaling studies and how language models are ultimately trained and evaluated. For instance, scaling is usually studied in the compute-optimal training regime (i.e., Chinchilla optimal regime). In contrast, models are often over-trained to reduce inference costs. Moreover, scaling laws mostly predict loss on next-token prediction, but models are usually compared on downstream task performance. To address both shortcomings, we create a testbed of 104 models with 0.011B to 6.9B parameters trained with various numbers of tokens on three data distributions. First, we fit scaling laws that extrapolate in both the amount of over-training and the number of model parameters. This enables us to predict the validation loss of a 1.4B parameter, 900B token run (i.e., 32$times$ over-trained) and a 6.9B parameter, 138B token run (i.e., a compute-optimal run)$unicode{x2014}$each from experiments that take 300$times$ less compute. Second, we relate the perplexity of a language model to its downstream task performance by proposing a power law. We use this law to predict top-1 error averaged over downstream tasks for the two aforementioned models, using experiments that take 20$times$ less compute. Our experiments are available at https://github.com/mlfoundations/scaling.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Scaling Retrieval-Based Language Models with a Trillion-Token Datastore
Rulin Shao, Jacqueline He, Akari Asai, Weijia Shi, Tim Dettmers, Sewon Min, Luke Zettlemoyer, Pang Wei Koh
Scaling laws with respect to the amount of training data and the number of parameters allow us to predict the cost-benefit trade-offs of pretraining language models (LMs) in different configurations. In this paper, we consider another dimension of scaling: the amount of data available at inference time. Specifically, we find that increasing the size of the datastore used by a retrieval-based LM monotonically improves language modeling and several downstream tasks without obvious saturation, such that a smaller model augmented with a large datastore outperforms a larger LM-only model on knowledge-intensive tasks. By plotting compute-optimal scaling curves with varied datastore, model, and pretraining data sizes, we show that using larger datastores can significantly improve model performance for the same training compute budget. We carry out our study by constructing a 1.4 trillion-token datastore named MassiveDS, which is the largest and the most diverse open-sourced datastore for retrieval-based LMs to date, and designing an efficient pipeline for studying datastore scaling in a computationally accessible manner. Finally, we analyze the effect of improving the retriever, datastore quality filtering, and other design choices on our observed scaling trends. Overall, our results show that datastore size should be considered as an integral part of LM efficiency and performance trade-offs. To facilitate future research, we open-source our datastore and code at https://github.com/RulinShao/retrieval-scaling.
Read more7/19/2024