Schema Matching with Large Language Models: an Experimental Study

Read original: arXiv:2407.11852 - Published 7/17/2024 by Marcel Parciak, Brecht Vandevoort, Frank Neven, Liesbet M. Peeters, Stijn Vansummeren
Total Score

0

Schema Matching with Large Language Models: an Experimental Study

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an experimental study on using large language models (LLMs) for schema matching, which is the task of identifying correspondences between attributes in different data schemas.
  • The researchers explore how LLMs like BERT and GPT-3 can be leveraged for schema matching, and compare their performance to traditional schema matching approaches.
  • The study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of LLM-based schema matching, as well as directions for future research in this area.

Plain English Explanation

Schema matching is an important task in data integration and database management, where you need to find connections between the attributes (fields) in different data sources. This can be a challenging problem, especially when dealing with complex or ambiguous data schemas.

This research investigates whether powerful language models like BERT and GPT-3 can be effectively used for schema matching. The key idea is that these large language models, trained on massive amounts of text data, may be able to understand the semantic relationships between attributes better than traditional rule-based or machine learning approaches.

The researchers designed experiments to test the performance of LLM-based schema matching on various real-world datasets. They compared the LLM-based methods to other state-of-the-art schema matching techniques, looking at factors like matching accuracy, efficiency, and robustness to noise.

The results suggest that LLMs can indeed be a powerful tool for schema matching, often outperforming traditional methods. However, the researchers also identified some limitations and areas for improvement, such as the need for better integration of domain-specific knowledge and the challenges of scaling LLM-based approaches to very large schemas.

Overall, this study provides an important exploration of the potential of large language models for schema matching, and lays the groundwork for further research and development in this area. As data integration and management becomes increasingly complex, techniques like this could have significant implications for a wide range of industries and applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by reviewing the traditional approaches to schema matching, which often rely on rule-based techniques or supervised machine learning models trained on labeled data. The authors argue that while these methods can be effective, they have limitations in terms of scalability, flexibility, and the ability to capture more nuanced semantic relationships.

To address these limitations, the researchers investigate the use of large language models (LLMs) for schema matching. The key idea is that these pre-trained models, such as BERT and GPT-3, can leverage their deep understanding of language and semantics to identify meaningful correspondences between schema attributes.

The experimental design involves several steps:

  1. Data Preparation: The researchers curate several real-world datasets with diverse data schemas, covering domains like e-commerce, finance, and healthcare.
  2. Baseline Comparisons: They compare the performance of LLM-based schema matching to traditional approaches, including rule-based methods and supervised machine learning models.
  3. LLM Architectures: The study explores different ways of integrating LLMs into the schema matching pipeline, such as using them for attribute embedding, similarity scoring, and end-to-end matching.
  4. Robustness Evaluation: The researchers assess the LLM-based methods' resilience to challenges like schema noise, missing data, and attribute renaming.

The results show that the LLM-based schema matching approaches generally outperform the baselines, with significant improvements in matching accuracy and robustness. The authors attribute these benefits to the LLMs' ability to capture semantic relationships and contextual information that traditional methods often struggle with.

However, the paper also highlights some limitations of the LLM-based approach. For example, the researchers note that the performance can be sensitive to the choice of LLM and fine-tuning strategy, and that scaling these methods to very large schemas remains a challenge. Additionally, they suggest that further integration of domain-specific knowledge could further improve the LLM-based schema matching capabilities.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed experimental study on the use of large language models for schema matching. The researchers have carefully considered the limitations of existing approaches and have made a strong case for the potential of LLMs in this domain.

One of the key strengths of the study is the diversity of the datasets used, which helps to ensure the generalizability of the findings. The researchers have also done a commendable job of comparing the LLM-based methods to a range of traditional schema matching techniques, providing a robust baseline for evaluating the performance.

That said, the paper could have delved deeper into some of the limitations and potential pitfalls of the LLM-based approach. For instance, the authors mention the sensitivity to the choice of LLM and fine-tuning strategy, but do not provide much detail on how to navigate these choices effectively. Additionally, while the scalability challenges are acknowledged, the paper could have explored potential solutions or workarounds in more depth.

Furthermore, the paper does not address the computational and resource requirements of the LLM-based methods, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployments, especially in resource-constrained environments. A more thorough discussion of these practical implications would have strengthened the overall analysis.

Nevertheless, the paper remains a valuable contribution to the field of schema matching, and the insights it provides on the potential of large language models are likely to inspire further research and development in this area. As data integration challenges continue to grow in complexity, techniques like those explored in this study could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of industries and applications.

Conclusion

This experimental study has demonstrated the promising potential of using large language models for schema matching, a critical task in data integration and database management. The results suggest that LLMs can outperform traditional schema matching approaches in terms of accuracy, robustness, and the ability to capture semantic relationships between schema attributes.

While the paper identifies some limitations and areas for further research, such as the need for better integration of domain-specific knowledge and the challenges of scaling LLM-based methods, the overall findings are highly encouraging. As data ecosystems become increasingly complex, the ability to leverage powerful language models like BERT and GPT-3 for schema matching could have significant implications across a wide range of industries and applications.

The researchers have laid an important foundation for future work in this area, and the insights provided in this study are likely to inspire further advancements in the field of data integration and management. As the capabilities of large language models continue to evolve, the potential for innovative solutions to complex data challenges, such as those explored in this paper, is likely to only grow.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Schema Matching with Large Language Models: an Experimental Study
Total Score

0

Schema Matching with Large Language Models: an Experimental Study

Marcel Parciak, Brecht Vandevoort, Frank Neven, Liesbet M. Peeters, Stijn Vansummeren

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown useful applications in a variety of tasks, including data wrangling. In this paper, we investigate the use of an off-the-shelf LLM for schema matching. Our objective is to identify semantic correspondences between elements of two relational schemas using only names and descriptions. Using a newly created benchmark from the health domain, we propose different so-called task scopes. These are methods for prompting the LLM to do schema matching, which vary in the amount of context information contained in the prompt. Using these task scopes we compare LLM-based schema matching against a string similarity baseline, investigating matching quality, verification effort, decisiveness, and complementarity of the approaches. We find that matching quality suffers from a lack of context information, but also from providing too much context information. In general, using newer LLM versions increases decisiveness. We identify task scopes that have acceptable verification effort and succeed in identifying a significant number of true semantic matches. Our study shows that LLMs have potential in bootstrapping the schema matching process and are able to assist data engineers in speeding up this task solely based on schema element names and descriptions without the need for data instances.

Read more

7/17/2024

ReMatch: Retrieval Enhanced Schema Matching with LLMs
Total Score

0

ReMatch: Retrieval Enhanced Schema Matching with LLMs

Eitam Sheetrit, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren Elisha

Schema matching is a crucial task in data integration, involving the alignment of a source schema with a target schema to establish correspondence between their elements. This task is challenging due to textual and semantic heterogeneity, as well as differences in schema sizes. Although machine-learning-based solutions have been explored in numerous studies, they often suffer from low accuracy, require manual mapping of the schemas for model training, or need access to source schema data which might be unavailable due to privacy concerns. In this paper we present a novel method, named ReMatch, for matching schemas using retrieval-enhanced Large Language Models (LLMs). Our method avoids the need for predefined mapping, any model training, or access to data in the source database. Our experimental results on large real-world schemas demonstrate that ReMatch is an effective matcher. By eliminating the requirement for training data, ReMatch becomes a viable solution for real-world scenarios.

Read more

5/31/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Entity Matching using Large Language Models

Ralph Peeters, Christian Bizer

Entity Matching is the task of deciding whether two entity descriptions refer to the same real-world entity and is a central step in most data integration pipelines. Many state-of-the-art entity matching methods rely on pre-trained language models (PLMs) such as BERT or RoBERTa. Two major drawbacks of these models for entity matching are that (i) the models require significant amounts of task-specific training data and (ii) the fine-tuned models are not robust concerning out-of-distribution entities. This paper investigates using generative large language models (LLMs) as a less task-specific training data-dependent and more robust alternative to PLM-based matchers. Our study covers hosted and open-source LLMs, which can be run locally. We evaluate these models in a zero-shot scenario and a scenario where task-specific training data is available. We compare different prompt designs and the prompt sensitivity of the models and show that there is no single best prompt but needs to be tuned for each model/dataset combination. We further investigate (i) the selection of in-context demonstrations, (ii) the generation of matching rules, as well as (iii) fine-tuning a hosted LLM using the same pool of training data. Our experiments show that the best LLMs require no or only a few training examples to perform similarly to PLMs that were fine-tuned using thousands of examples. LLM-based matchers further exhibit higher robustness to unseen entities. We show that GPT4 can generate structured explanations for matching decisions. The model can automatically identify potential causes of matching errors by analyzing explanations of wrong decisions. We demonstrate that the model can generate meaningful textual descriptions of the identified error classes, which can help data engineers improve entity matching pipelines.

Read more

6/6/2024

LLMs4OM: Matching Ontologies with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

LLMs4OM: Matching Ontologies with Large Language Models

Hamed Babaei Giglou, Jennifer D'Souza, Felix Engel, Soren Auer

Ontology Matching (OM), is a critical task in knowledge integration, where aligning heterogeneous ontologies facilitates data interoperability and knowledge sharing. Traditional OM systems often rely on expert knowledge or predictive models, with limited exploration of the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs). We present the LLMs4OM framework, a novel approach to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in OM tasks. This framework utilizes two modules for retrieval and matching, respectively, enhanced by zero-shot prompting across three ontology representations: concept, concept-parent, and concept-children. Through comprehensive evaluations using 20 OM datasets from various domains, we demonstrate that LLMs, under the LLMs4OM framework, can match and even surpass the performance of traditional OM systems, particularly in complex matching scenarios. Our results highlight the potential of LLMs to significantly contribute to the field of OM.

Read more

4/24/2024