Score Normalization for Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines how to address demographic biases in face recognition systems
- Proposes a score normalization technique to improve fairness across different demographic groups
- Evaluates the method on multiple face recognition datasets
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the issue of demographic biases in face recognition systems. These systems can often perform better for certain demographic groups, like white males, while struggling with other groups like women or people of color. The researchers propose a technique called "score normalization" to help address this problem.
The basic idea is to adjust the output scores of the face recognition model so that the performance is more equalized across different demographic groups. This involves analyzing the distribution of scores for each group and then applying a normalization process to make the scores more comparable.
By doing this, the researchers aim to improve the overall fairness of the face recognition system, so that it performs well regardless of the user's demographic background. This could help make these technologies more inclusive and reliable for a wider range of people.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a score normalization technique to address demographic biases in face recognition systems. The core approach involves:
- Estimating the score distributions for different demographic groups based on ground truth labels.
- Applying a normalization function to transform the scores so the distributions are more aligned across groups.
- Using the normalized scores for improved fairness in face recognition tasks.
The authors evaluate this method on multiple face recognition datasets and show it can reduce demographic disparities in performance metrics like true acceptance rate and differential fairness.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a practical approach to improving demographic fairness in face recognition, but there are some potential limitations. The normalization function relies on estimating score distributions, which may be challenging with small or imbalanced datasets. Additionally, the method focuses on fairness at the system level, but does not address potential biases in the underlying training data or model architecture.
Further research could explore ways to make the normalization more robust, or to combine it with other fairness-enhancing techniques like adversarial debiasing or causal modeling. Broader considerations around the societal impacts of face recognition systems should also be investigated.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising score normalization technique to improve demographic fairness in face recognition. By adjusting model outputs to align performance across different groups, the method aims to make these systems more inclusive and reliable. While there are some limitations, the work demonstrates the importance of addressing biases in AI technologies and provides a practical approach for doing so.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Score Normalization for Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition
Yu Linghu, Tiago de Freitas Pereira, Christophe Ecabert, S'ebastien Marcel, Manuel Gunther
Fair biometric algorithms have similar verification performance across different demographic groups given a single decision threshold. Unfortunately, for state-of-the-art face recognition networks, score distributions differ between demographics. Contrary to work that tries to align those distributions by extra training or fine-tuning, we solely focus on score post-processing methods. As proved, well-known sample-centered score normalization techniques, Z-norm and T-norm, do not improve fairness for high-security operating points. Thus, we extend the standard Z/T-norm to integrate demographic information in normalization. Additionally, we investigate several possibilities to incorporate cohort similarities for both genuine and impostor pairs per demographic to improve fairness across different operating points. We run experiments on two datasets with different demographics (gender and ethnicity) and show that our techniques generally improve the overall fairness of five state-of-the-art pre-trained face recognition networks, without downgrading verification performance. We also indicate that an equal contribution of False Match Rate (FMR) and False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) in fairness evaluation is required for the highest gains. Code and protocols are available.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Fairness measures for biometric quality assessment
Andr'e Dorsch, Torsten Schlett, Peter Munch, Christian Rathgeb, Christoph Busch
Quality assessment algorithms measure the quality of a captured biometric sample. Since the sample quality strongly affects the recognition performance of a biometric system, it is essential to only process samples of sufficient quality and discard samples of low-quality. Even though quality assessment algorithms are not intended to yield very different quality scores across demographic groups, quality score discrepancies are possible, resulting in different discard ratios. To ensure that quality assessment algorithms do not take demographic characteristics into account when assessing sample quality and consequently to ensure that the quality algorithms perform equally for all individuals, it is crucial to develop a fairness measure. In this work we propose and compare multiple fairness measures for evaluating quality components across demographic groups. Proposed measures, could be used as potential candidates for an upcoming standard in this important field.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Toward Fairer Face Recognition Datasets
Alexandre Fournier-Mongieux, Michael Soumm, Adrian Popescu, Bertrand Luvison, Herv'e Le Borgne
Face recognition and verification are two computer vision tasks whose performance has progressed with the introduction of deep representations. However, ethical, legal, and technical challenges due to the sensitive character of face data and biases in real training datasets hinder their development. Generative AI addresses privacy by creating fictitious identities, but fairness problems persist. We promote fairness by introducing a demographic attributes balancing mechanism in generated training datasets. We experiment with an existing real dataset, three generated training datasets, and the balanced versions of a diffusion-based dataset. We propose a comprehensive evaluation that considers accuracy and fairness equally and includes a rigorous regression-based statistical analysis of attributes. The analysis shows that balancing reduces demographic unfairness. Also, a performance gap persists despite generation becoming more accurate with time. The proposed balancing method and comprehensive verification evaluation promote fairer and transparent face recognition and verification.
Read more6/26/2024
0
FineFACE: Fair Facial Attribute Classification Leveraging Fine-grained Features
Ayesha Manzoor, Ajita Rattani
Published research highlights the presence of demographic bias in automated facial attribute classification algorithms, particularly impacting women and individuals with darker skin tones. Existing bias mitigation techniques typically require demographic annotations and often obtain a trade-off between fairness and accuracy, i.e., Pareto inefficiency. Facial attributes, whether common ones like gender or others such as chubby or high cheekbones, exhibit high interclass similarity and intraclass variation across demographics leading to unequal accuracy. This requires the use of local and subtle cues using fine-grained analysis for differentiation. This paper proposes a novel approach to fair facial attribute classification by framing it as a fine-grained classification problem. Our approach effectively integrates both low-level local features (like edges and color) and high-level semantic features (like shapes and structures) through cross-layer mutual attention learning. Here, shallow to deep CNN layers function as experts, offering category predictions and attention regions. An exhaustive evaluation on facial attribute annotated datasets demonstrates that our FineFACE model improves accuracy by 1.32% to 1.74% and fairness by 67% to 83.6%, over the SOTA bias mitigation techniques. Importantly, our approach obtains a Pareto-efficient balance between accuracy and fairness between demographic groups. In addition, our approach does not require demographic annotations and is applicable to diverse downstream classification tasks. To facilitate reproducibility, the code and dataset information is available at https://github.com/VCBSL-Fairness/FineFACE.
Read more9/2/2024