Searching for Programmatic Policies in Semantic Spaces
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the idea of "programmatic policies" - policies that can be represented as programs or code rather than traditional natural language descriptions.
- The researchers propose a method for searching for these programmatic policies within "semantic spaces" - high-dimensional representations of language that capture meaning and semantics.
- The goal is to enable policy authors to more easily find and reuse existing policies, potentially leading to more effective and consistent policymaking.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a new way to search for and work with policies, the rules and guidelines that governments and organizations use to make decisions. Traditionally, policies have been written out in natural language, like regular sentences and paragraphs. But the researchers think it could be better to express policies as programs or code instead.
Just like how software programs can be searched, modified, and combined, the researchers want to be able to do the same thing with policies. They call these "programmatic policies." To make this possible, they represent the policies in a "semantic space" - a high-dimensional mathematical space where words and concepts are mapped based on their meaning and relationships.
By searching within this semantic space, the researchers hope policy authors will be able to more easily find existing policies that are relevant to their needs. This could lead to policies that are more consistent and effective, as policy creators can build on and reuse good work that already exists, rather than starting from scratch every time.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of the paper is to represent policies as computable programs or algorithms, rather than just as natural language text. The researchers call these "programmatic policies." To enable searching and reuse of these programmatic policies, they propose embedding them in a high-dimensional "semantic space" - a mathematical representation of language that captures the meaning and relationships between concepts.
The key technical components are:
- A method for converting natural language policies into equivalent programmatic representations.
- Techniques for embedding these programmatic policies into a semantic space, based on the meaning and functionality of the policies.
- Algorithms for searching the semantic space to find relevant programmatic policies, given a new policy objective.
The paper demonstrates the feasibility of this approach through experiments, showing that relevant programmatic policies can be retrieved from the semantic space to solve new policy challenges. The researchers also discuss the potential benefits, such as increased policy reuse and consistency, as well as the technical challenges that remain, such as fully automating the conversion from natural language to programmatic form.
Critical Analysis
The core idea of "programmatic policies" is an interesting and potentially valuable one, as it could lead to more systematic and consistent policymaking. By representing policies as computable programs, they become more amenable to search, composition, and modification - much like how software engineering has progressed beyond static written specifications.
However, the paper does not fully address the significant technical challenges involved in accurately translating natural language policies into programmatic form. The proposed methods are still quite limited, and a lot of manual effort may be required to make this approach practical. There are also open questions about how to ensure the programmatic policies faithfully capture the intended meaning and nuance of the original natural language versions.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential societal implications and risks of this technology. Policymaking often involves delicate balances between competing interests and values. Automating or codifying this process too heavily could lead to unintended consequences if not done with great care and oversight.
Overall, the research represents an intriguing step forward, but significant further work is needed to make "programmatic policies" a reliable and trustworthy reality. Careful consideration of the ethical and practical challenges will be essential as this technology continues to develop.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to representing and searching for policies, by converting them into programmatic forms and embedding them in a semantic space. The core idea is that this could enable more systematic policy reuse and consistency, as policy authors can build upon and combine existing programmatic policies.
While the technical feasibility of this approach is demonstrated, significant challenges remain in fully automating the translation from natural language to programmatic policies, and in ensuring the fidelity of the resulting representations. Additionally, the societal implications of codifying policymaking in this way will require careful consideration.
Nevertheless, the research represents an interesting step forward in the broader goal of making policymaking more rigorous, efficient, and evidence-based. As language models and other AI technologies continue to advance, exploring ways to better leverage computational representations of policies could be a fruitful avenue for future work in this direction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Searching for Programmatic Policies in Semantic Spaces
Rubens O. Moraes, Levi H. S. Lelis
Syntax-guided synthesis is commonly used to generate programs encoding policies. In this approach, the set of programs, that can be written in a domain-specific language defines the search space, and an algorithm searches within this space for programs that encode strong policies. In this paper, we propose an alternative method for synthesizing programmatic policies, where we search within an approximation of the language's semantic space. We hypothesized that searching in semantic spaces is more sample-efficient compared to syntax-based spaces. Our rationale is that the search is more efficient if the algorithm evaluates different agent behaviors as it searches through the space, a feature often missing in syntax-based spaces. This is because small changes in the syntax of a program often do not result in different agent behaviors. We define semantic spaces by learning a library of programs that present different agent behaviors. Then, we approximate the semantic space by defining a neighborhood function for local search algorithms, where we replace parts of the current candidate program with programs from the library. We evaluated our hypothesis in a real-time strategy game called MicroRTS. Empirical results support our hypothesis that searching in semantic spaces can be more sample-efficient than searching in syntax-based spaces.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Synthesizing Programmatic Reinforcement Learning Policies with Large Language Model Guided Search
Max Liu, Chan-Hung Yu, Wei-Hsu Lee, Cheng-Wei Hung, Yen-Chun Chen, Shao-Hua Sun
Programmatic reinforcement learning (PRL) has been explored for representing policies through programs as a means to achieve interpretability and generalization. Despite promising outcomes, current state-of-the-art PRL methods are hindered by sample inefficiency, necessitating tens of millions of program-environment interactions. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a novel LLM-guided search framework (LLM-GS). Our key insight is to leverage the programming expertise and common sense reasoning of LLMs to enhance the efficiency of assumption-free, random-guessing search methods. We address the challenge of LLMs' inability to generate precise and grammatically correct programs in domain-specific languages (DSLs) by proposing a Pythonic-DSL strategy - an LLM is instructed to initially generate Python codes and then convert them into DSL programs. To further optimize the LLM-generated programs, we develop a search algorithm named Scheduled Hill Climbing, designed to efficiently explore the programmatic search space to consistently improve the programs. Experimental results in the Karel domain demonstrate the superior effectiveness and efficiency of our LLM-GS framework. Extensive ablation studies further verify the critical role of our Pythonic-DSL strategy and Scheduled Hill Climbing algorithm.
Read more5/28/2024
🛠️
0
Combinatorial Optimization with Policy Adaptation using Latent Space Search
Felix Chalumeau, Shikha Surana, Clement Bonnet, Nathan Grinsztajn, Arnu Pretorius, Alexandre Laterre, Thomas D. Barrett
Combinatorial Optimization underpins many real-world applications and yet, designing performant algorithms to solve these complex, typically NP-hard, problems remains a significant research challenge. Reinforcement Learning (RL) provides a versatile framework for designing heuristics across a broad spectrum of problem domains. However, despite notable progress, RL has not yet supplanted industrial solvers as the go-to solution. Current approaches emphasize pre-training heuristics that construct solutions but often rely on search procedures with limited variance, such as stochastically sampling numerous solutions from a single policy or employing computationally expensive fine-tuning of the policy on individual problem instances. Building on the intuition that performant search at inference time should be anticipated during pre-training, we propose COMPASS, a novel RL approach that parameterizes a distribution of diverse and specialized policies conditioned on a continuous latent space. We evaluate COMPASS across three canonical problems - Travelling Salesman, Capacitated Vehicle Routing, and Job-Shop Scheduling - and demonstrate that our search strategy (i) outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on 11 standard benchmarking tasks and (ii) generalizes better, surpassing all other approaches on a set of 18 procedurally transformed instance distributions.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Syntax-Guided Procedural Synthesis of Molecules
Michael Sun, Alston Lo, Wenhao Gao, Minghao Guo, Veronika Thost, Jie Chen, Connor Coley, Wojciech Matusik
Designing synthetically accessible molecules and recommending analogs to unsynthesizable molecules are important problems for accelerating molecular discovery. We reconceptualize both problems using ideas from program synthesis. Drawing inspiration from syntax-guided synthesis approaches, we decouple the syntactic skeleton from the semantics of a synthetic tree to create a bilevel framework for reasoning about the combinatorial space of synthesis pathways. Given a molecule we aim to generate analogs for, we iteratively refine its skeletal characteristics via Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations over the space of syntactic skeletons. Given a black-box oracle to optimize, we formulate a joint design space over syntactic templates and molecular descriptors and introduce evolutionary algorithms that optimize both syntactic and semantic dimensions synergistically. Our key insight is that once the syntactic skeleton is set, we can amortize over the search complexity of deriving the program's semantics by training policies to fully utilize the fixed horizon Markov Decision Process imposed by the syntactic template. We demonstrate performance advantages of our bilevel framework for synthesizable analog generation and synthesizable molecule design. Notably, our approach offers the user explicit control over the resources required to perform synthesis and biases the design space towards simpler solutions, making it particularly promising for autonomous synthesis platforms.
Read more9/11/2024