Combinatorial Optimization with Policy Adaptation using Latent Space Search
2311.13569
0
0
🛠️
Abstract
Combinatorial Optimization underpins many real-world applications and yet, designing performant algorithms to solve these complex, typically NP-hard, problems remains a significant research challenge. Reinforcement Learning (RL) provides a versatile framework for designing heuristics across a broad spectrum of problem domains. However, despite notable progress, RL has not yet supplanted industrial solvers as the go-to solution. Current approaches emphasize pre-training heuristics that construct solutions but often rely on search procedures with limited variance, such as stochastically sampling numerous solutions from a single policy or employing computationally expensive fine-tuning of the policy on individual problem instances. Building on the intuition that performant search at inference time should be anticipated during pre-training, we propose COMPASS, a novel RL approach that parameterizes a distribution of diverse and specialized policies conditioned on a continuous latent space. We evaluate COMPASS across three canonical problems - Travelling Salesman, Capacitated Vehicle Routing, and Job-Shop Scheduling - and demonstrate that our search strategy (i) outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on 11 standard benchmarking tasks and (ii) generalizes better, surpassing all other approaches on a set of 18 procedurally transformed instance distributions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to solve complex, real-world Combinatorial Optimization problems.
- Despite the versatility of RL, industrial solvers remain the go-to solution for these NP-hard problems.
- The authors propose a novel RL approach called COMPASS that parameterizes a distribution of diverse and specialized policies conditioned on a continuous latent space.
- COMPASS is evaluated on three canonical problems: Travelling Salesman, Capacitated Vehicle Routing, and Job-Shop Scheduling.
Plain English Explanation
Combinatorial Optimization problems are complex, real-world challenges that involve finding the best solution from a large number of possible options. These problems are often very difficult to solve, and are classified as NP-hard, meaning they are computationally expensive to solve exactly.
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a versatile approach that can be used to design heuristics, or rules of thumb, to solve these types of problems. RL allows an agent to learn how to make good decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties for its actions. However, despite the progress in RL, traditional industrial solvers are still the go-to solution for many Combinatorial Optimization problems.
The authors of this paper propose a new RL approach called COMPASS that aims to improve upon existing methods. The key idea behind COMPASS is to parameterize a distribution of diverse and specialized policies, rather than relying on a single policy. This allows the system to explore a wider range of possible solutions during the search process, which can lead to better overall performance.
The authors evaluate COMPASS on three well-known Combinatorial Optimization problems: the Travelling Salesman Problem, the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem, and the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem. They show that COMPASS outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on a range of standard benchmark tasks and also generalizes better to new problem instances.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel Reinforcement Learning approach called COMPASS (Combinatorial Optimization via Parameterized Adaptive Search Strategy) that aims to improve upon existing methods for solving complex Combinatorial Optimization problems.
The key innovation of COMPASS is the parameterization of a distribution of diverse and specialized policies conditioned on a continuous latent space. This is in contrast to many existing RL approaches that rely on a single policy or stochastically sample numerous solutions from a single policy.
The authors hypothesize that by anticipating the need for performant search at inference time during the pre-training phase, COMPASS can learn more effective heuristics for solving these NP-hard problems. The COMPASS architecture consists of an encoder that maps problem instances to a latent representation, a policy network that conditions on this latent space to output a distribution of specialized policies, and a rollout strategy that samples from this distribution to generate solutions.
The authors evaluate COMPASS on three canonical Combinatorial Optimization problems: the Travelling Salesman Problem, the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem, and the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem. They demonstrate that COMPASS outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on 11 standard benchmark tasks and also generalizes better, surpassing all other methods on a set of 18 procedurally transformed instance distributions.
The authors attribute the strong performance of COMPASS to its ability to learn a diverse set of specialized policies that can adaptively explore the search space, rather than relying on a single policy or limited search procedures. This latent space planning approach allows COMPASS to grow and improve the quality of the solutions generated during the search process.
Critical Analysis
The authors present a compelling approach to solving Combinatorial Optimization problems using Reinforcement Learning. By parameterizing a distribution of diverse policies, COMPASS addresses a key limitation of many existing RL methods that rely on a single policy or limited search procedures.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity or runtime performance of COMPASS compared to traditional industrial solvers. While COMPASS outperforms state-of-the-art RL approaches, it is unclear how it scales to larger problem instances or whether it can match the efficiency of specialized solvers in practical settings.
Additionally, the paper focuses on three canonical Combinatorial Optimization problems, but does not explore the broader applicability of COMPASS to other problem domains. It would be interesting to see how the approach generalizes to a wider range of Combinatorial Optimization challenges, especially those with unique constraints or objectives.
Finally, the authors mention the potential for multitask learning to further improve the generalization capabilities of COMPASS, but do not provide details on how this could be implemented or evaluated. Exploring this direction could lead to even more robust and versatile RL-based solvers for Combinatorial Optimization problems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel Reinforcement Learning approach called COMPASS that aims to improve upon existing methods for solving complex Combinatorial Optimization problems. By parameterizing a distribution of diverse and specialized policies, COMPASS is able to outperform state-of-the-art RL approaches on a range of standard benchmark tasks and also generalize better to new problem instances.
The key contribution of this work is the insight that anticipating the need for performant search at inference time during the pre-training phase can lead to more effective heuristics for solving these NP-hard problems. While the paper demonstrates the strong performance of COMPASS, there are still open questions around its computational efficiency and broader applicability that warrant further research.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the use of Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization, and the authors' approach offers a promising direction for the design of more versatile and robust solvers for real-world optimization challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Robust Optimization in Protein Fitness Landscapes Using Reinforcement Learning in Latent Space
Minji Lee, Luiz Felipe Vecchietti, Hyunkyu Jung, Hyun Joo Ro, Meeyoung Cha, Ho Min Kim
0
0
Proteins are complex molecules responsible for different functions in nature. Enhancing the functionality of proteins and cellular fitness can significantly impact various industries. However, protein optimization using computational methods remains challenging, especially when starting from low-fitness sequences. We propose LatProtRL, an optimization method to efficiently traverse a latent space learned by an encoder-decoder leveraging a large protein language model. To escape local optima, our optimization is modeled as a Markov decision process using reinforcement learning acting directly in latent space. We evaluate our approach on two important fitness optimization tasks, demonstrating its ability to achieve comparable or superior fitness over baseline methods. Our findings and in vitro evaluation show that the generated sequences can reach high-fitness regions, suggesting a substantial potential of LatProtRL in lab-in-the-loop scenarios.
5/30/2024
Representation Learning For Efficient Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Dom Huh, Prasant Mohapatra
0
0
Sample efficiency remains a key challenge in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). A promising approach is to learn a meaningful latent representation space through auxiliary learning objectives alongside the MARL objective to aid in learning a successful control policy. In our work, we present MAPO-LSO (Multi-Agent Policy Optimization with Latent Space Optimization) which applies a form of comprehensive representation learning devised to supplement MARL training. Specifically, MAPO-LSO proposes a multi-agent extension of transition dynamics reconstruction and self-predictive learning that constructs a latent state optimization scheme that can be trivially extended to current state-of-the-art MARL algorithms. Empirical results demonstrate MAPO-LSO to show notable improvements in sample efficiency and learning performance compared to its vanilla MARL counterpart without any additional MARL hyperparameter tuning on a diverse suite of MARL tasks.
6/6/2024
Memory-Enhanced Neural Solvers for Efficient Adaptation in Combinatorial Optimization
Felix Chalumeau, Refiloe Shabe, Noah de Nicola, Arnu Pretorius, Thomas D. Barrett, Nathan Grinsztajn
0
0
Combinatorial Optimization is crucial to numerous real-world applications, yet still presents challenges due to its (NP-)hard nature. Amongst existing approaches, heuristics often offer the best trade-off between quality and scalability, making them suitable for industrial use. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers a flexible framework for designing heuristics, its adoption over handcrafted heuristics remains incomplete within industrial solvers. Existing learned methods still lack the ability to adapt to specific instances and fully leverage the available computational budget. The current best methods either rely on a collection of pre-trained policies, or on data-inefficient fine-tuning; hence failing to fully utilize newly available information within the constraints of the budget. In response, we present MEMENTO, an RL approach that leverages memory to improve the adaptation of neural solvers at inference time. MEMENTO enables updating the action distribution dynamically based on the outcome of previous decisions. We validate its effectiveness on benchmark problems, in particular Traveling Salesman and Capacitated Vehicle Routing, demonstrating it can successfully be combined with standard methods to boost their performance under a given budget, both in and out-of-distribution, improving their performance on all 12 evaluated tasks.
6/26/2024
Planning with a Learned Policy Basis to Optimally Solve Complex Tasks
Guillermo Infante, David Kuric, Anders Jonsson, Vicenc{c} G'omez, Herke van Hoof
0
0
Conventional reinforcement learning (RL) methods can successfully solve a wide range of sequential decision problems. However, learning policies that can generalize predictably across multiple tasks in a setting with non-Markovian reward specifications is a challenging problem. We propose to use successor features to learn a policy basis so that each (sub)policy in it solves a well-defined subproblem. In a task described by a finite state automaton (FSA) that involves the same set of subproblems, the combination of these (sub)policies can then be used to generate an optimal solution without additional learning. In contrast to other methods that combine (sub)policies via planning, our method asymptotically attains global optimality, even in stochastic environments.
6/4/2024