Seek and Solve Reasoning for Table Question Answering
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Research paper proposes a new "Seek and Solve" reasoning approach for table question answering (TQA)
- Aims to improve language model's ability to understand and reason about information in tables
- Introduces techniques to help models better locate relevant information and perform necessary reasoning steps
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach called "Seek and Solve" for helping language models answer questions about information stored in tables. Tables can be difficult for AI systems to understand, as they require the model to locate the relevant information, and then perform logical reasoning to arrive at the correct answer.
The "Seek and Solve" method tries to improve this process. It first has the model identify the most important parts of the table that are relevant to answering the question. This "seeking" step helps the model focus in on the key information it needs.
Then, the model goes through a "solving" step, where it reasons about the relevant parts of the table and generates the final answer. The paper introduces various techniques to support this seeking and solving process, aiming to make language models better at understanding and reasoning about tabular data.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "Seek and Solve" framework to improve table question answering (TQA) with language models. The key innovation is a two-stage process:
-
Seek: The model first identifies the most relevant parts of the table to the given question. This "seeking" stage helps the model focus on the most important information it needs to answer the question.
-
Solve: The model then reasons about the relevant parts of the table to generate the final answer. The "solving" stage applies various techniques to support the logical reasoning process.
The paper introduces several methods to implement this Seek and Solve approach:
- Relevant Cell Identification: Models are trained to predict which table cells contain information most relevant to the question.
- Reasoning Path Generation: Models generate a sequence of reasoning steps to connect the relevant cells and arrive at the answer.
- Constrained Decoding: The answer generation is constrained to ensure it is consistent with the relevant table information.
Experiments on benchmark TQA datasets show this Seek and Solve framework outperforms prior table reasoning approaches. The authors argue it helps language models better understand and utilize tabular data to answer complex questions.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a convincing case for the benefits of the Seek and Solve approach, demonstrating improvements over prior TQA methods on standard benchmarks. However, a few caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:
- The experiments are limited to a specific set of TQA datasets, so the generalizability to other types of tables and questions remains to be seen.
- The proposed techniques, while effective, add significant complexity to the language model architecture and training process. The tradeoffs in terms of computational cost and training time are not fully explored.
- The paper does not delve into potential biases or failure modes of the Seek and Solve approach. Further analysis on edge cases and robustness would help assess its real-world applicability.
Overall, the research represents an important step forward in enhancing language models' ability to reason about tabular data. Continued advancements in this area could lead to more capable AI assistants that can better understand and utilize structured information.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "Seek and Solve" approach to improve table question answering with language models. By having the model first identify the most relevant parts of the table, and then reason over those parts to generate the answer, the framework demonstrates improved performance on benchmark datasets.
While the techniques add complexity, the research represents an important step forward in enhancing language models' ability to understand and reason about structured, tabular data. Further advancements in this area could lead to more capable AI assistants that can better leverage the wealth of information stored in tables and spreadsheets.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Seek and Solve Reasoning for Table Question Answering
Ruya Jiang, Chun Wang, Weihong Deng
Table-based Question Answering (TQA) involves answering questions based on tabular data. The complexity of table structures and question logic makes this task difficult even for Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper improves TQA performance by leveraging LLMs' reasoning capabilities. Inspired by how humans solve TQA tasks, we propose a Seek-and-Solve pipeline that instructs the LLM to first seek relevant information and then answer questions. The two stages are integrated at the reasoning level, and their Chain of Thought (CoT) paths are integrated into a coherent Seek-and-Solve CoT (SS-CoT). Furthermore, we present a compact single-stage TQA-solving prompt distilled from the pipeline. Experiments demonstrate that under In-Context Learning settings, using samples with SS-CoT paths as demonstrations, the TQA-solving prompt can effectively guide the LLM to solve complex TQA tasks, resulting in improved performance and reliability. Our results highlight the importance of properly eliciting LLMs' reasoning capabilities in solving complex TQA tasks.
Read more9/10/2024
0
On the Robustness of Language Models for Tabular Question Answering
Kushal Raj Bhandari, Sixue Xing, Soham Dan, Jianxi Gao
Large Language Models (LLMs), originally shown to ace various text comprehension tasks have also remarkably been shown to tackle table comprehension tasks without specific training. While previous research has explored LLM capabilities with tabular dataset tasks, our study assesses the influence of $textit{in-context learning}$,$ textit{model scale}$, $textit{instruction tuning}$, and $textit{domain biases}$ on Tabular Question Answering (TQA). We evaluate the robustness of LLMs on Wikipedia-based $textbf{WTQ}$ and financial report-based $textbf{TAT-QA}$ TQA datasets, focusing on their ability to robustly interpret tabular data under various augmentations and perturbations. Our findings indicate that instructions significantly enhance performance, with recent models like Llama3 exhibiting greater robustness over earlier versions. However, data contamination and practical reliability issues persist, especially with WTQ. We highlight the need for improved methodologies, including structure-aware self-attention mechanisms and better handling of domain-specific tabular data, to develop more reliable LLMs for table comprehension.
Read more6/19/2024
0
TTQA-RS- A break-down prompting approach for Multi-hop Table-Text Question Answering with Reasoning and Summarization
Jayetri Bardhan, Bushi Xiao, Daisy Zhe Wang
Question answering (QA) over tables and text has gained much popularity over the years. Multi-hop table-text QA requires multiple hops between the table and text, making it a challenging QA task. Although several works have attempted to solve the table-text QA task, most involve training the models and requiring labeled data. In this paper, we have proposed a model - TTQA-RS: A break-down prompting approach for Multi-hop Table-Text Question Answering with Reasoning and Summarization. Our model uses augmented knowledge including table-text summary with decomposed sub-question with answer for a reasoning-based table-text QA. Using open-source language models our model outperformed all existing prompting methods for table-text QA tasks on existing table-text QA datasets like HybridQA and OTT-QA's development set. Our results are comparable with the training-based state-of-the-art models, demonstrating the potential of prompt-based approaches using open-source LLMs. Additionally, by using GPT-4 with LLaMA3-70B, our model achieved state-of-the-art performance for prompting-based methods on multi-hop table-text QA.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Enhancing Temporal Understanding in LLMs for Semi-structured Tables
Irwin Deng, Kushagra Dixit, Vivek Gupta, Dan Roth
Temporal reasoning over tabular data presents substantial challenges for large language models (LLMs), as evidenced by recent research. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of temporal datasets to pinpoint the specific limitations of LLMs. Our investigation leads to enhancements in TempTabQA, a dataset specifically designed for tabular temporal question answering. We provide critical insights for improving LLM performance in temporal reasoning tasks with tabular data. Furthermore, we introduce a novel approach, C.L.E.A.R to strengthen LLM capabilities in this domain. Our findings demonstrate that our method significantly improves evidence-based reasoning across various models. Additionally, our experimental results reveal that indirect supervision with auxiliary data substantially boosts model performance in these tasks. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of LLMs' temporal reasoning abilities over tabular data and promotes advancements in their application across diverse fields.
Read more7/24/2024