A Semantic Framework for Neural-Symbolic Computing
2212.12050
0
0
š
Abstract
Two approaches to AI, neural networks and symbolic systems, have been proven very successful for an array of AI problems. However, neither has been able to achieve the general reasoning ability required for human-like intelligence. It has been argued that this is due to inherent weaknesses in each approach. Luckily, these weaknesses appear to be complementary, with symbolic systems being adept at the kinds of things neural networks have trouble with and vice-versa. The field of neural-symbolic AI attempts to exploit this asymmetry by combining neural networks and symbolic AI into integrated systems. Often this has been done by encoding symbolic knowledge into neural networks. Unfortunately, although many different methods for this have been proposed, there is no common definition of an encoding to compare them. We seek to rectify this problem by introducing a semantic framework for neural-symbolic AI, which is then shown to be general enough to account for a large family of neural-symbolic systems. We provide a number of examples and proofs of the application of the framework to the neural encoding of various forms of knowledge representation and neural network. These, at first sight disparate approaches, are all shown to fall within the framework's formal definition of what we call semantic encoding for neural-symbolic AI.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the combination of neural networks and symbolic AI, known as neural-symbolic AI, to address the limitations of each approach in achieving human-like general reasoning ability.
- It proposes a semantic framework to provide a common definition for the ways in which symbolic knowledge can be encoded into neural networks, unifying various existing neural-symbolic approaches.
- The framework is shown to be general enough to account for a range of neural-symbolic systems, from encoding knowledge graphs into neural networks to combining logic-based reasoning with neural networks.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks and symbolic AI systems have both been very successful in solving many AI problems. However, neither approach has been able to achieve the broad, flexible reasoning ability that humans possess. This is believed to be due to inherent weaknesses in each approach.
Fortunately, these weaknesses appear to be complementary - the things that neural networks struggle with are often the strengths of symbolic AI systems, and vice versa. The field of neural-symbolic AI aims to exploit this asymmetry by combining the two approaches into integrated systems.
One common way to do this is by encoding symbolic knowledge, such as knowledge graphs or logical rules, into neural networks. This allows the neural network to leverage the strengths of symbolic reasoning while still benefiting from the pattern-recognition capabilities of neural networks.
However, there has been no common definition of what it means to "encode" symbolic knowledge into a neural network. This paper seeks to address this by introducing a semantic framework that can describe and unify the various ways that this encoding has been done in the past.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a semantic framework for neural-symbolic AI that can formally define the process of encoding symbolic knowledge into neural networks. This framework is general enough to encompass a wide range of existing neural-symbolic approaches, from knowledge graph embedding to neural logic programming.
At the core of the framework is the concept of a "semantic encoding" - a mapping between symbolic knowledge representations and the internal parameters of a neural network. The paper provides a formal definition of this mapping and shows how it can be applied to different forms of symbolic knowledge, such as ontologies, rules, and concepts.
Using this framework, the authors analyze and categorize various neural-symbolic systems proposed in the literature. They demonstrate how these seemingly disparate approaches can all be understood as instantiations of the semantic encoding framework, revealing the underlying unity in the field.
Critical Analysis
The proposed semantic framework is a valuable contribution to the field of neural-symbolic AI, as it provides a unifying theoretical foundation for the different ways in which symbolic knowledge can be encoded into neural networks.
However, the framework is primarily focused on the encoding process itself and does not address some of the practical challenges in implementing effective neural-symbolic systems. For example, the framework does not consider issues such as the scalability of the encoding process, the impact of noise or uncertainty in the input data, or the interpretability of the resulting neural-symbolic models.
Additionally, while the framework is general enough to encompass a wide range of existing approaches, it remains to be seen how well it can accommodate future developments in the field. As new methods for combining neural networks and symbolic AI continue to emerge, the framework may need to be extended or refined to maintain its relevance.
Conclusion
This paper presents a semantic framework for neural-symbolic AI that provides a formal definition of the process of encoding symbolic knowledge into neural networks. By unifying a diverse range of existing neural-symbolic approaches under a common theoretical framework, the authors have made a significant contribution to the field, laying the groundwork for a more coherent and principled understanding of the integration of neural and symbolic AI.
While the framework has its limitations, it represents an important step towards realizing the potential of neural-symbolic systems to achieve human-like general reasoning capabilities, which could have far-reaching implications for the future of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š ļø
Exploring knowledge graph-based neural-symbolic system from application perspective
Shenzhe Zhu, Shengxiang Sun
0
0
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep neural networks have driven significant progress in vision and text processing. However, achieving human-like reasoning and interpretability in AI systems remains a substantial challenge. The Neural-Symbolic paradigm, which integrates neural networks with symbolic systems, presents a promising pathway toward more interpretable AI. Within this paradigm, Knowledge Graphs (KG) are crucial, offering a structured and dynamic method for representing knowledge through interconnected entities and relationships, typically as triples (subject, predicate, object). This paper explores recent advancements in neural-symbolic integration based on KG, examining how it supports integration in three categories: enhancing the reasoning and interpretability of neural networks with symbolic knowledge (Symbol for Neural), refining the completeness and accuracy of symbolic systems via neural network methodologies (Neural for Symbol), and facilitating their combined application in Hybrid Neural-Symbolic Integration. It highlights current trends and proposes future research directions in Neural-Symbolic AI.
5/31/2024
SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers
Marius-Constantin Dinu, Claudiu Leoveanu-Condrei, Markus Holzleitner, Werner Zellinger, Sepp Hochreiter
0
0
We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. SymbolicAI enables the seamless integration of generative models with a diverse range of solvers by treating large language models (LLMs) as semantic parsers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions, thus bridging the gap between symbolic reasoning and generative AI. We leverage probabilistic programming principles to tackle complex tasks, and utilize differentiable and classical programming paradigms with their respective strengths. The framework introduces a set of polymorphic, compositional, and self-referential operations for multi-modal data that connects multi-step generative processes and aligns their outputs with user objectives in complex workflows. As a result, we can transition between the capabilities of various foundation models with in-context learning capabilities and specialized, fine-tuned models or solvers proficient in addressing specific problems. Through these operations based on in-context learning our framework enables the creation and evaluation of explainable computational graphs. Finally, we introduce a quality measure and its empirical score for evaluating these computational graphs, and propose a benchmark that compares various state-of-the-art LLMs across a set of complex workflows. We refer to the empirical score as the Vector Embedding for Relational Trajectory Evaluation through Cross-similarity, or VERTEX score for short. The framework codebase and benchmark are linked below.
5/28/2024
š¤
Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey
Lauren Nicole DeLong (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Ramon Fern'andez Mir (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Jacques D. Fleuriot (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute)
0
0
Neurosymbolic AI is an increasingly active area of research that combines symbolic reasoning methods with deep learning to leverage their complementary benefits. As knowledge graphs are becoming a popular way to represent heterogeneous and multi-relational data, methods for reasoning on graph structures have attempted to follow this neurosymbolic paradigm. Traditionally, such approaches have utilized either rule-based inference or generated representative numerical embeddings from which patterns could be extracted. However, several recent studies have attempted to bridge this dichotomy to generate models that facilitate interpretability, maintain competitive performance, and integrate expert knowledge. Therefore, we survey methods that perform neurosymbolic reasoning tasks on knowledge graphs and propose a novel taxonomy by which we can classify them. Specifically, we propose three major categories: (1) logically-informed embedding approaches, (2) embedding approaches with logical constraints, and (3) rule learning approaches. Alongside the taxonomy, we provide a tabular overview of the approaches and links to their source code, if available, for more direct comparison. Finally, we discuss the unique characteristics and limitations of these methods, then propose several prospective directions toward which this field of research could evolve.
5/17/2024
Towards a fully declarative neuro-symbolic language
Tilman Hinnerichs, Robin Manhaeve, Giuseppe Marra, Sebastijan Dumancic
0
0
Neuro-symbolic systems (NeSy), which claim to combine the best of both learning and reasoning capabilities of artificial intelligence, are missing a core property of reasoning systems: Declarativeness. The lack of declarativeness is caused by the functional nature of neural predicates inherited from neural networks. We propose and implement a general framework for fully declarative neural predicates, which hence extends to fully declarative NeSy frameworks. We first show that the declarative extension preserves the learning and reasoning capabilities while being able to answer arbitrary queries while only being trained on a single query type.
7/2/2024