SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers
2402.00854
0
0
Abstract
We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. SymbolicAI enables the seamless integration of generative models with a diverse range of solvers by treating large language models (LLMs) as semantic parsers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions, thus bridging the gap between symbolic reasoning and generative AI. We leverage probabilistic programming principles to tackle complex tasks, and utilize differentiable and classical programming paradigms with their respective strengths. The framework introduces a set of polymorphic, compositional, and self-referential operations for multi-modal data that connects multi-step generative processes and aligns their outputs with user objectives in complex workflows. As a result, we can transition between the capabilities of various foundation models with in-context learning capabilities and specialized, fine-tuned models or solvers proficient in addressing specific problems. Through these operations based on in-context learning our framework enables the creation and evaluation of explainable computational graphs. Finally, we introduce a quality measure and its empirical score for evaluating these computational graphs, and propose a benchmark that compares various state-of-the-art LLMs across a set of complex workflows. We refer to the empirical score as the Vector Embedding for Relational Trajectory Evaluation through Cross-similarity, or VERTEX score for short. The framework codebase and benchmark are linked below.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper introduces SymbolicAI, a framework for combining generative models and solvers to enable logic-based approaches in artificial intelligence. ā¢ The framework aims to leverage the strengths of both symbolic and neural methods to tackle complex problems that require reasoning, knowledge representation, and decision-making. ā¢ By integrating generative models and solvers, SymbolicAI seeks to bridge the gap between the expressive power of symbolic systems and the flexibility and learning capabilities of neural networks.
Plain English Explanation
ā¢ SymbolicAI is a new approach that tries to combine the best of two different AI techniques: symbolic methods and neural networks. ā¢ Symbolic methods are good at reasoning, representing knowledge, and making decisions, but can be inflexible. Neural networks are flexible and can learn from data, but can struggle with complex reasoning tasks. ā¢ The SymbolicAI framework aims to bring these two approaches together, using generative models (a type of neural network) to generate candidate solutions, and then using solvers (symbolic systems) to evaluate and refine those solutions. ā¢ By combining these techniques, the researchers hope to create AI systems that can handle complex problems that require both flexible learning and robust reasoning abilities.
Technical Explanation
ā¢ The SymbolicAI framework integrates generative models, which can learn patterns from data and generate new solutions, with symbolic solvers, which can reason about and validate those solutions using formal logic. ā¢ The generative model is used to generate candidate solutions to a problem, which are then passed to the solver for evaluation and refinement. ā¢ The solver can provide feedback to the generative model, guiding it to produce more promising solutions in an iterative process. ā¢ This combination of neural and symbolic methods aims to leverage the strengths of both approaches, allowing the system to learn from data while also reasoning about complex problems in a more principled, logic-based way.
Critical Analysis
ā¢ While the SymbolicAI framework presents a promising approach to combining neural and symbolic methods, the paper does not provide detailed experimental results or evaluation of the framework's performance on real-world tasks. ā¢ The authors acknowledge that further research is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of the framework, as well as to explore how it can be applied to specific problem domains. ā¢ [Link to "investigating-symbolic-capabilities-large-language-models"]: One potential area for further exploration is the use of large language models, which have shown some [link] symbolic reasoning capabilities, as part of the SymbolicAI framework. ā¢ [Link to "semantic-objective-functions-distribution-aware-method-adding"]: Additionally, the authors may want to consider incorporating techniques for [link] distribution-aware objective functions, which could help the generative model better align with the solver's requirements.
Conclusion
ā¢ The SymbolicAI framework represents a promising approach to integrating neural and symbolic methods in AI, with the potential to tackle complex problems that require both flexible learning and robust reasoning. ā¢ By leveraging the strengths of both neural and symbolic techniques, the framework aims to create AI systems that can more effectively represent, reason about, and solve real-world problems. ā¢ While further research is needed to fully evaluate the framework's capabilities, this work contributes to the ongoing [link to "neurosymbolic-ai-reasoning-over-knowledge-graphs-survey"] [link to "exploring-knowledge-graph-based-neural-symbolic-system"] developments in the field of neuro-symbolic AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Symbolic Learning Enables Self-Evolving Agents
Wangchunshu Zhou, Yixin Ou, Shengwei Ding, Long Li, Jialong Wu, Tiannan Wang, Jiamin Chen, Shuai Wang, Xiaohua Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Huajun Chen, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang
0
0
The AI community has been exploring a pathway to artificial general intelligence (AGI) by developing language agents, which are complex large language models (LLMs) pipelines involving both prompting techniques and tool usage methods. While language agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for many real-world tasks, a fundamental limitation of current language agents research is that they are model-centric, or engineering-centric. That's to say, the progress on prompts, tools, and pipelines of language agents requires substantial manual engineering efforts from human experts rather than automatically learning from data. We believe the transition from model-centric, or engineering-centric, to data-centric, i.e., the ability of language agents to autonomously learn and evolve in environments, is the key for them to possibly achieve AGI. In this work, we introduce agent symbolic learning, a systematic framework that enables language agents to optimize themselves on their own in a data-centric way using symbolic optimizers. Specifically, we consider agents as symbolic networks where learnable weights are defined by prompts, tools, and the way they are stacked together. Agent symbolic learning is designed to optimize the symbolic network within language agents by mimicking two fundamental algorithms in connectionist learning: back-propagation and gradient descent. Instead of dealing with numeric weights, agent symbolic learning works with natural language simulacrums of weights, loss, and gradients. We conduct proof-of-concept experiments on both standard benchmarks and complex real-world tasks and show that agent symbolic learning enables language agents to update themselves after being created and deployed in the wild, resulting in self-evolving agents.
6/27/2024
š¤
Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey
Lauren Nicole DeLong (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Ramon Fern'andez Mir (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Jacques D. Fleuriot (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute)
0
0
Neurosymbolic AI is an increasingly active area of research that combines symbolic reasoning methods with deep learning to leverage their complementary benefits. As knowledge graphs are becoming a popular way to represent heterogeneous and multi-relational data, methods for reasoning on graph structures have attempted to follow this neurosymbolic paradigm. Traditionally, such approaches have utilized either rule-based inference or generated representative numerical embeddings from which patterns could be extracted. However, several recent studies have attempted to bridge this dichotomy to generate models that facilitate interpretability, maintain competitive performance, and integrate expert knowledge. Therefore, we survey methods that perform neurosymbolic reasoning tasks on knowledge graphs and propose a novel taxonomy by which we can classify them. Specifically, we propose three major categories: (1) logically-informed embedding approaches, (2) embedding approaches with logical constraints, and (3) rule learning approaches. Alongside the taxonomy, we provide a tabular overview of the approaches and links to their source code, if available, for more direct comparison. Finally, we discuss the unique characteristics and limitations of these methods, then propose several prospective directions toward which this field of research could evolve.
5/17/2024
š ļø
Exploring knowledge graph-based neural-symbolic system from application perspective
Shenzhe Zhu, Shengxiang Sun
0
0
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep neural networks have driven significant progress in vision and text processing. However, achieving human-like reasoning and interpretability in AI systems remains a substantial challenge. The Neural-Symbolic paradigm, which integrates neural networks with symbolic systems, presents a promising pathway toward more interpretable AI. Within this paradigm, Knowledge Graphs (KG) are crucial, offering a structured and dynamic method for representing knowledge through interconnected entities and relationships, typically as triples (subject, predicate, object). This paper explores recent advancements in neural-symbolic integration based on KG, examining how it supports integration in three categories: enhancing the reasoning and interpretability of neural networks with symbolic knowledge (Symbol for Neural), refining the completeness and accuracy of symbolic systems via neural network methodologies (Neural for Symbol), and facilitating their combined application in Hybrid Neural-Symbolic Integration. It highlights current trends and proposes future research directions in Neural-Symbolic AI.
5/31/2024
š¤
Intersymbolic AI: Interlinking Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI
Andr'e Platzer
0
0
This perspective piece calls for the study of the new field of Intersymbolic AI, by which we mean the combination of symbolic AI, whose building blocks have inherent significance/meaning, with subsymbolic AI, whose entirety creates significance/effect despite the fact that individual building blocks escape meaning. Canonical kinds of symbolic AI are logic, games and planning. Canonical kinds of subsymbolic AI are (un)supervised machine and reinforcement learning. Intersymbolic AI interlinks the worlds of symbolic AI with its compositional symbolic significance and meaning and of subsymbolic AI with its summative significance or effect to enable culminations of insights from both worlds by going between and across symbolic AI insights with subsymbolic AI techniques that are being helped by symbolic AI principles. For example, Intersymbolic AI may start with symbolic AI to understand a dynamic system, continue with subsymbolic AI to learn its control, and end with symbolic AI to safely use the outcome of the learned subsymbolic AI controller in the dynamic system. Intersymbolic AI combines both symbolic and subsymbolic AI to increase the effectiveness of AI compared to either kind of AI alone, in much the same way that the combination of both conscious and subconscious thought increases the effectiveness of human thought compared to either kind of thought alone. Some successful contributions to the Intersymbolic AI paradigm are surveyed here but many more are considered possible by advancing Intersymbolic AI.
6/18/2024