Sequential Kernelized Stein Discrepancy
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new method called Sequential Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (SKSD) for efficiently evaluating the goodness-of-fit of a probability distribution.
- SKSD builds upon the Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD) framework, which is a powerful tool for assessing how well a probability distribution matches the true underlying distribution.
- The key innovation in SKSD is the use of a sequential testing approach, which allows the method to operate in an online setting and make decisions incrementally as new data becomes available.
Plain English Explanation
Evaluating how well a probability distribution matches the true underlying distribution is an important problem in machine learning and statistics. The Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD) is a effective approach for this task, but it requires processing all the data at once.
The Sequential Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (SKSD) method introduced in this paper improves upon KSD by using a sequential testing approach. This means SKSD can make decisions about the goodness-of-fit incrementally as new data becomes available, without needing to see all the data upfront.
This sequential approach has several advantages. It allows SKSD to operate in an online setting, where data is collected and processed over time. It also makes the method more efficient in terms of memory and computation, since it doesn't need to store or process all the data at once.
Overall, SKSD provides a flexible and scalable way to evaluate probability distributions, with applications in areas like density estimation, model selection, and anomaly detection.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the Sequential Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (SKSD), a method for efficiently evaluating the goodness-of-fit of a probability distribution in an online setting. SKSD builds upon the Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD) framework, which provides a principled way to measure the difference between a candidate distribution and the true underlying distribution.
The key innovation in SKSD is the use of a sequential testing approach. Instead of processing all the data at once like KSD, SKSD can make decisions about the goodness-of-fit incrementally as new data becomes available. This allows SKSD to operate in an online setting and makes it more memory- and computation-efficient.
The paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis of SKSD, including proofs of its statistical properties such as consistency and asymptotic normality. The authors also present empirical results demonstrating SKSD's advantages over batch-based KSD on a range of synthetic and real-world benchmarks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the SKSD method, and the results suggest it is a promising approach for online goodness-of-fit testing. However, the authors do not extensively discuss the limitations or potential downsides of the method.
One area that could be explored further is the sensitivity of SKSD to the choice of kernel function and other hyperparameters. The performance of KSD-based methods can be quite sensitive to these choices, and the authors only briefly mention this issue.
Additionally, the paper does not compare SKSD to other sequential or online goodness-of-fit testing methods beyond the batch-based KSD. It would be valuable to understand how SKSD performs relative to alternative approaches designed for incremental or streaming data.
Overall, the paper makes a solid contribution by introducing a novel and effective method for online distribution evaluation. Further research exploring the method's robustness and comparing it to a wider range of alternatives could help solidify its place in the toolbox of machine learning practitioners.
Conclusion
The Sequential Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (SKSD) presented in this paper is a valuable addition to the toolkit for assessing the goodness-of-fit of probability distributions. By leveraging a sequential testing approach, SKSD can operate efficiently in online settings and make incremental decisions about the quality of a distribution fit.
The theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrate SKSD's strong performance compared to batch-based methods. This suggests SKSD could have wide-ranging applications in areas like density estimation, model selection, and anomaly detection, where incremental evaluation of distributions is important.
While the paper provides a solid foundation for SKSD, further research exploring its robustness and comparing it to other online goodness-of-fit methods could help solidify its place in the machine learning landscape. Overall, this work represents an interesting and impactful contribution to the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Sequential Kernelized Stein Discrepancy
Diego Martinez-Taboada, Aaditya Ramdas
We present a sequential version of the kernelized Stein discrepancy, which allows for conducting goodness-of-fit tests for unnormalized densities that are continuously monitored and adaptively stopped. That is, the sample size need not be fixed prior to data collection; the practitioner can choose whether to stop the test or continue to gather evidence at any time while controlling the false discovery rate. In stark contrast to related literature, we do not impose uniform boundedness on the Stein kernel. Instead, we exploit the potential boundedness of the Stein kernel at arbitrary point evaluations to define test martingales, that give way to the subsequent novel sequential tests. We prove the validity of the test, as well as an asymptotic lower bound for the logarithmic growth of the wealth process under the alternative. We further illustrate the empirical performance of the test with a variety of distributions, including restricted Boltzmann machines.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Nystrom Kernel Stein Discrepancy
Florian Kalinke, Zoltan Szabo, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
Kernel methods underpin many of the most successful approaches in data science and statistics, and they allow representing probability measures as elements of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space without loss of information. Recently, the kernel Stein discrepancy (KSD), which combines Stein's method with kernel techniques, gained considerable attention. Through the Stein operator, KSD allows the construction of powerful goodness-of-fit tests where it is sufficient to know the target distribution up to a multiplicative constant. However, the typical U- and V-statistic-based KSD estimators suffer from a quadratic runtime complexity, which hinders their application in large-scale settings. In this work, we propose a Nystrom-based KSD acceleration -- with runtime $mathcal O!left(mn+m^3right)$ for $n$ samples and $mll n$ Nystrom points -- , show its $sqrt{n}$-consistency under the null with a classical sub-Gaussian assumption, and demonstrate its applicability for goodness-of-fit testing on a suite of benchmarks.
Read more7/26/2024
0
On the Robustness of Kernel Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Xing Liu, Franc{c}ois-Xavier Briol
Goodness-of-fit testing is often criticized for its lack of practical relevance; since ``all models are wrong'', the null hypothesis that the data conform to our model is ultimately always rejected when the sample size is large enough. Despite this, probabilistic models are still used extensively, raising the more pertinent question of whether the model is good enough for a specific task. This question can be formalized as a robust goodness-of-fit testing problem by asking whether the data were generated by a distribution corresponding to our model up to some mild perturbation. In this paper, we show that existing kernel goodness-of-fit tests are not robust according to common notions of robustness including qualitative and quantitative robustness. We also show that robust techniques based on tilted kernels from the parameter estimation literature are not sufficient for ensuring both types of robustness in the context of goodness-of-fit testing. We therefore propose the first robust kernel goodness-of-fit test which resolves this open problem using kernel Stein discrepancy balls, which encompass perturbation models such as Huber contamination models and density uncertainty bands.
Read more8/26/2024
✅
0
Debiased Distribution Compression
Lingxiao Li, Raaz Dwivedi, Lester Mackey
Modern compression methods can summarize a target distribution $mathbb{P}$ more succinctly than i.i.d. sampling but require access to a low-bias input sequence like a Markov chain converging quickly to $mathbb{P}$. We introduce a new suite of compression methods suitable for compression with biased input sequences. Given $n$ points targeting the wrong distribution and quadratic time, Stein kernel thinning (SKT) returns $sqrt{n}$ equal-weighted points with $widetilde{O}(n^{-1/2})$ maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to $mathbb{P}$. For larger-scale compression tasks, low-rank SKT achieves the same feat in sub-quadratic time using an adaptive low-rank debiasing procedure that may be of independent interest. For downstream tasks that support simplex or constant-preserving weights, Stein recombination and Stein Cholesky achieve even greater parsimony, matching the guarantees of SKT with as few as $text{poly-log}(n)$ weighted points. Underlying these advances are new guarantees for the quality of simplex-weighted coresets, the spectral decay of kernel matrices, and the covering numbers of Stein kernel Hilbert spaces. In our experiments, our techniques provide succinct and accurate posterior summaries while overcoming biases due to burn-in, approximate Markov chain Monte Carlo, and tempering.
Read more8/2/2024