Sequential three-way group decision-making for double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel sequential three-way group decision-making (SGDM) approach for handling double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (DH-HFLTSs) in group decision-making (GDM) problems.
- The proposed SGDM method involves a three-stage process: individual evaluation, group consensus, and group decision, with the aim of achieving a satisfactory collective decision.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through a numerical example and comparative analysis with existing GDM methods.
Plain English Explanation
In group decision-making, it's often challenging to reach a consensus when group members have different preferences and opinions. This paper introduces a new method called "sequential three-way group decision-making" that can help address this issue.
The key idea is to break down the decision-making process into three stages:
-
Individual evaluation: Each group member provides their individual assessment of the decision options using a special type of fuzzy linguistic information called "double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets."
-
Group consensus: The group then works together to try and reach a consensus on the decision, using a structured process to reconcile the different individual assessments.
-
Group decision: Finally, the group makes a collective decision based on the consensus reached in the previous stage.
The authors demonstrate that this sequential approach can be more effective than traditional group decision-making methods, as it helps ensure that all group members' perspectives are considered and that the final decision is well-supported by the group. They provide a numerical example to illustrate how the method works in practice and compare it to other existing approaches.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a sequential three-way group decision-making (SGDM) method for handling double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (DH-HFLTSs) in group decision-making (GDM) problems.
The SGDM method consists of three main stages:
-
Individual evaluation: Each decision-maker (DM) provides their individual assessment of the decision alternatives using DH-HFLTSs, which can capture the DMs' hesitancy and preferences more accurately than traditional linguistic term sets.
-
Group consensus: The group then works to reach a consensus on the decision through an iterative negotiation process. This involves aggregating the individual DH-HFLTS assessments and identifying any areas of disagreement or conflict.
-
Group decision: Finally, the group makes a collective decision based on the consensus reached in the previous stage. This decision is represented using a DH-HFLTS that reflects the group's collective preference.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their SGDM approach through a numerical example and a comparative analysis with other GDM methods, such as two-stage ML-guided decision rules and multi-group learning with hierarchical groups. The results show that the SGDM method can help groups reach more satisfactory collective decisions, particularly when dealing with complex, uncertain, and heterogeneous preferences.
Critical Analysis
The authors have presented a novel and promising approach to group decision-making, addressing the challenges of reaching consensus when group members have diverse preferences and uncertainties. The sequential three-way structure of the SGDM method, with its distinct stages of individual evaluation, group consensus, and group decision, seems to be a valuable contribution to the field of decision-making with large language models.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive discussion of the potential limitations or drawbacks of the proposed method. For example, the authors do not address how the SGDM method might perform in situations with a large number of decision alternatives or a very diverse set of group member preferences. Additionally, the computational complexity and scalability of the approach could be explored in more depth.
Furthermore, the paper would benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the theoretical foundations and underlying assumptions of the DH-HFLTS representation and the consensus-building process. A deeper examination of the implications and potential applications of this work would also strengthen the paper's contribution to the field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel sequential three-way group decision-making (SGDM) approach for handling double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (DH-HFLTSs) in group decision-making problems. The proposed method breaks down the decision-making process into three stages - individual evaluation, group consensus, and group decision - with the aim of achieving a satisfactory collective decision.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their SGDM method through a numerical example and comparative analysis with existing GDM approaches. The results suggest that the SGDM method can be a valuable tool for addressing the challenges of reaching consensus in group decision-making, particularly when group members have diverse preferences and uncertainties.
While the paper makes a promising contribution to the field, further research is needed to explore the theoretical foundations, limitations, and potential applications of the SGDM method more thoroughly. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the development of advanced decision-making techniques for complex, real-world scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Sequential three-way group decision-making for double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set
Nanfang Luo, Qinghua Zhang, Qin Xie, Yutai Wang, Longjun Yin, Guoyin Wang
Group decision-making (GDM) characterized by complexity and uncertainty is an essential part of various life scenarios. Most existing researches lack tools to fuse information quickly and interpret decision results for partially formed decisions. This limitation is particularly noticeable when there is a need to improve the efficiency of GDM. To address this issue, a novel multi-level sequential three-way decision for group decision-making (S3W-GDM) method is constructed from the perspective of granular computing. This method simultaneously considers the vagueness, hesitation, and variation of GDM problems under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (DHHFLTS) environment. First, for fusing information efficiently, a novel multi-level expert information fusion method is proposed, and the concepts of expert decision table and the extraction/aggregation of decision-leveled information based on the multi-level granularity are defined. Second, the neighborhood theory, outranking relation and regret theory (RT) are utilized to redesign the calculations of conditional probability and relative loss function. Then, the granular structure of DHHFLTS based on the sequential three-way decision (S3WD) is defined to improve the decision-making efficiency, and the decision-making strategy and interpretation of each decision-level are proposed. Furthermore, the algorithm of S3W-GDM is given. Finally, an illustrative example of diagnosis is presented, and the comparative and sensitivity analysis with other methods are performed to verify the efficiency and rationality of the proposed method.
Read more6/28/2024
0
Sentiment and Emotion-aware Multi-criteria Fuzzy Group Decision Making System
Adilet Yerkin, Pakizar Shamoi, Elnara Kadyrgali
In today's world, making decisions as a group is common, whether choosing a restaurant or deciding on a holiday destination. Group decision-making (GDM) systems play a crucial role by facilitating consensus among participants with diverse preferences. Discussions are one of the main tools people use to make decisions. When people discuss alternatives, they use natural language to express their opinions. Traditional GDM systems generally require participants to provide explicit opinion values to the system. However, in real-life scenarios, participants often express their opinions through some text (e.g., in comments, social media, messengers, etc.). This paper introduces a sentiment and emotion-aware multi-criteria fuzzy GDM system designed to enhance consensus-reaching effectiveness in group settings. This system incorporates natural language processing to analyze sentiments and emotions expressed in textual data, enabling an understanding of participant opinions besides the explicit numerical preference inputs. Once all the experts have provided their preferences for the alternatives, the individual preferences are aggregated into a single collective preference matrix. This matrix represents the collective expert opinion regarding the other options. Then, sentiments, emotions, and preference scores are inputted into a fuzzy inference system to get the overall score. The proposed system was used for a small decision-making process - choosing the hotel for a vacation by a group of friends. Our findings demonstrate that integrating sentiment and emotion analysis into GDM systems allows everyone's feelings and opinions to be considered during discussions and significantly improves consensus among participants.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Two-Stage ML-Guided Decision Rules for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty
Andrew Rosemberg, Alexandre Street, Davi M. Vallad~ao, Pascal Van Hentenryck
Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty (SDMU) is ubiquitous in many domains such as energy, finance, and supply chains. Some SDMU applications are naturally modeled as Multistage Stochastic Optimization Problems (MSPs), but the resulting optimizations are notoriously challenging from a computational standpoint. Under assumptions of convexity and stage-wise independence of the uncertainty, the resulting optimization can be solved efficiently using Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). Two-stage Linear Decision Rules (TS-LDRs) have been proposed to solve MSPs without the stage-wise independence assumption. TS-LDRs are computationally tractable, but using a policy that is a linear function of past observations is typically not suitable for non-convex environments arising, for example, in energy systems. This paper introduces a novel approach, Two-Stage General Decision Rules (TS-GDR), to generalize the policy space beyond linear functions, making them suitable for non-convex environments. TS-GDR is a self-supervised learning algorithm that trains the nonlinear decision rules using stochastic gradient descent (SGD); its forward passes solve the policy implementation optimization problems, and the backward passes leverage duality theory to obtain closed-form gradients. The effectiveness of TS-GDR is demonstrated through an instantiation using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks named Two-Stage Deep Decision Rules (TS-DDR). The method inherits the flexibility and computational performance of Deep Learning methodologies to solve SDMU problems generally tackled through large-scale optimization techniques. Applied to the Long-Term Hydrothermal Dispatch (LTHD) problem using actual power system data from Bolivia, the TS-DDR not only enhances solution quality but also significantly reduces computation times by several orders of magnitude.
Read more5/27/2024
0
A robust three-way classifier with shadowed granular-balls based on justifiable granularity
Jie Yang, Lingyun Xiaodiao, Guoyin Wang, Witold Pedrycz, Shuyin Xia, Qinghua Zhang, Di Wu
The granular-ball (GB)-based classifier introduced by Xia, exhibits adaptability in creating coarse-grained information granules for input, thereby enhancing its generality and flexibility. Nevertheless, the current GB-based classifiers rigidly assign a specific class label to each data instance and lacks of the necessary strategies to address uncertain instances. These far-fetched certain classification approachs toward uncertain instances may suffer considerable risks. To solve this problem, we construct a robust three-way classifier with shadowed GBs for uncertain data. Firstly, combine with information entropy, we propose an enhanced GB generation method with the principle of justifiable granularity. Subsequently, based on minimum uncertainty, a shadowed mapping is utilized to partition a GB into Core region, Important region and Unessential region. Based on the constructed shadowed GBs, we establish a three-way classifier to categorize data instances into certain classes and uncertain case. Finally, extensive comparative experiments are conducted with 2 three-way classifiers, 3 state-of-the-art GB-based classifiers, and 3 classical machine learning classifiers on 12 public benchmark datasets. The results show that our model demonstrates robustness in managing uncertain data and effectively mitigates classification risks. Furthermore, our model almost outperforms the other comparison methods in both effectiveness and efficiency.
Read more7/17/2024