Sentiment and Emotion-aware Multi-criteria Fuzzy Group Decision Making System
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Sentiment and emotion-aware multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making system
- Leverages sentiment and emotion data to enhance group decision making
- Proposes a framework for incorporating sentiment and emotion into a fuzzy group decision-making process
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a decision-making system that takes into account the sentiment and emotions of the people involved in the decision-making process. This is important because people's feelings and emotions can influence the choices they make, and ignoring these factors can lead to suboptimal decisions.
The system uses a fuzzy approach, which means it can handle the uncertainty and imprecision inherent in human decision-making. It also involves a group of decision-makers, rather than just a single individual, to bring in multiple perspectives and reduce the risk of bias.
By incorporating sentiment and emotion data, the system aims to make the decision-making process more holistic and reflective of the real-world factors that influence people's choices. This could lead to better decisions that are more aligned with the needs and preferences of the people affected by them.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a sentiment and emotion-aware multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making system. The system uses a fuzzy approach to handle the uncertainty and imprecision inherent in human decision-making, and it involves a group of decision-makers to bring in multiple perspectives.
The key innovation of the system is its ability to incorporate sentiment and emotion data into the decision-making process. The authors argue that these factors can significantly influence people's choices, and ignoring them can lead to suboptimal decisions.
The system works by first collecting sentiment and emotion data from the decision-makers, for example, through natural language processing of their feedback or by using emotion recognition techniques. This data is then used to modify the weights and priorities of the decision criteria, reflecting the emotional state and sentiments of the decision-makers.
The modified decision criteria are then used in a fuzzy group decision-making process, which involves aggregating the individual preferences of the decision-makers and reaching a consensus.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and potentially valuable approach to group decision-making, but there are a few caveats and areas for further research:
- The authors acknowledge that the proposed system requires extensive data collection and analysis, which may be challenging to implement in practice, especially in time-sensitive decision-making scenarios.
- The paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the system's performance compared to traditional decision-making approaches, so it's difficult to assess the real-world impact and benefits of the proposed method.
- The authors mention the need for further research on the specific algorithms and techniques used to incorporate sentiment and emotion data into the decision-making process, as well as the potential biases and limitations of this approach.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially impactful idea, but more research and empirical validation is needed to fully assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed system.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a sentiment and emotion-aware multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making system that aims to enhance the decision-making process by incorporating the emotional and sentiment-related factors that can influence people's choices.
The key innovation of the system is its ability to collect and use sentiment and emotion data to modify the decision criteria, reflecting the real-world factors that can impact the decisions made by a group of decision-makers.
While the paper presents a promising approach, it also acknowledges the challenges and limitations of the proposed system, highlighting the need for further research and empirical evaluation. Overall, the paper contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop more holistic and effective decision-making frameworks that better reflect the complexities of human behavior and decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Sentiment and Emotion-aware Multi-criteria Fuzzy Group Decision Making System
Adilet Yerkin, Pakizar Shamoi, Elnara Kadyrgali
In today's world, making decisions as a group is common, whether choosing a restaurant or deciding on a holiday destination. Group decision-making (GDM) systems play a crucial role by facilitating consensus among participants with diverse preferences. Discussions are one of the main tools people use to make decisions. When people discuss alternatives, they use natural language to express their opinions. Traditional GDM systems generally require participants to provide explicit opinion values to the system. However, in real-life scenarios, participants often express their opinions through some text (e.g., in comments, social media, messengers, etc.). This paper introduces a sentiment and emotion-aware multi-criteria fuzzy GDM system designed to enhance consensus-reaching effectiveness in group settings. This system incorporates natural language processing to analyze sentiments and emotions expressed in textual data, enabling an understanding of participant opinions besides the explicit numerical preference inputs. Once all the experts have provided their preferences for the alternatives, the individual preferences are aggregated into a single collective preference matrix. This matrix represents the collective expert opinion regarding the other options. Then, sentiments, emotions, and preference scores are inputted into a fuzzy inference system to get the overall score. The proposed system was used for a small decision-making process - choosing the hotel for a vacation by a group of friends. Our findings demonstrate that integrating sentiment and emotion analysis into GDM systems allows everyone's feelings and opinions to be considered during discussions and significantly improves consensus among participants.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Multi-channel Emotion Analysis for Consensus Reaching in Group Movie Recommendation Systems
Adilet Yerkin, Elnara Kadyrgali, Yerdauit Torekhan, Pakizar Shamoi
Watching movies is one of the social activities typically done in groups. Emotion is the most vital factor that affects movie viewers' preferences. So, the emotional aspect of the movie needs to be determined and analyzed for further recommendations. It can be challenging to choose a movie that appeals to the emotions of a diverse group. Reaching an agreement for a group can be difficult due to the various genres and choices. This paper proposes a novel approach to group movie suggestions by examining emotions from three different channels: movie descriptions (text), soundtracks (audio), and posters (image). We employ the Jaccard similarity index to match each participant's emotional preferences to prospective movie choices, followed by a fuzzy inference technique to determine group consensus. We use a weighted integration process for the fusion of emotion scores from diverse data types. Then, group movie recommendation is based on prevailing emotions and viewers' best-loved movies. After determining the recommendations, the group's consensus level is calculated using a fuzzy inference system, taking participants' feedback as input. Participants (n=130) in the survey were provided with different emotion categories and asked to select the emotions best suited for particular movies (n=12). Comparison results between predicted and actual scores demonstrate the efficiency of using emotion detection for this problem (Jaccard similarity index = 0.76). We explored the relationship between induced emotions and movie popularity as an additional experiment, analyzing emotion distribution in 100 popular movies from the TMDB database. Such systems can potentially improve the accuracy of movie recommendation systems and achieve a high level of consensus among participants with diverse preferences.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Sequential three-way group decision-making for double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set
Nanfang Luo, Qinghua Zhang, Qin Xie, Yutai Wang, Longjun Yin, Guoyin Wang
Group decision-making (GDM) characterized by complexity and uncertainty is an essential part of various life scenarios. Most existing researches lack tools to fuse information quickly and interpret decision results for partially formed decisions. This limitation is particularly noticeable when there is a need to improve the efficiency of GDM. To address this issue, a novel multi-level sequential three-way decision for group decision-making (S3W-GDM) method is constructed from the perspective of granular computing. This method simultaneously considers the vagueness, hesitation, and variation of GDM problems under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (DHHFLTS) environment. First, for fusing information efficiently, a novel multi-level expert information fusion method is proposed, and the concepts of expert decision table and the extraction/aggregation of decision-leveled information based on the multi-level granularity are defined. Second, the neighborhood theory, outranking relation and regret theory (RT) are utilized to redesign the calculations of conditional probability and relative loss function. Then, the granular structure of DHHFLTS based on the sequential three-way decision (S3WD) is defined to improve the decision-making efficiency, and the decision-making strategy and interpretation of each decision-level are proposed. Furthermore, the algorithm of S3W-GDM is given. Finally, an illustrative example of diagnosis is presented, and the comparative and sensitivity analysis with other methods are performed to verify the efficiency and rationality of the proposed method.
Read more6/28/2024
0
Dynamic Sentiment Analysis with Local Large Language Models using Majority Voting: A Study on Factors Affecting Restaurant Evaluation
Junichiro Niimi
User-generated contents (UGCs) on online platforms allow marketing researchers to understand consumer preferences for products and services. With the advance of large language models (LLMs), some studies utilized the models for annotation and sentiment analysis. However, the relationship between the accuracy and the hyper-parameters of LLMs is yet to be thoroughly examined. In addition, the issues of variability and reproducibility of results from each trial of LLMs have rarely been considered in existing literature. Since actual human annotation uses majority voting to resolve disagreements among annotators, this study introduces a majority voting mechanism to a sentiment analysis model using local LLMs. By a series of three analyses of online reviews on restaurant evaluations, we demonstrate that majority voting with multiple attempts using a medium-sized model produces more robust results than using a large model with a single attempt. Furthermore, we conducted further analysis to investigate the effect of each aspect on the overall evaluation.
Read more7/19/2024