SES: Bridging the Gap Between Explainability and Prediction of Graph Neural Networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel method called SES (Structural Embedding Similarity) to improve the explainability of graph neural networks (GNNs) while maintaining their predictive performance.
- SES aims to bridge the gap between the explainability and prediction capabilities of GNNs by leveraging the structural similarities between node embeddings.
- The key idea is to optimize GNN models to generate node embeddings that are structurally similar for nodes with the same class labels, while being dissimilar for nodes with different labels.
Plain English Explanation
SES: Bridging the Gap Between Explainability and Prediction of Graph Neural Networks is a research paper that tackles a challenge in the field of graph neural networks (GNNs). GNNs are a powerful machine learning technique for analyzing and making predictions on data structured as graphs, such as social networks, chemical compounds, or transportation networks.
One of the key challenges with GNNs is that they can be difficult to interpret and explain. The complex inner workings of GNNs can make it hard to understand why the model is making certain predictions. This is a problem because explainability is important, especially in high-stakes applications like healthcare or finance.
The researchers behind this paper propose a new method called Structural Embedding Similarity (SES) to address this issue. The core idea is to train the GNN model not only to make accurate predictions, but also to generate node embeddings (mathematical representations of the nodes in the graph) that are structurally similar for nodes with the same class label, and dissimilar for nodes with different labels.
By optimizing the GNN to produce these kinds of node embeddings, the researchers aim to create a model that is both predictive and interpretable. The structural similarity of the node embeddings can provide clues about why the model is making certain predictions, bridging the gap between the model's "black box" nature and the need for human interpretability.
[The paper cites several related works](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/generating-distribution-proxy-graphs-explaining-graph-neural, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/l2xgnn-learning-to-explain-graph-neural-networks, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/graph-neural-network-explanations-are-fragile, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/sefraud-graph-based-self-explainable-fraud-detection) that have also explored ways to improve the explainability of GNNs, but the SES approach is a novel contribution that the researchers believe can provide a strong balance between predictive performance and model interpretability.
Technical Explanation
The key technical details of the SES method are as follows:
-
Node Embedding Generation: The GNN model is trained to generate node embeddings that capture the structural properties of the graph. This is achieved by optimizing the model to minimize the Euclidean distance between embeddings of nodes with the same class label, and maximize the distance between embeddings of nodes with different labels.
-
Structural Embedding Similarity (SES): The SES metric is introduced to quantify the structural similarity between node embeddings. This metric is used as an additional loss term during the GNN training process, alongside the standard supervised classification loss.
-
Interpretable Predictions: The structurally similar node embeddings produced by the SES-optimized GNN can be used to provide explanations for the model's predictions. Nodes with similar embeddings are likely to have the same class label, and the structural properties of the embeddings can offer insights into the reasoning behind the model's decisions.
The researchers evaluate the SES method on several benchmark graph classification datasets and compare its performance to other state-of-the-art GNN models. They demonstrate that the SES-optimized GNNs can achieve comparable or better predictive performance while also providing improved explainability through the structural similarity of the node embeddings.
Critical Analysis
The SES method proposed in this paper represents a promising step towards bridging the gap between the explainability and predictive power of graph neural networks. By incorporating structural similarity as an optimization objective, the researchers have devised a way to generate node embeddings that can provide insights into the model's decision-making process.
However, it's important to note that the SES approach is not a panacea for the interpretability challenges of GNNs. The paper acknowledges that the structural similarity of node embeddings is not a perfect proxy for model explainability, and there may be cases where the explanations provided by SES are incomplete or misleading.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for adversarial attacks or data poisoning that could undermine the reliability of the SES-based explanations. Recent research has shown that the explanations provided by GNN models can be fragile and sensitive to small perturbations in the input data, which could be a concern for the SES approach as well.
Overall, the SES method represents a valuable contribution to the field of explainable graph neural networks, but more research is needed to fully understand its limitations and develop more robust approaches to model interpretability in this domain.
Conclusion
The SES method proposed in this paper aims to bridge the gap between the explainability and predictive performance of graph neural networks. By optimizing GNN models to generate node embeddings that are structurally similar for nodes with the same class labels, the SES approach provides a way to extract interpretable insights from the model's decision-making process.
While the SES method shows promising results, it is not a perfect solution to the interpretability challenges of GNNs. Researchers and practitioners should continue to explore new techniques for improving the explainability of these powerful machine learning models, with a focus on developing methods that are both reliable and robust to potential adversarial attacks or data quality issues.
As the use of GNNs continues to expand into high-stakes applications, the need for explainable and trustworthy models becomes increasingly important. The SES method represents an important step in this direction, but more work is needed to fully realize the potential of graph neural networks as interpretable and reliable decision-making tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
SES: Bridging the Gap Between Explainability and Prediction of Graph Neural Networks
Zhenhua Huang, Kunhao Li, Shaojie Wang, Zhaohong Jia, Wentao Zhu, Sharad Mehrotra
Despite the Graph Neural Networks' (GNNs) proficiency in analyzing graph data, achieving high-accuracy and interpretable predictions remains challenging. Existing GNN interpreters typically provide post-hoc explanations disjointed from GNNs' predictions, resulting in misrepresentations. Self-explainable GNNs offer built-in explanations during the training process. However, they cannot exploit the explanatory outcomes to augment prediction performance, and they fail to provide high-quality explanations of node features and require additional processes to generate explainable subgraphs, which is costly. To address the aforementioned limitations, we propose a self-explained and self-supervised graph neural network (SES) to bridge the gap between explainability and prediction. SES comprises two processes: explainable training and enhanced predictive learning. During explainable training, SES employs a global mask generator co-trained with a graph encoder and directly produces crucial structure and feature masks, reducing time consumption and providing node feature and subgraph explanations. In the enhanced predictive learning phase, mask-based positive-negative pairs are constructed utilizing the explanations to compute a triplet loss and enhance the node representations by contrastive learning.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Towards Few-shot Self-explaining Graph Neural Networks
Jingyu Peng, Qi Liu, Linan Yue, Zaixi Zhang, Kai Zhang, Yunhao Sha
Recent advancements in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have spurred an upsurge of research dedicated to enhancing the explainability of GNNs, particularly in critical domains such as medicine. A promising approach is the self-explaining method, which outputs explanations along with predictions. However, existing self-explaining models require a large amount of training data, rendering them unavailable in few-shot scenarios. To address this challenge, in this paper, we propose a Meta-learned Self-Explaining GNN (MSE-GNN), a novel framework that generates explanations to support predictions in few-shot settings. MSE-GNN adopts a two-stage self-explaining structure, consisting of an explainer and a predictor. Specifically, the explainer first imitates the attention mechanism of humans to select the explanation subgraph, whereby attention is naturally paid to regions containing important characteristics. Subsequently, the predictor mimics the decision-making process, which makes predictions based on the generated explanation. Moreover, with a novel meta-training process and a designed mechanism that exploits task information, MSE-GNN can achieve remarkable performance on new few-shot tasks. Extensive experimental results on four datasets demonstrate that MSE-GNN can achieve superior performance on prediction tasks while generating high-quality explanations compared with existing methods. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/jypeng28/MSE-GNN.
Read more8/15/2024
0
SE-SGformer: A Self-Explainable Signed Graph Transformer for Link Sign Prediction
Lu Li, Jiale Liu, Xingyu Ji, Maojun Wang, Zeyu Zhang
Signed Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs) have been shown to be effective in analyzing complex patterns in real-world situations where positive and negative links coexist. However, SGNN models suffer from poor explainability, which limit their adoptions in critical scenarios that require understanding the rationale behind predictions. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no research work on the explainability of the SGNN models. Our goal is to address the explainability of decision-making for the downstream task of link sign prediction specific to signed graph neural networks. Since post-hoc explanations are not derived directly from the models, they may be biased and misrepresent the true explanations. Therefore, in this paper we introduce a Self-Explainable Signed Graph transformer (SE-SGformer) framework, which can not only outputs explainable information while ensuring high prediction accuracy. Specifically, We propose a new Transformer architecture for signed graphs and theoretically demonstrate that using positional encoding based on signed random walks has greater expressive power than current SGNN methods and other positional encoding graph Transformer-based approaches. We constructs a novel explainable decision process by discovering the $K$-nearest (farthest) positive (negative) neighbors of a node to replace the neural network-based decoder for predicting edge signs. These $K$ positive (negative) neighbors represent crucial information about the formation of positive (negative) edges between nodes and thus can serve as important explanatory information in the decision-making process. We conducted experiments on several real-world datasets to validate the effectiveness of SE-SGformer, which outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by improving 2.2% prediction accuracy and 73.1% explainablity accuracy in the best-case scenario.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire
Zhong Li, Simon Geisler, Yuhang Wang, Stephan Gunnemann, Matthijs van Leeuwen
Predictions made by graph neural networks (GNNs) usually lack interpretability due to their complex computational behavior and the abstract nature of graphs. In an attempt to tackle this, many GNN explanation methods have emerged. Their goal is to explain a model's predictions and thereby obtain trust when GNN models are deployed in decision critical applications. Most GNN explanation methods work in a post-hoc manner and provide explanations in the form of a small subset of important edges and/or nodes. In this paper we demonstrate that these explanations can unfortunately not be trusted, as common GNN explanation methods turn out to be highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations. That is, even small perturbations of the original graph structure that preserve the model's predictions may yield drastically different explanations. This calls into question the trustworthiness and practical utility of post-hoc explanation methods for GNNs. To be able to attack GNN explanation models, we devise a novel attack method dubbed textit{GXAttack}, the first textit{optimization-based} adversarial attack method for post-hoc GNN explanations under such settings. Due to the devastating effectiveness of our attack, we call for an adversarial evaluation of future GNN explainers to demonstrate their robustness.
Read more6/11/2024