SGHateCheck: Functional Tests for Detecting Hate Speech in Low-Resource Languages of Singapore

Overview

• Introduces a new framework called SGHateCheck for detecting hate speech in the linguistic and cultural context of Singapore and Southeast Asia
• Extends the functional testing approach of previous frameworks like HateCheck and MHC
• Employs large language models for translation and paraphrasing into Singapore's main languages, then refines these with native annotators
• Reveals critical flaws in state-of-the-art hate speech detection models, highlighting their inadequacy for sensitive content moderation in diverse linguistic environments

Plain English Explanation

The researchers developed a new framework called SGHateCheck to detect hate speech, specifically tailored for the languages and cultures of Singapore and Southeast Asia. It builds on previous approaches like HateCheck and MHC, using large language models to translate and rephrase content into Singapore's main languages, then having native speakers review and refine the results.

This is important because current hate speech detection models often struggle to accurately identify problematic content in diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. The researchers found that these state-of-the-art models have critical flaws when it comes to moderating sensitive content, especially in places like Singapore and Southeast Asia.

By developing a framework that accounts for the unique linguistic and cultural nuances of the region, the researchers aim to foster the creation of more effective hate speech detection tools. This could help improve content moderation and make online spaces safer and more inclusive for users in Singapore, Southeast Asia, and potentially other diverse linguistic environments.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduced a novel framework called SGHateCheck to address the limitations of current hate speech detection models, particularly in the linguistic and cultural context of Singapore and Southeast Asia. SGHateCheck extends the functional testing approach used in previous frameworks like HateCheck and MHC.

The key aspects of SGHateCheck include:

• Employing large language models to translate and paraphrase content into Singapore's main languages (e.g., Malay, Mandarin, Tamil)
• Refining the translated and paraphrased content with the help of native annotators familiar with the local linguistic and cultural nuances
• Evaluating the performance of state-of-the-art hate speech detection models on the refined dataset to reveal critical flaws in their ability to accurately identify problematic content in diverse linguistic environments

By taking this approach, the researchers were able to uncover significant shortcomings in the capabilities of current hate speech detection systems when applied to the unique context of Singapore and Southeast Asia. This underscores the need for more effective tools that can accurately moderate sensitive content in diverse linguistic and cultural settings.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that while SGHateCheck represents an important step forward in addressing the limitations of existing hate speech detection models, there are still areas for further research and improvement.

One potential limitation is the reliance on native annotators to refine the translated and paraphrased content. While this approach helps capture local linguistic and cultural nuances, it may be challenging to scale and maintain consistency across large datasets.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific challenges or biases that may arise when using large language models for translation and paraphrasing in the context of hate speech detection. Further exploration of these issues could provide valuable insights for developing more robust and inclusive systems.

It would also be beneficial to extend the evaluation of SGHateCheck to other Southeast Asian countries and languages beyond Singapore, as the linguistic and cultural diversity in the region is quite vast. Comparing the performance of the framework across different contexts could uncover additional insights and areas for improvement.

Overall, the SGHateCheck framework represents a significant advancement in the field of hate speech detection, particularly for the Singapore and Southeast Asia region. By highlighting the critical flaws in current state-of-the-art models, the researchers have laid the groundwork for the development of more effective and culturally-sensitive tools. Continued research and refinement in this area could have important implications for fostering safer and more inclusive online environments.

Conclusion

The researchers introduced SGHateCheck, a novel framework designed to address the limitations of current hate speech detection models in the linguistic and cultural context of Singapore and Southeast Asia. By employing large language models for translation and paraphrasing, and refining the results with native annotators, SGHateCheck revealed significant shortcomings in the capabilities of state-of-the-art hate speech detection systems when applied to diverse linguistic environments.

This work aims to foster the development of more effective and culturally-sensitive hate speech detection tools, which could have important implications for improving content moderation and creating safer, more inclusive online spaces in Singapore, Southeast Asia, and potentially other regions with diverse linguistic and cultural landscapes. The critical insights gained from this research underscore the need for continued innovation and a deeper understanding of the unique challenges posed by hate speech detection in multilingual and multicultural contexts.