SGM-PINN: Sampling Graphical Models for Faster Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2407.07358 - Published 7/11/2024 by John Anticev, Ali Aghdaei, Wuxinlin Cheng, Zhuo Feng
Total Score

0

SGM-PINN: Sampling Graphical Models for Faster Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a new approach called SGM-PINN (Sampling Graphical Models for Physics-Informed Neural Networks) to improve the training of physics-informed neural networks
  • Leverages sampling techniques from graphical models to enhance the training process
  • Aims to achieve faster convergence and better generalization compared to standard PINN approaches

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a technique called SGM-PINN that combines physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) with sampling methods from graphical models. PINNs are a type of machine learning model that incorporates knowledge of the underlying physics into the learning process, helping them make more accurate predictions. However, training PINNs can be computationally expensive and challenging.

The key idea behind SGM-PINN is to use sampling techniques, which are commonly used in graphical models, to improve the training of PINNs. Graphical models are a way of representing and reasoning about complex systems using probability distributions. By applying these sampling methods to PINNs, the authors aim to achieve faster convergence during training and better generalization to new data.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of SGM-PINN through experiments on various physics-based problems, showing that it can outperform standard PINN approaches in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. This innovation could lead to more practical and effective applications of physics-informed machine learning in fields like fluid dynamics, solid mechanics, and climate modeling.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new approach called SGM-PINN (Sampling Graphical Models for Physics-Informed Neural Networks) to improve the training of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). PINNs are a class of machine learning models that incorporate knowledge of the underlying physics into the learning process, which can lead to more accurate predictions compared to traditional data-driven approaches.

However, training PINNs can be computationally expensive and challenging, especially for complex physical systems. To address this, the authors propose to leverage sampling techniques from the field of graphical models, which are commonly used to efficiently represent and reason about complex probabilistic systems.

Specifically, the SGM-PINN framework combines PINN architectures with advanced sampling algorithms, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. These sampling techniques are used to explore the high-dimensional parameter space of the PINN, allowing for more efficient exploration of the solution space and faster convergence during training.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SGM-PINN through experiments on various physics-based problems, including internal links for SEO:, internal links for SEO:, internal links for SEO:, internal links for SEO:, and internal links for SEO:. The results show that SGM-PINN can outperform standard PINN approaches in terms of accuracy, convergence speed, and generalization to new data.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the training of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) by incorporating sampling techniques from graphical models. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their SGM-PINN framework through comprehensive experiments, showing its advantages over standard PINN approaches.

One potential limitation of the proposed method is the computational overhead associated with the sampling algorithms, which may still be significant for large-scale or complex physical systems. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest that further research is needed to optimize the sampling process and improve the scalability of the method.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the convergence properties or the quality of the solutions obtained by SGM-PINN compared to other PINN variants, such as internal links for SEO:, internal links for SEO:, internal links for SEO:, internal links for SEO:, and internal links for SEO:. A more in-depth theoretical analysis could help provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and potentially guide further improvements to the method.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel approach called SGM-PINN that combines physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) with sampling techniques from graphical models to improve the training process. The key idea is to leverage advanced sampling algorithms, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, to explore the high-dimensional parameter space of PINNs more efficiently, leading to faster convergence and better generalization.

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of SGM-PINN in outperforming standard PINN approaches across a range of physics-based problems. This innovation could have significant implications for the broader field of physics-informed machine learning, potentially enabling more practical and accurate applications in areas like fluid dynamics, solid mechanics, and climate modeling.

While the paper highlights the potential of SGM-PINN, further research is needed to address the computational overhead associated with the sampling algorithms and provide a more comprehensive theoretical analysis of the method's properties. Nonetheless, the proposed approach represents an important step forward in enhancing the training and performance of physics-informed neural networks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

SGM-PINN: Sampling Graphical Models for Faster Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Total Score

0

SGM-PINN: Sampling Graphical Models for Faster Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

John Anticev, Ali Aghdaei, Wuxinlin Cheng, Zhuo Feng

SGM-PINN is a graph-based importance sampling framework to improve the training efficacy of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) on parameterized problems. By applying a graph decomposition scheme to an undirected Probabilistic Graphical Model (PGM) built from the training dataset, our method generates node clusters encoding conditional dependence between training samples. Biasing sampling towards more important clusters allows smaller mini-batches and training datasets, improving training speed and accuracy. We additionally fuse an efficient robustness metric with residual losses to determine regions requiring additional sampling. Experiments demonstrate the advantages of the proposed framework, achieving $3times$ faster convergence compared to prior state-of-the-art sampling methods.

Read more

7/11/2024

The Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model: Generation III
Total Score

0

The Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model: Generation III

John Martin, Hanspeter Schaub

Scientific machine learning and the advent of the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) have shown high potential in their ability to solve complex differential equations. One example is the use of PINNs to solve the gravity field modeling problem -- learning convenient representations of the gravitational potential from position and acceleration data. These PINN gravity models, or PINN-GMs, have demonstrated advantages in model compactness, robustness to noise, and sample efficiency when compared to popular alternatives; however, further investigation has revealed various failure modes for these and other machine learning gravity models which this manuscript aims to address. Specifically, this paper introduces the third generation Physics-Informed Neural Network Gravity Model (PINN-GM-III) which includes design changes that solve the problems of feature divergence, bias towards low-altitude samples, numerical instability, and extrapolation error. Six evaluation metrics are proposed to expose these past pitfalls and illustrate the PINN-GM-III's robustness to them. This study concludes by evaluating the PINN-GM-III modeling accuracy on a heterogeneous density asteroid, and comparing its performance to other analytic and machine learning gravity models.

Read more

8/14/2024

Improved physics-informed neural network in mitigating gradient related failures
Total Score

0

Improved physics-informed neural network in mitigating gradient related failures

Pancheng Niu, Yongming Chen, Jun Guo, Yuqian Zhou, Minfu Feng, Yanchao Shi

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) integrate fundamental physical principles with advanced data-driven techniques, driving significant advancements in scientific computing. However, PINNs face persistent challenges with stiffness in gradient flow, which limits their predictive capabilities. This paper presents an improved PINN (I-PINN) to mitigate gradient-related failures. The core of I-PINN is to combine the respective strengths of neural networks with an improved architecture and adaptive weights containingupper bounds. The capability to enhance accuracy by at least one order of magnitude and accelerate convergence, without introducing extra computational complexity relative to the baseline model, is achieved by I-PINN. Numerical experiments with a variety of benchmarks illustrate the improved accuracy and generalization of I-PINN. The supporting data and code are accessible at https://github.com/PanChengN/I-PINN.git, enabling broader research engagement.

Read more

7/30/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Physics-informed Neural Networks with Unknown Measurement Noise

Philipp Pilar, Niklas Wahlstrom

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) constitute a flexible approach to both finding solutions and identifying parameters of partial differential equations. Most works on the topic assume noiseless data, or data contaminated with weak Gaussian noise. We show that the standard PINN framework breaks down in case of non-Gaussian noise. We give a way of resolving this fundamental issue and we propose to jointly train an energy-based model (EBM) to learn the correct noise distribution. We illustrate the improved performance of our approach using multiple examples.

Read more

6/21/2024