Shape Arithmetic Expressions: Advancing Scientific Discovery Beyond Closed-Form Equations
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This blog post provides a plain English summary of a research paper on formatting instructions for academic papers.
- The paper covers guidelines for formatting the structure, layout, and appearance of academic papers.
- It also includes sections on missing proofs and additional experiments related to the research.
Plain English Explanation
The provided research paper outlines formatting instructions for academic papers. These instructions cover how to structure, layout, and present the content of an academic paper.
The paper includes sections on:
- Formatting Instructions: Detailing guidelines for the overall structure, layout, and appearance of the paper.
- Missing Proofs: Providing supplementary information and explanations for certain lemmas or theorems mentioned in the main text.
- Additional Experiments: Describing further investigations and analyses conducted as part of the research project.
The formatting instructions likely aim to help authors ensure their papers adhere to consistent standards and best practices within their field. This can make the papers easier to read, understand, and evaluate by reviewers and readers.
The missing proofs and additional experiments sections provide extra context and transparency around the research methods and findings, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the work.
Technical Explanation
The formatting instructions outlined in the paper cover various aspects of academic paper presentation, including:
- Structure and organization of the paper
- Typesetting and layout guidelines
- Formatting of bibliographic references and citations
The missing proofs section focuses on providing supplementary details for Lemma 3, likely a key theoretical result presented in the main paper. This additional information helps readers fully understand the mathematical foundations of the research.
The additional experiments section describes further investigations conducted by the researchers, potentially exploring the robustness, generalizability, or practical implications of their findings.
Critical Analysis
The formatting instructions provided are likely standard practice within the academic field where this paper was published. While these guidelines may seem overly prescriptive to some readers, they serve an important purpose in maintaining consistency and clarity across scholarly works.
The inclusion of missing proofs and additional experiments suggests the researchers aimed to be thorough and transparent in their reporting. By providing this supplementary information, they allow readers to better scrutinize the technical details and evaluate the quality of the research.
However, the blog post does not delve deeply into the specific contents or findings of the research. To fully assess the significance and potential limitations of the work, readers would need to refer to the original paper or other related publications in this area of mathematical reasoning and symbolic regression.
Conclusion
This research paper outlines a set of formatting instructions for academic papers, likely aimed at maintaining consistency and clarity in scholarly publications. The additional sections on missing proofs and further experiments suggest a commitment to thoroughness and transparency in the research process.
While the specific contents of the paper are not explored in depth, the formatting guidelines and supplementary information provided can be valuable resources for authors seeking to present their work in a professional and accessible manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Shape Arithmetic Expressions: Advancing Scientific Discovery Beyond Closed-Form Equations
Krzysztof Kacprzyk, Mihaela van der Schaar
Symbolic regression has excelled in uncovering equations from physics, chemistry, biology, and related disciplines. However, its effectiveness becomes less certain when applied to experimental data lacking inherent closed-form expressions. Empirically derived relationships, such as entire stress-strain curves, may defy concise closed-form representation, compelling us to explore more adaptive modeling approaches that balance flexibility with interpretability. In our pursuit, we turn to Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), a widely used class of models known for their versatility across various domains. Although GAMs can capture non-linear relationships between variables and targets, they cannot capture intricate feature interactions. In this work, we investigate both of these challenges and propose a novel class of models, Shape Arithmetic Expressions (SHAREs), that fuses GAM's flexible shape functions with the complex feature interactions found in mathematical expressions. SHAREs also provide a unifying framework for both of these approaches. We also design a set of rules for constructing SHAREs that guarantee transparency of the found expressions beyond the standard constraints based on the model's size.
Read more4/16/2024
↗️
0
Shape Constraints in Symbolic Regression using Penalized Least Squares
Viktor Martinek, Julia Reuter, Ophelia Frotscher, Sanaz Mostaghim, Markus Richter, Roland Herzog
We study the addition of shape constraints (SC) and their consideration during the parameter identification step of symbolic regression (SR). SC serve as a means to introduce prior knowledge about the shape of the otherwise unknown model function into SR. Unlike previous works that have explored SC in SR, we propose minimizing SC violations during parameter identification using gradient-based numerical optimization. We test three algorithm variants to evaluate their performance in identifying three symbolic expressions from synthetically generated data sets. This paper examines two benchmark scenarios: one with varying noise levels and another with reduced amounts of training data. The results indicate that incorporating SC into the expression search is particularly beneficial when data is scarce. Compared to using SC only in the selection process, our approach of minimizing violations during parameter identification shows a statistically significant benefit in some of our test cases, without being significantly worse in any instance.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Symbolic Regression for Beyond the Standard Model Physics
Shehu AbdusSalam, Steve Abel, Miguel Crispim Romao
We propose symbolic regression as a powerful tool for studying Beyond the Standard Model physics. As a benchmark model, we consider the so-called Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, which has a four-dimensional parameter space defined at the GUT scale. We provide a set of analytical expressions that reproduce three low-energy observables of interest in terms of the parameters of the theory: the Higgs mass, the contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, and the cold dark matter relic density. To demonstrate the power of the approach, we employ the symbolic expressions in a global fits analysis to derive the posterior probability densities of the parameters, which are obtained extremely rapidly in comparison with conventional methods.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Physics-Informed Geometric Operators to Support Surrogate, Dimension Reduction and Generative Models for Engineering Design
Shahroz Khan (Wayne), Zahid Masood (Wayne), Muhammad Usama (Wayne), Konstantinos Kostas (Wayne), Panagiotis Kaklis (Wayne), Wei (Wayne), Chen
In this work, we propose a set of physics-informed geometric operators (GOs) to enrich the geometric data provided for training surrogate/discriminative models, dimension reduction, and generative models, typically employed for performance prediction, dimension reduction, and creating data-driven parameterisations, respectively. However, as both the input and output streams of these models consist of low-level shape representations, they often fail to capture shape characteristics essential for performance analyses. Therefore, the proposed GOs exploit the differential and integral properties of shapes--accessed through Fourier descriptors, curvature integrals, geometric moments, and their invariants--to infuse high-level intrinsic geometric information and physics into the feature vector used for training, even when employing simple model architectures or low-level parametric descriptions. We showed that for surrogate modelling, along with the inclusion of the notion of physics, GOs enact regularisation to reduce over-fitting and enhance generalisation to new, unseen designs. Furthermore, through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate that for dimension reduction and generative models, incorporating the proposed GOs enriches the training data with compact global and local geometric features. This significantly enhances the quality of the resulting latent space, thereby facilitating the generation of valid and diverse designs. Lastly, we also show that GOs can enable learning parametric sensitivities to a great extent. Consequently, these enhancements accelerate the convergence rate of shape optimisers towards optimal solutions.
Read more7/11/2024