Shape It Up: An Empirically Grounded Approach for Designing Shape Palettes
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a systematic approach for designing shape palettes, which are collections of shapes used in data visualizations and other applications.
- The approach is grounded in empirical studies that explore how people perceive and categorize different shapes.
- The researchers use this knowledge to develop guidelines and tools for creating effective shape palettes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of designing shape palettes, which are collections of shapes used in things like data visualizations. The researchers conducted studies to understand how people perceive and group different shapes. They then used these insights to develop a systematic approach for creating shape palettes that are effective and easy for people to use.
The key idea is that by understanding the underlying perceptual principles that guide how people see and categorize shapes, designers can create shape palettes that are more intuitive and meaningful. This is important because shapes are a fundamental building block of many visual representations, and the choice of shapes can greatly impact how information is communicated and interpreted.
For example, a link to a related paper on categorical color perception in scatterplots might show how the selection of shape can influence how viewers perceive and make sense of data visualizations. The "Shape It Up" paper provides a research-backed framework to help designers make more informed and effective choices when it comes to shape selection.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an empirically grounded approach for designing shape palettes. The researchers conducted a series of studies to investigate how people perceive and categorize different shapes. They found that shape perception is influenced by a range of factors, including the shape's complexity, symmetry, and "goodness of form."
Based on these findings, the researchers developed a set of guidelines and tools to support the creation of effective shape palettes. This includes a quantitative model for predicting perceptual similarity between shapes, as well as a computational method for generating shape palettes that maximize perceptual distance between the constituent shapes.
The paper also describes a software tool called "ShapePalette" that implements these techniques. The tool allows designers to explore different shape palette options and interactively refine them based on feedback from the perceptual model.
Overall, the paper makes important contributions to the field of data visualization and information design by providing a research-backed framework for selecting shapes that are intuitive and easy for people to understand. This builds on prior work in dimensionality reduction for shape analysis and ensemble perception of scalar fields.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and thorough empirical investigation into shape perception and categorization. The researchers used a diverse set of experimental methods, including pairwise comparisons, free sorting tasks, and quantitative modeling, to gain a nuanced understanding of the key factors that influence shape perception.
One potential limitation is that the studies were conducted primarily with Western, educated participants. It would be valuable to see if the findings generalize to more diverse populations and cultural contexts. Additionally, the paper focuses on static 2D shapes, but many real-world applications involve dynamic or 3D shapes. Extending the research to these domains could yield additional insights.
That said, the researchers acknowledge these limitations and suggest avenues for future work, such as investigating the role of context and task demands in shape perception. They also provide concrete tools and guidelines that designers can use today to create more effective shape palettes, which is a significant practical contribution.
Overall, the paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of how people perceive and reason about shapes, with implications for a wide range of applications in data visualization, user interface design, and beyond.
Conclusion
The "Shape It Up" paper presents a systematic, empirically grounded approach for designing shape palettes. By conducting rigorous studies on shape perception and categorization, the researchers have developed a set of guidelines and computational tools to help designers create shape palettes that are intuitive and effective for end users.
This work builds on and complements prior research in areas like dimensionality reduction for shape analysis and interaction-aware explanations, ultimately contributing to a broader understanding of how people perceive and reason about visual information.
The potential impact of this research is far-reaching, as shape is a fundamental building block of many visual representations, from data visualizations to user interfaces. By providing a more principled approach to shape palette design, the "Shape It Up" framework can help improve the clarity, intuitiveness, and effectiveness of a wide range of visual communication tools and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Shape It Up: An Empirically Grounded Approach for Designing Shape Palettes
Chin Tseng, Arran Zeyu Wang, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Danielle Albers Szafir
Shape is commonly used to distinguish between categories in multi-class scatterplots. However, existing guidelines for choosing effective shape palettes rely largely on intuition and do not consider how these needs may change as the number of categories increases. Although shapes can be a finite number compared to colors, they can not be represented by a numerical space, making it difficult to propose a general guideline for shape choices or shed light on the design heuristics of designer-crafted shape palettes. This paper presents a series of four experiments evaluating the efficiency of 39 shapes across three tasks -- relative mean judgment tasks, expert choices, and data correlation estimation. Given how complex and tangled results are, rather than relying on conventional features for modeling, we built a model and introduced a corresponding design tool that offers recommendations for shape encodings. The perceptual effectiveness of shapes significantly varies across specific pairs, and certain shapes may enhance perceptual efficiency and accuracy. However, how performance varies does not map well to classical features of shape such as angles, fill, or convex hull. We developed a model based on pairwise relations between shapes measured in our experiments and the number of shapes required to intelligently recommend shape palettes for a given design. This tool provides designers with agency over shape selection while incorporating empirical elements of perceptual performance captured in our study. Our model advances the understanding of shape perception in visualization contexts and provides practical design guidelines for advanced shape usage in visualization design that optimize perceptual efficiency.
Read more8/30/2024
👁️
0
Revisiting Categorical Color Perception in Scatterplots: Sequential, Diverging, and Categorical Palettes
Chin Tseng, Arran Zeyu Wang, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Danielle Albers Szafir
Existing guidelines for categorical color selection are heuristic, often grounded in intuition rather than empirical studies of readers' abilities. While design conventions recommend palettes maximize hue differences, more recent exploratory findings indicate other factors, such as lightness, may play a role in effective categorical palette design. We conducted a crowdsourced experiment on mean value judgments in multi-class scatterplots using five color palette families--single-hue sequential, multi-hue sequential, perceptually-uniform multi-hue sequential, diverging, and multi-hue categorical--that differ in how they manipulate hue and lightness. Participants estimated relative mean positions in scatterplots containing 2 to 10 categories using 20 colormaps. Our results confirm heuristic guidance that hue-based categorical palettes are most effective. However, they also provide additional evidence that scalable categorical encoding relies on more than hue variance.
Read more4/8/2024
📉
0
A Survey on Design-space Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Shape Optimization
Andrea Serani, Matteo Diez
The rapidly evolving field of engineering design of functional surfaces necessitates sophisticated tools to manage the inherent complexity of high-dimensional design spaces. This review delves into the field of design-space dimensionality reduction techniques tailored for shape optimization, bridging traditional methods and cutting-edge technologies. Dissecting the spectrum of these techniques, from classical linear approaches like principal component analysis to more nuanced nonlinear methods such as autoencoders, the discussion extends to innovative physics-informed methods that integrate physical data into the dimensionality reduction process, enhancing the predictive accuracy and relevance of reduced models. By integrating these methods into optimization frameworks, it is shown how they significantly mitigate the curse of dimensionality, streamline computational processes, and refine the exploration and optimization of complex functional surfaces. The survey provides a classification of method and highlights the transformative impact of these techniques in simplifying design challenges, thereby fostering more efficient and effective engineering solutions.
Read more5/24/2024
🤔
0
Succinct Interaction-Aware Explanations
Sascha Xu, Joscha Cuppers, Jilles Vreeken
SHAP is a popular approach to explain black-box models by revealing the importance of individual features. As it ignores feature interactions, SHAP explanations can be confusing up to misleading. NSHAP, on the other hand, reports the additive importance for all subsets of features. While this does include all interacting sets of features, it also leads to an exponentially sized, difficult to interpret explanation. In this paper, we propose to combine the best of these two worlds, by partitioning the features into parts that significantly interact, and use these parts to compose a succinct, interpretable, additive explanation. We derive a criterion by which to measure the representativeness of such a partition for a models behavior, traded off against the complexity of the resulting explanation. To efficiently find the best partition out of super-exponentially many, we show how to prune sub-optimal solutions using a statistical test, which not only improves runtime but also helps to detect spurious interactions. Experiments on synthetic and real world data show that our explanations are both more accurate resp. more easily interpretable than those of SHAP and NSHAP.
Read more4/22/2024