Shapley Marginal Surplus for Strong Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the problem of subset functions and their theoretical properties
- Introduces the concept of subset functions and their applications
- Explores the theoretical foundations and key insights related to subset functions
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper delves into the study of subset functions, which are a class of mathematical functions with interesting theoretical properties. Subset functions have applications in various fields, such as explainable AI, feature attribution, and data valuation.
The paper begins by introducing the theoretical preliminaries necessary to understand the properties of subset functions. It then explores the key characteristics of these functions, such as their relationship to set operations and their potential for applications in various domains.
The researchers delve into the mathematical intricacies of subset functions, investigating their theoretical properties and potential use cases. The paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of this class of functions and pave the way for further research and practical applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by introducing the problem of subset functions and their theoretical properties. It then presents the necessary theoretical preliminaries for understanding the properties of these functions, including concepts from set theory and mathematical analysis.
The core of the paper focuses on exploring the characteristics of subset functions. The researchers analyze the relationships between subset functions and set operations, and investigate the theoretical properties of these functions, such as their behavior under various transformations and conditions.
The paper also discusses the potential applications of subset functions, highlighting their relevance in areas like explainable AI, feature attribution, and data valuation. The researchers explore how the theoretical properties of subset functions can be leveraged to address challenges in these domains.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous exploration of the theoretical properties of subset functions. However, it does not delve deeply into the practical applications of these functions, focusing more on the mathematical aspects.
While the paper mentions potential use cases, it does not provide extensive details or case studies demonstrating how subset functions can be effectively applied in real-world scenarios. Further research and empirical validation would be beneficial to bridge the gap between the theoretical insights and practical implementation.
Additionally, the paper could have addressed potential limitations or caveats of subset functions, such as the computational complexity involved in working with these functions or the challenges in interpreting their outputs in certain contexts. Discussing these aspects could help readers understand the nuances and tradeoffs associated with the use of subset functions.
Conclusion
The provided paper presents a comprehensive study of subset functions, exploring their theoretical properties and potential applications. It lays the groundwork for understanding the mathematical characteristics of these functions and their relevance in fields like explainable AI, feature attribution, and data valuation.
While the paper focuses primarily on the theoretical aspects, it sets the stage for further research and practical implementation of subset functions. Bridging the gap between the theoretical insights and real-world applications could lead to significant advancements in the various domains where these functions can be leveraged.
Overall, this paper contributes to the understanding of a specific class of mathematical functions and their theoretical underpinnings, opening up avenues for future exploration and the development of novel applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Shapley Marginal Surplus for Strong Models
Daniel de Marchi, Michael Kosorok, Scott de Marchi
Shapley values have seen widespread use in machine learning as a way to explain model predictions and estimate the importance of covariates. Accurately explaining models is critical in real-world models to both aid in decision making and to infer the properties of the true data-generating process (DGP). In this paper, we demonstrate that while model-based Shapley values might be accurate explainers of model predictions, machine learning models themselves are often poor explainers of the DGP even if the model is highly accurate. Particularly in the presence of interrelated or noisy variables, the output of a highly predictive model may fail to account for these relationships. This implies explanations of a trained model's behavior may fail to provide meaningful insight into the DGP. In this paper we introduce a novel variable importance algorithm, Shapley Marginal Surplus for Strong Models, that samples the space of possible models to come up with an inferential measure of feature importance. We compare this method to other popular feature importance methods, both Shapley-based and non-Shapley based, and demonstrate significant outperformance in inferential capabilities relative to other methods.
Read more8/19/2024
🗣️
0
Causal Analysis of Shapley Values: Conditional vs. Marginal
Ilya Rozenfeld
Shapley values, a game theoretic concept, has been one of the most popular tools for explaining Machine Learning (ML) models in recent years. Unfortunately, the two most common approaches, conditional and marginal, to calculating Shapley values can lead to different results along with some undesirable side effects when features are correlated. This in turn has led to the situation in the literature where contradictory recommendations regarding choice of an approach are provided by different authors. In this paper we aim to resolve this controversy through the use of causal arguments. We show that the differences arise from the implicit assumptions that are made within each method to deal with missing causal information. We also demonstrate that the conditional approach is fundamentally unsound from a causal perspective. This, together with previous work in [1], leads to the conclusion that the marginal approach should be preferred over the conditional one.
Read more9/11/2024
✨
0
On marginal feature attributions of tree-based models
Khashayar Filom, Alexey Miroshnikov, Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos, Arjun Ravi Kannan
Due to their power and ease of use, tree-based machine learning models, such as random forests and gradient-boosted tree ensembles, have become very popular. To interpret them, local feature attributions based on marginal expectations, e.g. marginal (interventional) Shapley, Owen or Banzhaf values, may be employed. Such methods are true to the model and implementation invariant, i.e. dependent only on the input-output function of the model. We contrast this with the popular TreeSHAP algorithm by presenting two (statistically similar) decision trees that compute the exact same function for which the path-dependent TreeSHAP yields different rankings of features, whereas the marginal Shapley values coincide. Furthermore, we discuss how the internal structure of tree-based models may be leveraged to help with computing their marginal feature attributions according to a linear game value. One important observation is that these are simple (piecewise-constant) functions with respect to a certain grid partition of the input space determined by the trained model. Another crucial observation, showcased by experiments with XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost libraries, is that only a portion of all features appears in a tree from the ensemble. Thus, the complexity of computing marginal Shapley (or Owen or Banzhaf) feature attributions may be reduced. This remains valid for a broader class of game values which we shall axiomatically characterize. A prime example is the case of CatBoost models where the trees are oblivious (symmetric) and the number of features in each of them is no larger than the depth. We exploit the symmetry to derive an explicit formula, with improved complexity and only in terms of the internal model parameters, for marginal Shapley (and Banzhaf and Owen) values of CatBoost models. This results in a fast, accurate algorithm for estimating these feature attributions.
Read more5/7/2024
🛠️
0
Shapley Curves: A Smoothing Perspective
Ratmir Miftachov, Georg Keilbar, Wolfgang Karl Hardle
This paper fills the limited statistical understanding of Shapley values as a variable importance measure from a nonparametric (or smoothing) perspective. We introduce population-level textit{Shapley curves} to measure the true variable importance, determined by the conditional expectation function and the distribution of covariates. Having defined the estimand, we derive minimax convergence rates and asymptotic normality under general conditions for the two leading estimation strategies. For finite sample inference, we propose a novel version of the wild bootstrap procedure tailored for capturing lower-order terms in the estimation of Shapley curves. Numerical studies confirm our theoretical findings, and an empirical application analyzes the determining factors of vehicle prices.
Read more4/4/2024