Shapley-PC: Constraint-based Causal Structure Learning with Shapley Values

Overview

• The paper proposes a new algorithm called Shapley-PC for learning causal structures from observational data.
• It builds on the PC algorithm, a well-known constraint-based causal structure learning method.
• The key innovation is the use of Shapley values to quantify the importance of variables in the causal structure.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to learn the causal relationships between different variables or factors in a system, based on observational data alone. It builds on a popular existing method called the PC algorithm, but with an important twist.

The PC algorithm works by identifying conditional independence relationships between variables - for example, if variable A is independent of variable B given some other variables C, then we can infer that A and B are not directly causally linked. The Shapley-PC method goes a step further by using a concept called Shapley values to quantify how important each variable is in determining the overall causal structure.

Shapley values are a way to divide up the "credit" or "blame" for an outcome among the different contributing factors. In the causal structure learning context, the Shapley values tell us how much each variable is contributing to the overall causal relationships that are discovered.

This additional information provided by the Shapley values allows the Shapley-PC algorithm to learn causal structures that are more interpretable and robust compared to the standard PC algorithm. The authors demonstrate through experiments that Shapley-PC outperforms PC on a variety of benchmark datasets.

Technical Explanation

The Shapley-PC algorithm builds on the well-known PC algorithm for constraint-based causal structure learning. The key innovation is the incorporation of Shapley values to quantify the importance of different variables in the causal structure.

The PC algorithm works by iteratively testing conditional independence relationships between variables, and using these to construct a causal graph. Shapley-PC augments this process by computing Shapley values for each variable at each step. The Shapley value of a variable represents its marginal contribution to the causal structure, taking into account all possible subsets of other variables.

By considering the Shapley values, Shapley-PC is able to learn causal structures that are more interpretable and robust compared to standard PC. The Shapley values provide additional information about variable importance that guides the structure learning process.

The authors evaluate Shapley-PC on both synthetic and real-world datasets, and show that it outperforms PC in terms of recovering the true causal structure. They also demonstrate the stability and interpretability advantages of the Shapley-PC approach.

Critical Analysis

The Shapley-PC algorithm is a promising extension of the widely-used PC algorithm for causal structure learning. The incorporation of Shapley values is a clever way to extract more information from the observational data, leading to more robust and interpretable causal models.

However, the authors acknowledge several limitations of their approach. First, computing Shapley values can be computationally expensive, especially as the number of variables grows. The authors propose some approximation techniques, but this remains an area for potential improvement.

Additionally, the Shapley-PC algorithm, like the PC algorithm, assumes that the observed variables include all the relevant causal factors. In real-world settings, this "causal sufficiency" assumption may not hold, leading to biased causal estimates. Further research is needed to address this limitation.

Overall, the Shapley-PC method represents an interesting and valuable contribution to the field of causal structure learning. The use of Shapley values is a conceptually elegant way to enhance a well-established algorithm, and the authors' experimental results are promising. As the authors note, there is still room for refinement and extension of this approach.

Conclusion

The Shapley-PC algorithm proposed in this paper offers a new way to learn causal structures from observational data, building on the well-known PC algorithm. By incorporating Shapley values to quantify variable importance, Shapley-PC is able to learn more interpretable and robust causal models compared to the standard PC method.

While the Shapley-PC approach has some limitations, such as computational complexity and the assumption of causal sufficiency, it represents an intriguing advance in the field of constraint-based causal structure learning. As the authors suggest, there is potential for further refinement and extension of this technique, which could lead to even more powerful causal discovery tools in the future.