Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Genetic Programming

2405.10267

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/20/2024 by Illya Bakurov, Nathan Haut, Wolfgang Banzhaf
Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Genetic Programming

Abstract

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) was recently introduced as a regularization procedure for training deep neural networks. It simultaneously minimizes the fitness (or loss) function and the so-called fitness sharpness. The latter serves as a measure of the nonlinear behavior of a solution and does so by finding solutions that lie in neighborhoods having uniformly similar loss values across all fitness cases. In this contribution, we adapt SAM for tree Genetic Programming (TGP) by exploring the semantic neighborhoods of solutions using two simple approaches. By capitalizing upon perturbing input and output of program trees, sharpness can be estimated and used as a second optimization criterion during the evolution. To better understand the impact of this variant of SAM on TGP, we collect numerous indicators of the evolutionary process, including generalization ability, complexity, diversity, and a recently proposed genotype-phenotype mapping to study the amount of redundancy in trees. The experimental results demonstrate that using any of the two proposed SAM adaptations in TGP allows (i) a significant reduction of tree sizes in the population and (ii) a decrease in redundancy of the trees. When assessed on real-world benchmarks, the generalization ability of the elite solutions does not deteriorate.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new approach called Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) for Genetic Programming (GP), which aims to improve the performance and stability of GP models.
  • SAM is designed to make GP models more robust to noise and uncertainty in the training data by optimizing for both model performance and sharpness (or sensitivity) of the model to small changes in the input.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SAM in GP on several regression benchmarks, showing that it can outperform traditional GP methods in terms of accuracy and stability.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new technique called Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) that can be used in Genetic Programming (GP). GP is a type of machine learning approach that tries to automatically create computer programs to solve problems, often by evolving them over many generations.

The key idea behind SAM is to make GP models more robust and stable, so they can perform well even when the training data contains noise or uncertainty. Normally, GP models are optimized solely for accuracy on the training data. But SAM also optimizes for "sharpness" - how sensitive the model is to small changes in the input. By optimizing for both accuracy and sharpness, the resulting GP models are more stable and can generalize better to new, unseen data.

The researchers tested SAM on several regression problems, where the goal is to predict a continuous numerical output. They found that GP models trained with SAM outperformed traditional GP methods in terms of both accuracy and stability. This suggests that SAM could be a valuable tool for improving the real-world performance of GP systems, making them more reliable and robust to messy, imperfect data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new technique called Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) for training Genetic Programming (GP) models. SAM is designed to optimize GP models not just for accuracy on the training data, but also for sharpness - how sensitive the model is to small perturbations of the input.

Typically, GP models are trained using an objective function that solely focuses on minimizing the prediction error on the training set. However, this can lead to models that are "sharp" or highly sensitive to small changes in the input, making them brittle and prone to poor generalization. SAM addresses this by incorporating a term in the objective function that penalizes sharpness, encouraging the model to learn a "flatter" function that is more robust to noise and uncertainty in the data.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SAM-trained GP models on several regression benchmarks, showing that they can outperform traditional GP methods in terms of both predictive accuracy and stability. They also provide theoretical insights into why SAM can lead to better generalization, by drawing connections to edge stability and the model's robustness to label noise.

Additionally, the paper explores an extension of SAM called "Look-behind SAM" (LBSAM), which further improves stability by considering the model's sensitivity to changes not just in the current input, but also in previous inputs. This can be particularly useful in time-series or sequential prediction tasks.

The authors also present a scalable, surrogate-assisted implementation of SAM for GP called NeurolGP-SM, which combines SAM with neural network surrogates to enable efficient optimization of large-scale GP models.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong case for the benefits of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) in Genetic Programming (GP), demonstrating its ability to improve both the accuracy and stability of GP models on several regression benchmarks. The theoretical analysis linking SAM to edge stability and robustness to label noise is particularly compelling.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to see how SAM-trained GP models perform on a wider range of problem domains, such as classification or symbolic regression tasks, to understand the broader applicability of the technique.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational cost or runtime overhead of SAM compared to traditional GP training, which could be an important consideration for practical applications. The scalability improvements offered by NeurolGP-SM are a step in the right direction, but further investigation into the efficiency and scalability of SAM-based GP would be valuable.

Another area for further research could be the interpretability and explainability of SAM-trained GP models. While GP is often praised for its ability to produce human-readable models, the additional complexity introduced by SAM could potentially impact the interpretability of the final models. Investigating ways to maintain or even enhance the interpretability of SAM-based GP would be a useful direction for future work.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach for improving the robustness and stability of Genetic Programming models, which could have significant implications for the practical application of GP in real-world settings. The authors have provided a solid foundation for future research to build upon and further explore the potential of Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Genetic Programming.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new technique called Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) for training Genetic Programming (GP) models. SAM aims to make GP models more robust and stable by optimizing not just for accuracy on the training data, but also for the sensitivity (or "sharpness") of the model to small changes in the input.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SAM-trained GP models on several regression benchmarks, showing that they can outperform traditional GP methods in terms of both predictive accuracy and stability. They also provide theoretical insights into why SAM can lead to better generalization, and explore an extension called "Look-behind SAM" that further improves stability.

Overall, this research suggests that incorporating sharpness-awareness into the training of Genetic Programming models can be a valuable approach for improving the real-world performance and reliability of GP systems, particularly in applications where robustness to noise and uncertainty is crucial. The authors have laid the groundwork for further exploration and development of SAM-based techniques in the field of Genetic Programming and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Evolutionary Feature Construction in Regression

Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Evolutionary Feature Construction in Regression

Hengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf, Mengjie Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, genetic programming (GP)-based evolutionary feature construction has achieved significant success. However, a primary challenge with evolutionary feature construction is its tendency to overfit the training data, resulting in poor generalization on unseen data. In this research, we draw inspiration from PAC-Bayesian theory and propose using sharpness-aware minimization in function space to discover symbolic features that exhibit robust performance within a smooth loss landscape in the semantic space. By optimizing sharpness in conjunction with cross-validation loss, as well as designing a sharpness reduction layer, the proposed method effectively mitigates the overfitting problem of GP, especially when dealing with a limited number of instances or in the presence of label noise. Experimental results on 58 real-world regression datasets show that our approach outperforms standard GP as well as six state-of-the-art complexity measurement methods for GP in controlling overfitting. Furthermore, the ensemble version of GP with sharpness-aware minimization demonstrates superior performance compared to nine fine-tuned machine learning and symbolic regression algorithms, including XGBoost and LightGBM.

Read more

5/14/2024

A Universal Class of Sharpness-Aware Minimization Algorithms

A Universal Class of Sharpness-Aware Minimization Algorithms

Behrooz Tahmasebi, Ashkan Soleymani, Dara Bahri, Stefanie Jegelka, Patrick Jaillet

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recently, there has been a surge in interest in developing optimization algorithms for overparameterized models as achieving generalization is believed to require algorithms with suitable biases. This interest centers on minimizing sharpness of the original loss function; the Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) algorithm has proven effective. However, most literature only considers a few sharpness measures, such as the maximum eigenvalue or trace of the training loss Hessian, which may not yield meaningful insights for non-convex optimization scenarios like neural networks. Additionally, many sharpness measures are sensitive to parameter invariances in neural networks, magnifying significantly under rescaling parameters. Motivated by these challenges, we introduce a new class of sharpness measures in this paper, leading to new sharpness-aware objective functions. We prove that these measures are textit{universally expressive}, allowing any function of the training loss Hessian matrix to be represented by appropriate hyperparameters. Furthermore, we show that the proposed objective functions explicitly bias towards minimizing their corresponding sharpness measures, and how they allow meaningful applications to models with parameter invariances (such as scale-invariances). Finally, as instances of our proposed general framework, we present textit{Frob-SAM} and textit{Det-SAM}, which are specifically designed to minimize the Frobenius norm and the determinant of the Hessian of the training loss, respectively. We also demonstrate the advantages of our general framework through extensive experiments.

Read more

6/11/2024

Sharpness-Aware Minimization Enhances Feature Quality via Balanced Learning

Sharpness-Aware Minimization Enhances Feature Quality via Balanced Learning

Jacob Mitchell Springer, Vaishnavh Nagarajan, Aditi Raghunathan

YC

0

Reddit

0

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has emerged as a promising alternative optimizer to stochastic gradient descent (SGD). The originally-proposed motivation behind SAM was to bias neural networks towards flatter minima that are believed to generalize better. However, recent studies have shown conflicting evidence on the relationship between flatness and generalization, suggesting that flatness does fully explain SAM's success. Sidestepping this debate, we identify an orthogonal effect of SAM that is beneficial out-of-distribution: we argue that SAM implicitly balances the quality of diverse features. SAM achieves this effect by adaptively suppressing well-learned features which gives remaining features opportunity to be learned. We show that this mechanism is beneficial in datasets that contain redundant or spurious features where SGD falls for the simplicity bias and would not otherwise learn all available features. Our insights are supported by experiments on real data: we demonstrate that SAM improves the quality of features in datasets containing redundant or spurious features, including CelebA, Waterbirds, CIFAR-MNIST, and DomainBed.

Read more

6/3/2024

Efficient Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Molecular Graph Transformer Models

Efficient Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Molecular Graph Transformer Models

Yili Wang, Kaixiong Zhou, Ninghao Liu, Ying Wang, Xin Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) has received increasing attention in computer vision since it can effectively eliminate the sharp local minima from the training trajectory and mitigate generalization degradation. However, SAM requires two sequential gradient computations during the optimization of each step: one to obtain the perturbation gradient and the other to obtain the updating gradient. Compared with the base optimizer (e.g., Adam), SAM doubles the time overhead due to the additional perturbation gradient. By dissecting the theory of SAM and observing the training gradient of the molecular graph transformer, we propose a new algorithm named GraphSAM, which reduces the training cost of SAM and improves the generalization performance of graph transformer models. There are two key factors that contribute to this result: (i) textit{gradient approximation}: we use the updating gradient of the previous step to approximate the perturbation gradient at the intermediate steps smoothly (textbf{increases efficiency}); (ii) textit{loss landscape approximation}: we theoretically prove that the loss landscape of GraphSAM is limited to a small range centered on the expected loss of SAM (textbf{guarantees generalization performance}). The extensive experiments on six datasets with different tasks demonstrate the superiority of GraphSAM, especially in optimizing the model update process. The code is in:https://github.com/YL-wang/GraphSAM/tree/graphsam

Read more

6/21/2024