Lookbehind-SAM: k steps back, 1 step forward

Read original: arXiv:2307.16704 - Published 5/17/2024 by Gonc{c}alo Mordido, Pranshu Malviya, Aristide Baratin, Sarath Chandar
Total Score

0

🎲

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new method called Lookbehind that improves the efficiency of the sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) optimization technique.
  • SAM aims to minimize both the loss value and the loss sharpness, which is a measure of how sensitive the model is to small changes in the input.
  • Lookbehind enhances the maximization step of SAM by performing multiple ascent steps to find a worst-case perturbation that increases the loss.
  • To mitigate the variance introduced by the multiple ascent steps, Lookbehind employs linear interpolation to refine the minimization step.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are often trained to minimize a loss function, which measures how well the model's predictions match the true data. However, minimizing the loss alone may not be enough, as it can lead to models that are sensitive to small changes in the input, a problem known as loss sharpness.

The sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) method tries to address this by formulating the training as a minimax problem, where the goal is to minimize both the loss value and the loss sharpness. This helps to produce more robust and generalizable models.

The paper introduces a new method called Lookbehind that aims to improve the efficiency of the maximization and minimization steps in SAM. Lookbehind takes inspiration from the Lookahead optimizer, which uses multiple descent steps ahead to find a better solution.

In Lookbehind, the authors perform multiple ascent steps behind to find a worst-case perturbation that increases the loss. This helps the model become more robust to such perturbations. To prevent the multiple ascent steps from introducing too much variance, Lookbehind uses linear interpolation to refine the minimization step.

The authors show that Lookbehind leads to improved generalization performance, greater robustness against noisy weights, and better learning with less catastrophic forgetting in lifelong learning settings.

Technical Explanation

The key idea behind Lookbehind is to enhance the maximization step in the sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) objective by performing multiple ascent steps to find a worst-case perturbation that increases the loss. This is inspired by the Lookahead optimizer, which uses multiple descent steps ahead to find a better solution.

Specifically, Lookbehind first performs a single ascent step to find an initial perturbation that increases the loss. It then performs additional ascent steps, using the gradients from the previous steps to guide the search for a perturbation that further increases the loss.

To mitigate the variance introduced by the multiple ascent steps, Lookbehind employs linear interpolation to refine the minimization step. This helps to smooth out the gradients and produce a more stable update direction.

The authors evaluate Lookbehind on a variety of tasks, including image classification, language modeling, and reinforcement learning. They show that Lookbehind leads to improved generalization performance, greater robustness against noisy weights, and better learning with less catastrophic forgetting in lifelong learning settings compared to the standard SAM approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the efficiency of the sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) method. The authors' insight to use multiple ascent steps to find a worst-case perturbation, inspired by the Lookahead optimizer, is a clever and practical extension of the original SAM formulation.

One potential limitation of the Lookbehind method is that the multiple ascent steps may become computationally expensive, especially for larger models or more complex tasks. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to explore more efficient ways of performing the maximization step.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the theoretical properties of Lookbehind, such as its convergence guarantees or the sensitivity of the method to hyperparameter settings. Exploring these aspects could help to better understand the strengths and limitations of the approach.

Overall, the Lookbehind method represents a valuable contribution to the field of robust and stable machine learning. By addressing the loss sharpness issue, the authors have developed a technique that can lead to more generalizable and reliable models, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.

Conclusion

The Lookbehind method introduced in this paper is an important advancement in the field of sharpness-aware minimization (SAM). By enhancing the maximization step of the SAM objective and employing linear interpolation to refine the minimization step, Lookbehind achieves improved generalization performance, greater robustness against noisy weights, and better learning with less catastrophic forgetting in lifelong learning settings.

The paper's insights have the potential to drive further research and development in the area of robust and stable machine learning, which is crucial for deploying reliable AI systems in real-world applications. While the method may have some computational limitations, the authors have demonstrated the value of their approach and opened up new avenues for exploration in this important field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎲

Total Score

0

Lookbehind-SAM: k steps back, 1 step forward

Gonc{c}alo Mordido, Pranshu Malviya, Aristide Baratin, Sarath Chandar

Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) methods have gained increasing popularity by formulating the problem of minimizing both loss value and loss sharpness as a minimax objective. In this work, we increase the efficiency of the maximization and minimization parts of SAM's objective to achieve a better loss-sharpness trade-off. By taking inspiration from the Lookahead optimizer, which uses multiple descent steps ahead, we propose Lookbehind, which performs multiple ascent steps behind to enhance the maximization step of SAM and find a worst-case perturbation with higher loss. Then, to mitigate the variance in the descent step arising from the gathered gradients across the multiple ascent steps, we employ linear interpolation to refine the minimization step. Lookbehind leads to a myriad of benefits across a variety of tasks. Particularly, we show increased generalization performance, greater robustness against noisy weights, as well as improved learning and less catastrophic forgetting in lifelong learning settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/chandar-lab/Lookbehind-SAM.

Read more

5/17/2024

Improving SAM Requires Rethinking its Optimization Formulation
Total Score

0

Improving SAM Requires Rethinking its Optimization Formulation

Wanyun Xie, Fabian Latorre, Kimon Antonakopoulos, Thomas Pethick, Volkan Cevher

This paper rethinks Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), which is originally formulated as a zero-sum game where the weights of a network and a bounded perturbation try to minimize/maximize, respectively, the same differentiable loss. To fundamentally improve this design, we argue that SAM should instead be reformulated using the 0-1 loss. As a continuous relaxation, we follow the simple conventional approach where the minimizing (maximizing) player uses an upper bound (lower bound) surrogate to the 0-1 loss. This leads to a novel formulation of SAM as a bilevel optimization problem, dubbed as BiSAM. BiSAM with newly designed lower-bound surrogate loss indeed constructs stronger perturbation. Through numerical evidence, we show that BiSAM consistently results in improved performance when compared to the original SAM and variants, while enjoying similar computational complexity. Our code is available at https://github.com/LIONS-EPFL/BiSAM.

Read more

7/19/2024

Efficient Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Molecular Graph Transformer Models
Total Score

0

Efficient Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Molecular Graph Transformer Models

Yili Wang, Kaixiong Zhou, Ninghao Liu, Ying Wang, Xin Wang

Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) has received increasing attention in computer vision since it can effectively eliminate the sharp local minima from the training trajectory and mitigate generalization degradation. However, SAM requires two sequential gradient computations during the optimization of each step: one to obtain the perturbation gradient and the other to obtain the updating gradient. Compared with the base optimizer (e.g., Adam), SAM doubles the time overhead due to the additional perturbation gradient. By dissecting the theory of SAM and observing the training gradient of the molecular graph transformer, we propose a new algorithm named GraphSAM, which reduces the training cost of SAM and improves the generalization performance of graph transformer models. There are two key factors that contribute to this result: (i) textit{gradient approximation}: we use the updating gradient of the previous step to approximate the perturbation gradient at the intermediate steps smoothly (textbf{increases efficiency}); (ii) textit{loss landscape approximation}: we theoretically prove that the loss landscape of GraphSAM is limited to a small range centered on the expected loss of SAM (textbf{guarantees generalization performance}). The extensive experiments on six datasets with different tasks demonstrate the superiority of GraphSAM, especially in optimizing the model update process. The code is in:https://github.com/YL-wang/GraphSAM/tree/graphsam

Read more

6/21/2024

Sharpness-Aware Minimization Enhances Feature Quality via Balanced Learning
Total Score

0

Sharpness-Aware Minimization Enhances Feature Quality via Balanced Learning

Jacob Mitchell Springer, Vaishnavh Nagarajan, Aditi Raghunathan

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has emerged as a promising alternative optimizer to stochastic gradient descent (SGD). The originally-proposed motivation behind SAM was to bias neural networks towards flatter minima that are believed to generalize better. However, recent studies have shown conflicting evidence on the relationship between flatness and generalization, suggesting that flatness does fully explain SAM's success. Sidestepping this debate, we identify an orthogonal effect of SAM that is beneficial out-of-distribution: we argue that SAM implicitly balances the quality of diverse features. SAM achieves this effect by adaptively suppressing well-learned features which gives remaining features opportunity to be learned. We show that this mechanism is beneficial in datasets that contain redundant or spurious features where SGD falls for the simplicity bias and would not otherwise learn all available features. Our insights are supported by experiments on real data: we demonstrate that SAM improves the quality of features in datasets containing redundant or spurious features, including CelebA, Waterbirds, CIFAR-MNIST, and DomainBed.

Read more

6/3/2024