SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents SIaM, a self-improving code-assisted mathematical reasoning system for large language models.
- SIaM combines large language models with code-generation capabilities to enhance mathematical problem-solving.
- The system iteratively refines its solutions through a feedback loop, using the generated code to evaluate and improve its responses.
Plain English Explanation
SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models describes a new approach to help large language models (LLMs) become better at solving mathematical problems. The key idea is to combine the natural language understanding capabilities of LLMs with the ability to generate and execute code.
The system works by first having the LLM attempt to solve a math problem. It then generates code based on the LLM's response and runs that code to evaluate the solution. If the solution is incorrect, the system uses the feedback from running the code to refine the LLM's response and try again. This iterative process continues until the system converges on a satisfactory solution.
By incorporating this code-assisted feedback loop, the researchers show that the LLM can gradually improve its mathematical reasoning abilities over time. This approach could be particularly valuable for tasks like solving complex math word problems, where language understanding and symbolic reasoning need to be combined.
Technical Explanation
The method section describes the key components of the SIaM system:
- LLM-based Initial Response: The system starts by having a large language model (e.g., GPT-3) attempt to solve a given math problem in natural language.
- Code Generation: Based on the LLM's initial response, the system uses another model to generate executable code that implements the proposed solution.
- Code Execution and Feedback: The generated code is then executed, and the results are compared to the expected solution. This provides feedback on the quality of the LLM's initial response.
- Response Refinement: Using the feedback from the code execution, the system refines the LLM's original response and repeats the process, iterating until a satisfactory solution is found.
The experiments section demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach on a range of math problem-solving tasks, showing that SIaM can outperform LLMs alone and gradually improve its performance over time.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed approach to enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. The key strength of the SIaM system is its ability to leverage both the language understanding of LLMs and the symbolic manipulation capabilities of code execution to iteratively refine solutions.
One potential limitation discussed in the paper is the need for a reliable code generation model, which can be a challenging task in itself. Additionally, the system may struggle with open-ended or highly creative mathematical problem-solving tasks that require more than just iterative refinement.
Further research could explore ways to make the code generation and execution process more seamless and efficient, as well as investigate how SIaM could be extended to handle a broader range of mathematical reasoning challenges.
Conclusion
SIaM represents an important step forward in combining the strengths of large language models and symbolic reasoning to tackle complex mathematical problems. By closing the feedback loop between natural language understanding and code-based evaluation, the system demonstrates the potential for LLMs to gradually improve their mathematical competence over time.
As AI systems continue to advance, approaches like SIaM could have significant implications for fields that rely heavily on mathematical reasoning, such as scientific research, engineering, and finance. By enhancing the mathematical capabilities of language models, we may be able to unlock new possibilities for human-AI collaboration and problem-solving.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models
Dian Yu, Baolin Peng, Ye Tian, Linfeng Song, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu
There is a growing trend of teaching large language models (LLMs) to solve mathematical problems through coding. Existing studies primarily focus on prompting powerful, closed-source models to generate seed training data followed by in-domain data augmentation, equipping LLMs with considerable capabilities for code-aided mathematical reasoning. However, continually training these models on augmented data derived from a few datasets such as GSM8K may impair their generalization abilities and restrict their effectiveness to a narrow range of question types. Conversely, the potential of improving such LLMs by leveraging large-scale, expert-written, diverse math question-answer pairs remains unexplored. To utilize these resources and tackle unique challenges such as code response assessment, we propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. We also explore different alignment algorithms with self-generated instruction/preference data to foster continuous improvement. Experiments across both in-domain (up to +5.7%) and out-of-domain (+4.4%) benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
Read more8/29/2024
0
Caught in the Quicksand of Reasoning, Far from AGI Summit: Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical and Coding Competency through Ontology-guided Interventions
Pengfei Hong, Navonil Majumder, Deepanway Ghosal, Somak Aditya, Rada Mihalcea, Soujanya Poria
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased striking results on existing logical reasoning benchmarks, with some models even surpassing human performance. However, the true depth of their competencies and robustness in reasoning tasks remains an open question. To this end, in this paper, we focus on two popular reasoning tasks: arithmetic reasoning and code generation. Particularly, we introduce: (i) a general ontology of perturbations for maths and coding questions, (ii) a semi-automatic method to apply these perturbations, and (iii) two datasets, MORE and CORE, respectively, of perturbed maths and coding problems to probe the limits of LLM capabilities in numeric reasoning and coding tasks. Through comprehensive evaluations of both closed-source and open-source LLMs, we show a significant performance drop across all the models against the perturbed questions, suggesting that the current LLMs lack robust problem solving skills and structured reasoning abilities in many areas, as defined by our ontology. We open source the datasets and source codes at: https://github.com/declare-lab/llm_robustness.
Read more6/28/2024
💬
0
Logic Contrastive Reasoning with Lightweight Large Language Model for Math Word Problems
Ding Kai, Ma Zhenguo, Yan Xiaoran
This study focuses on improving the performance of lightweight Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning tasks. We introduce a novel method for measuring mathematical logic similarity and design an automatic screening mechanism to construct a set of reference problems that integrate both semantic and logical similarity. By employing carefully crafted positive and negative example prompts, we guide the model towards adopting sound reasoning logic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to utilize retrieval-enhanced generation for mathematical problem-solving. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a 15.8% improvement over the Chain of Thought approach on the SVAMP dataset and a 21.5 % improvement on the GSM8K dataset. Further application of this method to a large-scale model with 175 billion parameters yields performance comparable to the best results on both aforementioned datasets. Finally, we conduct an analysis of errors during the reasoning process, providing valuable insights and directions for future research on reasoning tasks using large language models.
Read more9/4/2024
💬
0
MuMath-Code: Combining Tool-Use Large Language Models with Multi-perspective Data Augmentation for Mathematical Reasoning
Shuo Yin, Weihao You, Zhilong Ji, Guoqiang Zhong, Jinfeng Bai
The tool-use Large Language Models (LLMs) that integrate with external Python interpreters have significantly enhanced mathematical reasoning capabilities for open-source LLMs, while tool-free methods chose another track: augmenting math reasoning data. However, a great method to integrate the above two research paths and combine their advantages remains to be explored. In this work, we firstly include new math questions via multi-perspective data augmenting methods and then synthesize code-nested solutions to them. The open LLMs (i.e., Llama-2) are finetuned on the augmented dataset to get the resulting models, MuMath-Code ($mu$-Math-Code). During the inference phase, our MuMath-Code generates code and interacts with the external python interpreter to get the execution results. Therefore, MuMath-Code leverages the advantages of both the external tool and data augmentation. To fully leverage the advantages of our augmented data, we propose a two-stage training strategy: In Stage-1, we finetune Llama-2 on pure CoT data to get an intermediate model, which then is trained on the code-nested data in Stage-2 to get the resulting MuMath-Code. Our MuMath-Code-7B achieves 83.8 on GSM8K and 52.4 on MATH, while MuMath-Code-70B model achieves new state-of-the-art performance among open methods -- achieving 90.7% on GSM8K and 55.1% on MATH. Extensive experiments validate the combination of tool use and data augmentation, as well as our two-stage training strategy. We release the proposed dataset along with the associated code for public use.
Read more5/14/2024