Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measures

Overview

• Measuring the similarity of neural networks is an important research topic to understand and improve their behavior.
• This survey provides a comprehensive overview of two complementary perspectives on measuring neural network similarity:
  • Representational similarity, which looks at how the activations of intermediate layers differ.
  • Functional similarity, which looks at how the models differ in their outputs.
• The paper summarizes existing measures, their properties, and relationships, and points to open research problems.

Plain English Explanation

Artificial neural networks are complex machine learning models that are used for all sorts of tasks like image recognition, language processing, and decision-making. As neural networks become more powerful and widely used, it's important for researchers to understand how these models work and how they can be improved.

One key aspect of understanding neural networks is measuring their similarity - how alike or different they are to each other. This survey looks at two main ways of measuring neural network similarity:

1. Representational Similarity: This looks at the internal workings of the neural network, specifically how the "activations" or signals flowing through the different layers of the network differ between models. Models that have similar internal representations may behave in similar ways.

2. Functional Similarity: This looks at the final outputs of the neural network models - how their predictions or decisions differ. Models that produce very different outputs for the same inputs are functionally quite different, even if their internal representations are similar.

By understanding both the representational and functional similarity of neural networks, researchers can gain deeper insights into how these complex models work and find ways to improve their performance, robustness, and interpretability. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the various methods for measuring these different aspects of similarity, as well as directions for future research in this important area.

Technical Explanation

This survey paper provides a detailed overview of two complementary approaches for measuring the similarity of neural network models: representational similarity and functional similarity.

Representational Similarity looks at the internal activations or representations learned by the layers of a neural network. By comparing how the activations differ between models, researchers can understand how the neural networks are processing information differently, even if they produce similar outputs. The paper covers a range of existing measures for quantifying representational similarity, such as layer-wise correlation, subspace angles, and representational dissimilarity matrices.

In contrast, Functional Similarity focuses on the final outputs or decisions produced by neural network models. This perspective looks at how the model predictions or classifications differ, rather than internal representations. Measures of functional similarity include simple output comparisons as well as more sophisticated techniques like task-driven evaluations and differentiable optimization.

The paper summarizes the properties, relationships, and tradeoffs between these different similarity measures. It also highlights open research questions, such as how to best combine representational and functional views to gain a more holistic understanding of neural network similarity.

Critical Analysis

The survey provides a thorough and well-structured overview of the current state of research on measuring neural network similarity. By covering both representational and functional perspectives, the authors give readers a comprehensive understanding of the different approaches and their underlying assumptions.

One potential limitation is that the paper does not delve deeply into the practical applications and real-world implications of these similarity measures. While the technical details are well-covered, the discussion of how these methods can be used to improve neural network design, debugging, and interpretability could be expanded.

Additionally, the survey focuses primarily on pairwise comparisons of neural networks. Extending these similarity measures to handle more complex relationships, such as the evolution of a single network over time or the comparison of multiple networks simultaneously, could be an interesting area for future research.

Overall, this survey lays a strong foundation for understanding the current state-of-the-art in neural network similarity measurement. It will be a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners looking to gain deeper insights into the inner workings of these powerful machine learning models.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey paper provides an important overview of the state of research on measuring the similarity of neural network models. By exploring both representational and functional perspectives, the authors give readers a well-rounded understanding of the different approaches and their respective strengths and limitations.

The detailed descriptions of existing similarity measures, along with the discussion of their properties and relationships, will be a valuable resource for researchers working to improve the interpretability, robustness, and performance of neural networks. Additionally, the identification of open research problems points to exciting future directions in this rapidly evolving field.

Overall, this survey paper lays a solid foundation for more systematic and insightful research on understanding the complex behavior of artificial neural networks - a key step towards unlocking their full potential across a wide range of applications.