The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representations

Read original: arXiv:2309.11028 - Published 6/4/2024 by Baihan Lin, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

🧠

Overview

Explores how to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content
Proposes a new approach called topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA) that uses geo-topological summary statistics to capture the topology of brain representations
Evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of tRSA for model selection using simulations and fMRI data

Plain English Explanation

The human brain is incredibly complex, with different regions responsible for processing different types of information. Scientists have struggled to find ways to accurately describe and compare the representations of this information in the brain.

Previous studies have characterized brain representations by their representational geometry, which is defined by the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM). This approach focuses on how distinguishable different stimuli are from each other. However, the authors of this paper propose going a step further by looking at the topology, or "shape," of these brain representations.

Their new method, called topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA), uses a family of geo-topological summary statistics to capture the topology of brain representations, while downplaying the geometry. They test this approach using both simulated data and real fMRI brain imaging data, and find that it is robust to noise and individual differences, while still being able to detect the unique representational signatures of different brain regions.

This is an important step forward, as it allows researchers to better understand how the brain processes and represents different types of information. By looking at the topology of these representations, rather than just their geometry, scientists can gain new insights into the underlying computational mechanisms at work.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the use of topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA) as a way to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. Traditionally, brain representations have been studied using representational similarity analysis (RSA), which focuses on the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM) - a summary statistic that captures the discriminability of different stimuli.

In this paper, the authors propose going beyond the RDM by considering the topology, or "shape," of the brain representations. They introduce a family of geo-topological summary statistics that can be used to characterize the topology while de-emphasizing the geometry.

The authors evaluate the performance of tRSA using both simulated data and fMRI data. In the simulations, the ground truth is a data-generating layer representation in a neural network model, and the models being compared are the same and other layers in different model instances (trained from different random seeds). In the fMRI experiments, the ground truth is a visual area, and the models are the same and other areas measured in different subjects.

The results show that the topology-sensitive characterizations of population codes are robust to noise and individual variability, while still maintaining excellent sensitivity to the unique representational signatures of different neural network layers and brain regions. This suggests that tRSA can be a powerful tool for calibrating comparisons among representations in brains and models, allowing researchers to focus on the geometry, the topology, or a combination of both.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising new approach for characterizing brain representations, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The simulations and fMRI experiments are relatively limited in scope, focusing on visual processing and neural network layers. It would be important to evaluate the performance of tRSA on a wider range of brain regions and cognitive processes to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.
The paper does not provide much discussion of the specific geo-topological summary statistics used in the tRSA approach, or how they were selected. More insight into the properties and interpretations of these statistics would be helpful for understanding the method.
While the paper emphasizes the robustness of tRSA to noise and individual variability, it would be valuable to explore the method's sensitivity to other factors, such as task demands, attention, or neuromodulation. This could help determine the broader applicability of the approach.
The relationship between the topology of brain representations and their underlying computational mechanisms is not fully explored. Further research could investigate how the topology of representations relates to specific cognitive processes or neural computations.

Overall, the tRSA approach presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the characterization of brain representations. By looking beyond just the geometry of these representations, the authors have opened up new avenues for understanding the complex computational mechanisms of the human brain.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new method called topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA) for characterizing brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. Unlike previous approaches that focused on the geometry of these representations, tRSA considers their topology, or "shape," using a family of geo-topological summary statistics.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of tRSA through both simulations and fMRI experiments, showing that it is robust to noise and individual variability while still being able to detect the unique representational signatures of different brain regions and neural network layers. This suggests that tRSA could be a powerful tool for researchers seeking to understand the complex computational mechanisms underlying brain function.

While the paper presents a promising new approach, there are still some areas for further exploration, such as evaluating tRSA on a wider range of brain regions and cognitive processes, and investigating the relationship between the topology of representations and their underlying computations. Nevertheless, this research represents an important step forward in the quest to characterize the brain's representations of the world around us.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representations

Baihan Lin, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

A central question for neuroscience is how to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. An ideal characterization should distinguish different functional regions with robustness to noise and idiosyncrasies of individual brains that do not correspond to computational differences. Previous studies have characterized brain representations by their representational geometry, which is defined by the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), a summary statistic that abstracts from the roles of individual neurons (or responses channels) and characterizes the discriminability of stimuli. Here we explore a further step of abstraction: from the geometry to the topology of brain representations. We propose topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA), an extension of representational similarity analysis (RSA) that uses a family of geo-topological summary statistics that generalizes the RDM to characterize the topology while de-emphasizing the geometry. We evaluate this new family of statistics in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for model selection using both simulations and fMRI data. In the simulations, the ground truth is a data-generating layer representation in a neural network model and the models are the same and other layers in different model instances (trained from different random seeds). In fMRI, the ground truth is a visual area and the models are the same and other areas measured in different subjects. Results show that topology-sensitive characterizations of population codes are robust to noise and interindividual variability and maintain excellent sensitivity to the unique representational signatures of different neural network layers and brain regions. These methods enable researchers to calibrate comparisons among representations in brains and models to be sensitive to the geometry, the topology, or a combination of both.

6/4/2024

🔮

Topological Representational Similarity Analysis in Brains and Beyond

Baihan Lin

Understanding how the brain represents and processes information is crucial for advancing neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Representational similarity analysis (RSA) has been instrumental in characterizing neural representations, but traditional RSA relies solely on geometric properties, overlooking crucial topological information. This thesis introduces Topological RSA (tRSA), a novel framework combining geometric and topological properties of neural representations. tRSA applies nonlinear monotonic transforms to representational dissimilarities, emphasizing local topology while retaining intermediate-scale geometry. The resulting geo-topological matrices enable model comparisons robust to noise and individual idiosyncrasies. This thesis introduces several key methodological advances: (1) Topological RSA (tRSA) for identifying computational signatures and testing topological hypotheses; (2) Adaptive Geo-Topological Dependence Measure (AGTDM) for detecting complex multivariate relationships; (3) Procrustes-aligned Multidimensional Scaling (pMDS) for revealing neural computation stages; (4) Temporal Topological Data Analysis (tTDA) for uncovering developmental trajectories; and (5) Single-cell Topological Simplicial Analysis (scTSA) for characterizing cell population complexity. Through analyses of neural recordings, biological data, and neural network simulations, this thesis demonstrates the power and versatility of these methods in understanding brains, computational models, and complex biological systems. They not only offer robust approaches for adjudicating among competing models but also reveal novel theoretical insights into the nature of neural computation. This work lays the foundation for future investigations at the intersection of topology, neuroscience, and time series analysis, paving the way for more nuanced understanding of brain function and dysfunction.

8/23/2024

🧠

Characterization of topological structures in different neural network architectures

Pawe{l} 'Swider

One of the most crucial tasks in the future will be to understand what is going on in neural networks, as they will become even more powerful and widely deployed. This work aims to use TDA methods to analyze neural representations. We develop methods for analyzing representations from different architectures and check how one should use them to obtain valid results. Our findings indicate that removing outliers does not have much impact on the results and that we should compare representations with the same number of elements. We applied these methods for ResNet, VGG19, and ViT architectures and found substantial differences along with some similarities. Additionally, we determined that models with similar architecture tend to have a similar topology of representations and models with a larger number of layers change their topology more smoothly. Furthermore, we found that the topology of pre-trained and finetuned models starts to differ in the middle and final layers while remaining quite similar in the initial layers. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of TDA in the analysis of neural network behavior.

7/10/2024

A rank decomposition for the topological classification of neural representations

Kosio Beshkov, Gaute T. Einevoll

Neural networks can be thought of as applying a transformation to an input dataset. The way in which they change the topology of such a dataset often holds practical significance for many tasks, particularly those demanding non-homeomorphic mappings for optimal solutions, such as classification problems. In this work, we leverage the fact that neural networks are equivalent to continuous piecewise-affine maps, whose rank can be used to pinpoint regions in the input space that undergo non-homeomorphic transformations, leading to alterations in the topological structure of the input dataset. Our approach enables us to make use of the relative homology sequence, with which one can study the homology groups of the quotient of a manifold $mathcal{M}$ and a subset $A$, assuming some minimal properties on these spaces. As a proof of principle, we empirically investigate the presence of low-rank (topology-changing) affine maps as a function of network width and mean weight. We show that in randomly initialized narrow networks, there will be regions in which the (co)homology groups of a data manifold can change. As the width increases, the homology groups of the input manifold become more likely to be preserved. We end this part of our work by constructing highly non-random wide networks that do not have this property and relating this non-random regime to Dale's principle, which is a defining characteristic of biological neural networks. Finally, we study simple feedforward networks trained on MNIST, as well as on toy classification and regression tasks, and show that networks manipulate the topology of data differently depending on the continuity of the task they are trained on.

6/5/2024