Simulation, Modelling and Classification of Wiki Contributors: Spotting The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the simulation, modeling, and classification of Wikipedia contributors, aiming to identify the "good," "bad," and "ugly" types of contributors.
- The researchers use various techniques, including agent-based modeling and machine learning, to analyze the behavior and contributions of Wikipedia editors.
- The goal is to develop a better understanding of the complex dynamics within the Wikipedia community and to provide insights for improving content quality and user engagement.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the different types of people who contribute to Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. The researchers use computer simulations and machine learning models to study the behavior and contributions of these Wikipedia editors.
The researchers want to identify the "good" editors who make valuable and accurate additions to Wikipedia, the "bad" editors who try to vandalize or spread misinformation, and the "ugly" editors who are disruptive or unproductive. By understanding these different types of contributors, the researchers hope to find ways to improve the overall quality and usefulness of Wikipedia.
For example, the researchers might use machine learning to automatically detect and flag potentially problematic edits, or they could develop simulations to test strategies for encouraging more "good" contributors to join and stay involved with the Wikipedia community.
Overall, this research aims to provide insights that can help make Wikipedia a more reliable and collaborative platform for sharing knowledge.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a multi-faceted approach to modeling and classifying the behavior of Wikipedia contributors. The researchers use agent-based modeling to simulate the interactions and dynamics within the Wikipedia community. This allows them to explore how factors like user incentives, social influence, and edit quality can affect the overall system.
In addition, the researchers develop machine learning models to automatically classify Wikipedia editors into different categories, such as "good," "bad," and "ugly." These models analyze features like edit patterns, user reputation, and content quality to distinguish between constructive and disruptive contributors.
The researchers evaluate their models using real-world Wikipedia data and find that they can effectively identify different types of editors. They also explore how the simulated and empirical results can inform strategies for promoting positive contributions and mitigating harmful behavior on Wikipedia.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and technically sound analysis of Wikipedia contributor behavior. The use of both agent-based modeling and machine learning techniques allows the researchers to examine the problem from multiple angles and gain a more holistic understanding.
However, one potential limitation of the research is the reliance on historical Wikipedia data, which may not fully capture the evolving nature of the platform and its user community. As Wikipedia continues to grow and change over time, the models and insights presented in this paper may need to be regularly updated and validated.
Additionally, while the classification of "good," "bad," and "ugly" contributors is a useful conceptual framework, the practical implementation of such a system would likely raise ethical and privacy concerns. The researchers acknowledge this and discuss the need for careful consideration of how such a system could be responsibly deployed.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of Wikipedia's complex social dynamics and provides a strong foundation for future research and practical applications in this domain.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive approach to modeling and classifying the behavior of Wikipedia contributors, with the goal of identifying the "good," "bad," and "ugly" types of editors. The researchers employ a combination of agent-based modeling and machine learning techniques to gain insights into the complex dynamics within the Wikipedia community.
The findings from this research could have significant implications for improving the quality and reliability of Wikipedia content, as well as fostering a more collaborative and productive user base. By understanding the different types of contributors and the factors that influence their behavior, platform administrators and the broader Wikipedia community can develop strategies to encourage positive contributions and mitigate disruptive or malicious behavior.
While the research raises some ethical considerations, the insights and methodologies presented in this paper serve as an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to enhance the sustainability and trustworthiness of crowd-sourced knowledge platforms like Wikipedia.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Simulation, Modelling and Classification of Wiki Contributors: Spotting The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Silvia Garc'ia M'endez, F'atima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, Juan Carlos Burguillo Rial, Bruno Veloso, Adriana E. Chis, Horacio Gonz'alez V'elez
Data crowdsourcing is a data acquisition process where groups of voluntary contributors feed platforms with highly relevant data ranging from news, comments, and media to knowledge and classifications. It typically processes user-generated data streams to provide and refine popular services such as wikis, collaborative maps, e-commerce sites, and social networks. Nevertheless, this modus operandi raises severe concerns regarding ill-intentioned data manipulation in adversarial environments. This paper presents a simulation, modelling, and classification approach to automatically identify human and non-human (bots) as well as benign and malign contributors by using data fabrication to balance classes within experimental data sets, data stream modelling to build and update contributor profiles and, finally, autonomic data stream classification. By employing WikiVoyage - a free worldwide wiki travel guide open to contribution from the general public - as a testbed, our approach proves to significantly boost the confidence and quality of the classifier by using a class-balanced data stream, comprising both real and synthetic data. Our empirical results show that the proposed method distinguishes between benign and malign bots as well as human contributors with a classification accuracy of up to 92 %.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Data Quality in Crowdsourcing and Spamming Behavior Detection
Yang Ba, Michelle V. Mancenido, Erin K. Chiou, Rong Pan
As crowdsourcing emerges as an efficient and cost-effective method for obtaining labels for machine learning datasets, it is important to assess the quality of crowd-provided data, so as to improve analysis performance and reduce biases in subsequent machine learning tasks. Given the lack of ground truth in most cases of crowdsourcing, we refer to data quality as annotators' consistency and credibility. Unlike the simple scenarios where Kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient usually can apply, online crowdsourcing requires dealing with more complex situations. We introduce a systematic method for evaluating data quality and detecting spamming threats via variance decomposition, and we classify spammers into three categories based on their different behavioral patterns. A spammer index is proposed to assess entire data consistency and two metrics are developed to measure crowd worker's credibility by utilizing the Markov chain and generalized random effects models. Furthermore, we showcase the practicality of our techniques and their advantages by applying them on a face verification task with both simulation and real-world data collected from two crowdsourcing platforms.
Read more4/30/2024
0
Interpretable classification of wiki-review streams
Silvia Garc'ia M'endez, F'atima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, Juan Carlos Burguillo Rial
Wiki articles are created and maintained by a crowd of editors, producing a continuous stream of reviews. Reviews can take the form of additions, reverts, or both. This crowdsourcing model is exposed to manipulation since neither reviews nor editors are automatically screened and purged. To protect articles against vandalism or damage, the stream of reviews can be mined to classify reviews and profile editors in real-time. The goal of this work is to anticipate and explain which reviews to revert. This way, editors are informed why their edits will be reverted. The proposed method employs stream-based processing, updating the profiling and classification models on each incoming event. The profiling uses side and content-based features employing Natural Language Processing, and editor profiles are incrementally updated based on their reviews. Since the proposed method relies on self-explainable classification algorithms, it is possible to understand why a review has been classified as a revert or a non-revert. In addition, this work contributes an algorithm for generating synthetic data for class balancing, making the final classification fairer. The proposed online method was tested with a real data set from Wikivoyage, which was balanced through the aforementioned synthetic data generation. The results attained near-90 % values for all evaluation metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure).
Read more5/29/2024
0
Exposing and Explaining Fake News On-the-Fly
Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez, F'atima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, Juan Carlos Burguillo
Social media platforms enable the rapid dissemination and consumption of information. However, users instantly consume such content regardless of the reliability of the shared data. Consequently, the latter crowdsourcing model is exposed to manipulation. This work contributes with an explainable and online classification method to recognize fake news in real-time. The proposed method combines both unsupervised and supervised Machine Learning approaches with online created lexica. The profiling is built using creator-, content- and context-based features using Natural Language Processing techniques. The explainable classification mechanism displays in a dashboard the features selected for classification and the prediction confidence. The performance of the proposed solution has been validated with real data sets from Twitter and the results attain 80 % accuracy and macro F-measure. This proposal is the first to jointly provide data stream processing, profiling, classification and explainability. Ultimately, the proposed early detection, isolation and explanation of fake news contribute to increase the quality and trustworthiness of social media contents.
Read more9/6/2024