Data Quality in Crowdsourcing and Spamming Behavior Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores data quality issues in crowdsourcing and techniques to detect spamming behavior.
- The researchers investigate how to ensure the reliability and validity of crowdsourced data by identifying and removing low-quality responses.
- They propose a framework for detecting spamming behavior, which is a common problem in crowdsourcing that can significantly impact data quality.
Plain English Explanation
Crowdsourcing is a way of getting work done by asking many people (the "crowd") to contribute small pieces of a larger task. This can be a cost-effective way to gather large amounts of data or complete complex projects. However, the quality of the data collected through crowdsourcing can be inconsistent, as some contributors may provide low-quality or even intentionally misleading responses (known as "spamming").
This paper focuses on addressing these data quality issues in crowdsourcing. The researchers developed techniques to identify and remove low-quality or spamming responses, helping to ensure the reliability and validity of the crowdsourced data. Their framework for detecting spamming behavior is particularly important, as spammers can significantly compromise the usefulness of crowdsourced data.
By improving data quality in crowdsourcing, this research can help organizations and researchers who rely on crowdsourced data to make more informed decisions and draw more accurate conclusions. The techniques proposed in this paper can be applied to a wide range of crowdsourcing applications, from market research to scientific studies.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing related work on data quality in crowdsourcing and spamming behavior detection. The authors note that while previous studies have explored these issues, there is a need for a more comprehensive framework to address data quality challenges in crowdsourcing.
The researchers then present their proposed approach, which includes several key components:
- Response Quality Assessment: The authors develop methods to assess the quality of individual crowdsourced responses, considering factors such as response time, content similarity, and worker reputation.
- Spamming Behavior Detection: The researchers propose a model to identify spamming behavior, which can involve techniques like analyzing response patterns, detecting duplicate submissions, and flagging suspicious worker profiles.
- Crowdsourced Data Cleaning: Building on the quality assessment and spamming detection components, the authors describe a process for cleaning crowdsourced data by removing low-quality or spamming responses.
The paper also discusses the results of experiments the researchers conducted to validate their approach, showing its effectiveness in improving the quality of crowdsourced data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive framework for addressing data quality issues in crowdsourcing, which is an important and practical problem. The authors' approach to response quality assessment and spamming behavior detection seems well-designed and based on sound principles.
However, one potential limitation of the research is that it does not extensively explore the impact of different types of crowdsourcing tasks or the characteristics of the crowd on the effectiveness of their techniques. The Multi-News dataset used in the experiments may not be representative of all crowdsourcing scenarios, and the authors acknowledge the need for further testing in diverse settings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential pitfalls or unintended consequences of overly aggressive data cleaning. While removing low-quality or spamming responses is important, there is a risk of also discarding valid contributions, particularly in cases where the crowd is large and diverse. The authors could have addressed this balance more explicitly.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of crowdsourcing by providing a robust framework for improving data quality. The techniques described could be especially helpful for organizations and researchers relying on customer-level fraud detection in crowdsourced data.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive approach to addressing data quality issues in crowdsourcing, with a focus on detecting and mitigating spamming behavior. The researchers' framework for assessing response quality, identifying spamming patterns, and cleaning crowdsourced data offers a promising solution to a significant challenge in this field.
By improving the reliability and validity of crowdsourced data, this work can enhance the usefulness of crowdsourcing for a wide range of applications, from market research to scientific studies. The techniques described in this paper could be particularly valuable for organizations or researchers who rely on crowdsourced data to make important decisions or draw conclusions.
While the authors acknowledge the need for further testing and refinement, this paper represents an important step forward in addressing the complex data quality issues that can arise in crowdsourcing environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Data Quality in Crowdsourcing and Spamming Behavior Detection
Yang Ba, Michelle V. Mancenido, Erin K. Chiou, Rong Pan
As crowdsourcing emerges as an efficient and cost-effective method for obtaining labels for machine learning datasets, it is important to assess the quality of crowd-provided data, so as to improve analysis performance and reduce biases in subsequent machine learning tasks. Given the lack of ground truth in most cases of crowdsourcing, we refer to data quality as annotators' consistency and credibility. Unlike the simple scenarios where Kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient usually can apply, online crowdsourcing requires dealing with more complex situations. We introduce a systematic method for evaluating data quality and detecting spamming threats via variance decomposition, and we classify spammers into three categories based on their different behavioral patterns. A spammer index is proposed to assess entire data consistency and two metrics are developed to measure crowd worker's credibility by utilizing the Markov chain and generalized random effects models. Furthermore, we showcase the practicality of our techniques and their advantages by applying them on a face verification task with both simulation and real-world data collected from two crowdsourcing platforms.
Read more4/30/2024
0
Simulation, Modelling and Classification of Wiki Contributors: Spotting The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Silvia Garc'ia M'endez, F'atima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, Juan Carlos Burguillo Rial, Bruno Veloso, Adriana E. Chis, Horacio Gonz'alez V'elez
Data crowdsourcing is a data acquisition process where groups of voluntary contributors feed platforms with highly relevant data ranging from news, comments, and media to knowledge and classifications. It typically processes user-generated data streams to provide and refine popular services such as wikis, collaborative maps, e-commerce sites, and social networks. Nevertheless, this modus operandi raises severe concerns regarding ill-intentioned data manipulation in adversarial environments. This paper presents a simulation, modelling, and classification approach to automatically identify human and non-human (bots) as well as benign and malign contributors by using data fabrication to balance classes within experimental data sets, data stream modelling to build and update contributor profiles and, finally, autonomic data stream classification. By employing WikiVoyage - a free worldwide wiki travel guide open to contribution from the general public - as a testbed, our approach proves to significantly boost the confidence and quality of the classifier by using a class-balanced data stream, comprising both real and synthetic data. Our empirical results show that the proposed method distinguishes between benign and malign bots as well as human contributors with a classification accuracy of up to 92 %.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Learning From Crowdsourced Noisy Labels: A Signal Processing Perspective
Shahana Ibrahim, Panagiotis A. Traganitis, Xiao Fu, Georgios B. Giannakis
One of the primary catalysts fueling advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) is the availability of massive, curated datasets. A commonly used technique to curate such massive datasets is crowdsourcing, where data are dispatched to multiple annotators. The annotator-produced labels are then fused to serve downstream learning and inference tasks. This annotation process often creates noisy labels due to various reasons, such as the limited expertise, or unreliability of annotators, among others. Therefore, a core objective in crowdsourcing is to develop methods that effectively mitigate the negative impact of such label noise on learning tasks. This feature article introduces advances in learning from noisy crowdsourced labels. The focus is on key crowdsourcing models and their methodological treatments, from classical statistical models to recent deep learning-based approaches, emphasizing analytical insights and algorithmic developments. In particular, this article reviews the connections between signal processing (SP) theory and methods, such as identifiability of tensor and nonnegative matrix factorization, and novel, principled solutions of longstanding challenges in crowdsourcing -- showing how SP perspectives drive the advancements of this field. Furthermore, this article touches upon emerging topics that are critical for developing cutting-edge AI/ML systems, such as crowdsourcing in reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) and direct preference optimization (DPO) that are key techniques for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs).
Read more7/10/2024
📊
0
Crowdsourcing with Enhanced Data Quality Assurance: An Efficient Approach to Mitigate Resource Scarcity Challenges in Training Large Language Models for Healthcare
P. Barai, G. Leroy, P. Bisht, J. M. Rothman, S. Lee, J. Andrews, S. A. Rice, A. Ahmed
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense potential in artificial intelligence across various domains, including healthcare. However, their efficacy is hindered by the need for high-quality labeled data, which is often expensive and time-consuming to create, particularly in low-resource domains like healthcare. To address these challenges, we propose a crowdsourcing (CS) framework enriched with quality control measures at the pre-, real-time-, and post-data gathering stages. Our study evaluated the effectiveness of enhancing data quality through its impact on LLMs (Bio-BERT) for predicting autism-related symptoms. The results show that real-time quality control improves data quality by 19 percent compared to pre-quality control. Fine-tuning Bio-BERT using crowdsourced data generally increased recall compared to the Bio-BERT baseline but lowered precision. Our findings highlighted the potential of crowdsourcing and quality control in resource-constrained environments and offered insights into optimizing healthcare LLMs for informed decision-making and improved patient care.
Read more5/24/2024