Size and depth of monotone neural networks: interpolation and approximation
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the expressive power and efficiency of representation of monotone neural networks with threshold gates, where all the weights (except for the biases) are non-negative.
- The key findings include:
- Every monotone function over [0, 1]^d can be approximated within small error by a depth-4 monotone network.
- There are monotone real functions that can be efficiently computed by networks with no restrictions on the gates, but monotone networks approximating these functions need exponential size in the dimension.
Plain English Explanation
Monotone neural networks are a type of artificial neural network where all the weights (except the biases) are non-negative. This means the network can only learn "monotone" functions, where the output increases as the inputs increase.
The researchers wanted to understand how powerful these monotone networks can be and how efficiently they can represent different types of functions. Their first key finding is that any monotone function over a [0, 1] cube (like a 3D cube) can be approximated very closely by a moderately deep (4 layers) monotone network. This improves on previous constructions, which required deeper networks.
The second main result is that there are some monotone functions that can be computed very efficiently by regular neural networks (with no restrictions on the weights), but monotone networks need exponentially more size (number of neurons) to approximate these functions. This suggests there are limitations to the efficiency of monotone networks compared to unconstrained networks, even for monotone functions.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the representational power and efficiency of monotone neural networks with threshold gates. In these networks, all the weights (excluding the biases) are required to be non-negative.
The first key result shows that every monotone function over the [0, 1]^d hypercube can be approximated within an arbitrarily small additive error by a depth-4 monotone threshold network. This improves upon the previous best construction, which had depth d+1. The proof involves solving the monotone interpolation problem for monotone datasets using a depth-4 monotone threshold network.
The second main result compares the size bounds between monotone and unconstrained neural networks with threshold gates. The authors find that there are monotone real functions that can be computed efficiently by networks with no restrictions on the gates, but monotone networks approximating these functions need exponential size in the dimension. This suggests fundamental limits to the efficiency of monotone networks, even for monotone functions.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes important contributions to understanding the representational power and limitations of monotone neural networks. The depth-4 construction for approximating monotone functions is a significant improvement over prior work, suggesting monotone networks may be more expressive than previously thought.
However, the second result indicates that there are still inherent constraints on the efficiency of monotone networks compared to unconstrained architectures, even for monotone functions. This raises interesting questions about the tradeoffs between the interpretability/robustness of monotone networks and their representational capacity.
It would be valuable to further explore the practical implications of these findings, such as how monotone networks might perform on real-world tasks compared to more flexible architectures. Investigating the types of monotone functions that can be efficiently computed, and their potential applications, could also be an insightful direction for future research.
Conclusion
This paper provides new insights into the expressive power and efficiency of monotone neural networks with threshold gates. The key findings demonstrate that these constrained networks can approximate a wide range of monotone functions, while also highlighting fundamental limitations in their representational capacity compared to unconstrained architectures.
These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the tradeoffs involved in designing neural network models, particularly when interpretability and robustness are important considerations. Further research in this area could yield valuable insights for developing more efficient and effective AI systems across a variety of domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Size and depth of monotone neural networks: interpolation and approximation
Dan Mikulincer, Daniel Reichman
We study monotone neural networks with threshold gates where all the weights (other than the biases) are non-negative. We focus on the expressive power and efficiency of representation of such networks. Our first result establishes that every monotone function over $[0,1]^d$ can be approximated within arbitrarily small additive error by a depth-4 monotone network. When $d > 3$, we improve upon the previous best-known construction which has depth $d+1$. Our proof goes by solving the monotone interpolation problem for monotone datasets using a depth-4 monotone threshold network. In our second main result we compare size bounds between monotone and arbitrary neural networks with threshold gates. We find that there are monotone real functions that can be computed efficiently by networks with no restriction on the gates whereas monotone networks approximating these functions need exponential size in the dimension.
Read more4/30/2024
🤿
0
Approximation and interpolation of deep neural networks
Vlad-Raul Constantinescu, Ionel Popescu
In this paper, we prove that in the overparametrized regime, deep neural network provide universal approximations and can interpolate any data set, as long as the activation function is locally in $L^1(RR)$ and not an affine function. Additionally, if the activation function is smooth and such an interpolation networks exists, then the set of parameters which interpolate forms a manifold. Furthermore, we give a characterization of the Hessian of the loss function evaluated at the interpolation points. In the last section, we provide a practical probabilistic method of finding such a point under general conditions on the activation function.
Read more4/26/2024
🏋️
0
Smooth Min-Max Monotonic Networks
Christian Igel
Monotonicity constraints are powerful regularizers in statistical modelling. They can support fairness in computer-aided decision making and increase plausibility in data-driven scientific models. The seminal min-max (MM) neural network architecture ensures monotonicity, but often gets stuck in undesired local optima during training because of partial derivatives of the MM nonlinearities being zero. We propose a simple modification of the MM network using strictly-increasing smooth minimum and maximum functions that alleviates this problem. The resulting smooth min-max (SMM) network module inherits the asymptotic approximation properties from the MM architecture. It can be used within larger deep learning systems trained end-to-end. The SMM module is conceptually simple and computationally less demanding than state-of-the-art neural networks for monotonic modelling. Our experiments show that this does not come with a loss in generalization performance compared to alternative neural and non-neural approaches.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Optimal Neural Network Approximation for High-Dimensional Continuous Functions
Ayan Maiti, Michelle Michelle, Haizhao Yang
Recently, the authors of Shen Yang Zhang (JMLR, 2022) developed a neural network with width $36d(2d + 1)$ and depth $11$, which utilizes a special activation function called the elementary universal activation function, to achieve the super approximation property for functions in $C([a,b]^d)$. That is, the constructed network only requires a fixed number of neurons to approximate a $d$-variate continuous function on a $d$-dimensional hypercube with arbitrary accuracy. Their network uses $mathcal{O}(d^2)$ fixed neurons. One natural question to address is whether we can reduce the number of these neurons in such a network. By leveraging a variant of the Kolmogorov Superposition Theorem, our analysis shows that there is a neural network generated by the elementary universal activation function with only $366d +365$ fixed, intrinsic (non-repeated) neurons that attains this super approximation property. Furthermore, we present a family of continuous functions that requires at least width $d$, and therefore at least $d$ intrinsic neurons, to achieve arbitrary accuracy in its approximation. This shows that the requirement of $mathcal{O}(d)$ intrinsic neurons is optimal in the sense that it grows linearly with the input dimension $d$, unlike some approximation methods where parameters may grow exponentially with $d$.
Read more9/11/2024