Smoothed Online Classification can be Harder than Batch Classification

Read original: arXiv:2405.15424 - Published 5/27/2024 by Vinod Raman, Unique Subedi, Ambuj Tewari
Total Score

0

🏷️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the theoretical challenges of online classification compared to batch classification, particularly in the context of smoothed online classification.
  • It demonstrates that smoothed online classification can be significantly harder than batch classification, even in simple settings.
  • The paper provides theoretical results and examples to illustrate this phenomenon.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, there are two main approaches to classification tasks: batch classification and online classification. Batch classification involves training a model on a fixed dataset all at once, while online classification involves gradually updating the model as new data becomes available.

https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/online-classification-predictions The paper examines a specific type of online classification called "smoothed online classification," where the model is trained on a sequence of data points that are slightly perturbed or "smoothed" to improve its performance.

The key insight of the paper is that smoothed online classification can actually be more challenging than batch classification, even in simple settings. The authors provide theoretical results and examples to demonstrate this counterintuitive finding.

One way to think about this is that the online setting introduces additional complexity and uncertainty that the model has to contend with as it learns, compared to the more stable batch setting. The smoothing process, while intended to help, can actually exacerbate these challenges in certain situations.

https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/generalization-bounds-dependent-data-using-online-to This work contributes to our understanding of the fundamental tradeoffs and limitations in online learning, which is an important area of research as machine learning models are increasingly deployed in dynamic, real-world environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper formally defines the smoothed online classification problem and compares it to the batch classification setting. It establishes theoretical results showing that even in simple cases, the smoothed online setting can be significantly harder than batch classification.

https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/characterization-semi-supervised-adversarially-robust-pac-learnability The authors construct examples where the sample complexity (the number of training examples required) for smoothed online classification is exponentially larger than for batch classification. They also provide generalization bounds to quantify this gap.

https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/generalized-approach-to-online-convex-optimization Technically, the core challenge is that the online setting introduces additional "drift" or shift in the data distribution over time, which the model has to adapt to. This drift can interact with the smoothing process in ways that make the learning problem significantly harder.

https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/online-learning-halfspaces-massart-noise The paper also discusses connections to other related settings, such as learning with adversarial perturbations, to provide further insights into the theoretical foundations of online learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents rigorous theoretical results, but it is important to note that the analysis is limited to specific model classes and assumptions. In practice, the relative difficulty of online versus batch classification may depend heavily on the problem domain, the available data, and the specific techniques used.

The authors acknowledge that their findings apply to "simple" settings, and it remains an open question how these results extend to more complex, real-world scenarios. Further empirical and theoretical research is needed to understand the broader implications.

Additionally, while the paper highlights the challenges of smoothed online classification, it does not offer concrete solutions or strategies to overcome these difficulties. Exploring effective techniques for online learning in the presence of distribution shift is an important area for future work.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the theoretical limits of online classification, particularly in the context of smoothed online learning. The key insight that smoothed online classification can be exponentially harder than batch classification is a surprising and important result.

https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/online-classification-predictions While the findings are limited to specific settings, they highlight the need for further research on the challenges and trade-offs in online learning. As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in dynamic, real-world environments, developing effective techniques for online classification remains a crucial problem.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏷️

Total Score

0

Smoothed Online Classification can be Harder than Batch Classification

Vinod Raman, Unique Subedi, Ambuj Tewari

We study online classification under smoothed adversaries. In this setting, at each time point, the adversary draws an example from a distribution that has a bounded density with respect to a fixed base measure, which is known apriori to the learner. For binary classification and scalar-valued regression, previous works citep{haghtalab2020smoothed, block2022smoothed} have shown that smoothed online learning is as easy as learning in the iid batch setting under PAC model. However, we show that smoothed online classification can be harder than the iid batch classification when the label space is unbounded. In particular, we construct a hypothesis class that is learnable in the iid batch setting under the PAC model but is not learnable under the smoothed online model. Finally, we identify a condition that ensures that the PAC learnability of a hypothesis class is sufficient for its smoothed online learnability.

Read more

5/27/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Online Classification with Predictions

Vinod Raman, Ambuj Tewari

We study online classification when the learner has access to predictions about future examples. We design an online learner whose expected regret is never worse than the worst-case regret, gracefully improves with the quality of the predictions, and can be significantly better than the worst-case regret when the predictions of future examples are accurate. As a corollary, we show that if the learner is always guaranteed to observe data where future examples are easily predictable, then online learning can be as easy as transductive online learning. Our results complement recent work in online algorithms with predictions and smoothed online classification, which go beyond a worse-case analysis by using machine-learned predictions and distributional assumptions respectively.

Read more

5/24/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Generalization bounds for mixing processes via delayed online-to-PAC conversions

Baptiste Abeles, Eugenio Clerico, Gergely Neu

We study the generalization error of statistical learning algorithms in a non-i.i.d. setting, where the training data is sampled from a stationary mixing process. We develop an analytic framework for this scenario based on a reduction to online learning with delayed feedback. In particular, we show that the existence of an online learning algorithm with bounded regret (against a fixed statistical learning algorithm in a specially constructed game of online learning with delayed feedback) implies low generalization error of said statistical learning method even if the data sequence is sampled from a mixing time series. The rates demonstrate a trade-off between the amount of delay in the online learning game and the degree of dependence between consecutive data points, with near-optimal rates recovered in a number of well-studied settings when the delay is tuned appropriately as a function of the mixing time of the process.

Read more

6/19/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Generalization Bounds for Dependent Data using Online-to-Batch Conversion

Sagnik Chatterjee, Manuj Mukherjee, Alhad Sethi

In this work, we give generalization bounds of statistical learning algorithms trained on samples drawn from a dependent data source, both in expectation and with high probability, using the Online-to-Batch conversion paradigm. We show that the generalization error of statistical learners in the dependent data setting is equivalent to the generalization error of statistical learners in the i.i.d. setting up to a term that depends on the decay rate of the underlying mixing stochastic process and is independent of the complexity of the statistical learner. Our proof techniques involve defining a new notion of stability of online learning algorithms based on Wasserstein distances and employing near-martingale concentration bounds for dependent random variables to arrive at appropriate upper bounds for the generalization error of statistical learners trained on dependent data.

Read more

5/24/2024