A Characterization of Semi-Supervised Adversarially-Robust PAC Learnability

Overview

• This paper studies the problem of learning an adversarially robust predictor in a semi-supervised PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) model.
• It addresses the question of how many labeled and unlabeled examples are required to ensure learning in the presence of adversarial attacks during test time.
• The key finding is that having enough unlabeled data (the size of a labeled sample that a fully-supervised method would require), the labeled sample complexity can be arbitrarily smaller compared to previous works, and is sharply characterized by a different complexity measure.
• The paper proves nearly matching upper and lower bounds on this sample complexity, showing a significant benefit in semi-supervised robust learning even in the worst-case distribution-free model.
• It also establishes a gap between the supervised and semi-supervised label complexities, which is known not to hold in standard non-robust PAC learning.

Plain English Explanation

In this research, the authors investigate how to train machine learning models that are resilient to adversarial attacks - that is, attacks where small, intentional changes are made to the input data to trick the model into making incorrect predictions. They focus on a setting where the model has access to both labeled (with known correct outputs) and unlabeled (without known outputs) data.

The key insight is that by leveraging the unlabeled data, the model can learn to be more robust with fewer labeled examples than would be required in a fully supervised setting. This is because the unlabeled data can help the model better understand the underlying patterns in the data, which makes it more resistant to the types of perturbations used in adversarial attacks.

The authors provide a mathematical analysis to determine exactly how much labeled and unlabeled data is needed to achieve this robust learning. They show that if you have enough unlabeled data (roughly the same amount a fully supervised model would need), then the number of labeled examples required can be significantly reduced. This is an important finding, as obtaining labeled data is often the most expensive and time-consuming part of training machine learning models.

The results establish a fundamental difference between standard machine learning and adversarially robust learning. While the labeled data requirements are typically the same in both cases, the authors demonstrate that semi-supervised learning can provide a unique advantage for building models that are resilient to adversarial attacks.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the problem of learning an adversarially robust predictor in the semi-supervised PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) model. The goal is to understand how many labeled and unlabeled examples are required to ensure learning in the presence of adversarial attacks during test time.

The key technical contribution is showing that having enough unlabeled data (the size of a labeled sample that a fully-supervised method would require), the labeled sample complexity can be arbitrarily smaller compared to previous works. This labeled sample complexity is sharply characterized by a different complexity measure, and the authors prove nearly matching upper and lower bounds on this sample complexity.

This result demonstrates a significant benefit in semi-supervised robust learning even in the worst-case distribution-free model, and establishes a gap between the supervised and semi-supervised label complexities. This gap is known not to hold in standard non-robust PAC learning.

The technical analysis involves leveraging ideas from positive-unlabeled contrastive learning and data-dependent hypothesis sets to derive the sample complexity bounds.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding the benefits of semi-supervised learning in the context of adversarially robust prediction. The authors carefully analyze the sample complexity requirements and establish non-trivial gaps between the supervised and semi-supervised settings.

One potential limitation is that the analysis is performed in the distribution-free PAC model, which may not fully capture the nuances of real-world data distributions. It would be interesting to see how these results translate to more realistic data scenarios, potentially building on frameworks like SimplePro.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the classical PAC setting with a binary classification task. Extensions to more complex prediction problems, such as regression or structured prediction, could be valuable directions for future research.

While the theoretical insights are significant, the paper does not provide any empirical validation of the proposed techniques. Implementing and evaluating the semi-supervised robust learning approaches on benchmark datasets would help bridge the gap between theory and practice.

Overall, this work makes an important contribution to our understanding of the fundamental limits of adversarially robust learning and highlights the potential benefits of leveraging unlabeled data, which is an active area of research in machine learning.

Conclusion

This paper explores the problem of learning adversarially robust predictors in a semi-supervised setting, providing a rigorous theoretical analysis of the labeled and unlabeled data requirements. The key finding is that by utilizing enough unlabeled data, the labeled sample complexity can be significantly reduced compared to fully supervised methods, demonstrating a unique advantage of semi-supervised robust learning.

The results establish a gap between supervised and semi-supervised label complexities, which is not observed in standard non-robust PAC learning. This highlights the fundamental differences between building models that are resilient to adversarial attacks and standard machine learning tasks.

While the theoretical insights are valuable, further research is needed to validate the proposed techniques on real-world datasets and extend the analysis to more complex prediction problems. Nonetheless, this work contributes to our understanding of the limits and benefits of adversarially robust learning, which is an important area of machine learning with significant practical implications.