Social Evolution of Published Text and The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence Through Large Language Models and The Problem of Toxicity and Bias

Read original: arXiv:2402.07166 - Published 5/20/2024 by Arifa Khan, P. Saravanan, S. K Venkatesan
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Provides a high-level perspective on the rapid advancements in AI and Deep Learning, particularly in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Aims to place these developments in a broader historical and social context, without exaggeration or undue pessimism
  • Acknowledges the potential issues and limitations of LLMs, including toxicity, bias, memorization, sycophancy, logical inconsistencies, and hallucinations

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the recent breakthroughs in AI and deep learning, particularly the emergence of large language models (LLMs). These models, such as ChatGPT and DALL-E 3, have shown remarkable capabilities in tasks like language generation and visual creation.

The researchers aim to provide a balanced perspective on these developments, neither overly hyping them nor falling into the pessimism that led to the "AI winter" of the 1970s-1990s. They acknowledge the significant progress made, but also caution against the potential issues with LLMs, such as toxicity, bias, and logical inconsistencies.

The paper also draws an interesting parallel between the emergence of human-level intelligence and the scaling up of the primate brain. Just as LLMs seem to reach a threshold in the number of neural connections or weights, the human brain may be a scaled-up version of the primate brain, with intelligence emerging as an "emergent phenomenon of scale."

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the rapid advancements in AI and deep learning, focusing on the recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs). The researchers aim to place these developments in a broader historical and social context, avoiding both exaggeration and undue pessimism.

The paper acknowledges the significant progress made in LLMs, which have demonstrated impressive capabilities in tasks such as language generation and visual creation. However, the researchers also highlight the potential issues with these models, including toxicity, bias, memorization, sycophancy, logical inconsistencies, and hallucinations.

Interestingly, the paper draws a parallel between the emergence of human-level intelligence and the scaling up of the primate brain. The researchers suggest that, just as LLMs seem to reach a threshold in the number of neural connections or weights, the human brain may be a scaled-up version of the primate brain, with intelligence emerging as an "emergent phenomenon of scale." This perspective provides a novel framework for understanding the nature of human intelligence and its relationship to AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a balanced and thoughtful perspective on the rapid developments in AI and deep learning, acknowledging both the significant progress and the potential issues with LLMs. The researchers' efforts to avoid both exaggeration and undue pessimism are commendable, as they aim to maintain a pragmatic and socially aware approach to language technologies.

However, the paper could have delved deeper into some of the specific challenges and limitations of LLMs, such as the risks of knowledge collapse or the opportunities and challenges in human-robot interaction. Additionally, the researchers could have explored more concrete ways to address the issues they identify, rather than simply pointing them out.

Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse around the societal implications of AI and deep learning, encouraging readers to think critically about the rapid advancements in this field.

Conclusion

This paper offers a balanced and pragmatic perspective on the rapid developments in AI and deep learning, particularly in the realm of large language models (LLMs). The researchers acknowledge the significant progress made, while also highlighting the potential issues and limitations of these models, such as toxicity, bias, and logical inconsistencies.

Importantly, the paper places these advancements in a broader historical and social context, avoiding both exaggeration and undue pessimism. The researchers also draw an intriguing parallel between the emergence of human-level intelligence and the scaling up of the primate brain, providing a novel framework for understanding the nature of intelligence.

Overall, this paper encourages readers to think critically about the rapid advancements in AI and deep learning, and to consider the societal implications of these technologies in a nuanced and thoughtful manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Social Evolution of Published Text and The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence Through Large Language Models and The Problem of Toxicity and Bias

Arifa Khan, P. Saravanan, S. K Venkatesan

We provide a birds eye view of the rapid developments in AI and Deep Learning that has led to the path-breaking emergence of AI in Large Language Models. The aim of this study is to place all these developments in a pragmatic broader historical social perspective without any exaggerations while at the same time without any pessimism that created the AI winter in the 1970s to 1990s. We also at the same time point out toxicity, bias, memorization, sycophancy, logical inconsistencies, hallucinations that exist just as a warning to the overly optimistic. We note here that just as this emergence of AI seems to occur at a threshold point in the number of neural connections or weights, it has also been observed that human brain and especially the cortex region is nothing special or extraordinary but simply a case of scaled-up version of the primate brain and that even the human intelligence seems like an emergent phenomena of scale.

Read more

5/20/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

A social path to human-like artificial intelligence

Edgar A. Du'e~nez-Guzm'an, Suzanne Sadedin, Jane X. Wang, Kevin R. McKee, Joel Z. Leibo

Traditionally, cognitive and computer scientists have viewed intelligence solipsistically, as a property of unitary agents devoid of social context. Given the success of contemporary learning algorithms, we argue that the bottleneck in artificial intelligence (AI) progress is shifting from data assimilation to novel data generation. We bring together evidence showing that natural intelligence emerges at multiple scales in networks of interacting agents via collective living, social relationships and major evolutionary transitions, which contribute to novel data generation through mechanisms such as population pressures, arms races, Machiavellian selection, social learning and cumulative culture. Many breakthroughs in AI exploit some of these processes, from multi-agent structures enabling algorithms to master complex games like Capture-The-Flag and StarCraft II, to strategic communication in Diplomacy and the shaping of AI data streams by other AIs. Moving beyond a solipsistic view of agency to integrate these mechanisms suggests a path to human-like compounding innovation through ongoing novel data generation.

Read more

5/28/2024

Evolving AI Collectives to Enhance Human Diversity and Enable Self-Regulation
Total Score

0

Evolving AI Collectives to Enhance Human Diversity and Enable Self-Regulation

Shiyang Lai, Yujin Potter, Junsol Kim, Richard Zhuang, Dawn Song, James Evans

Large language model behavior is shaped by the language of those with whom they interact. This capacity and their increasing prevalence online portend that they will intentionally or unintentionally program one another and form emergent AI subjectivities, relationships, and collectives. Here, we call upon the research community to investigate these societies of interacting artificial intelligences to increase their rewards and reduce their risks for human society and the health of online environments. We use a small community of models and their evolving outputs to illustrate how such emergent, decentralized AI collectives can spontaneously expand the bounds of human diversity and reduce the risk of toxic, anti-social behavior online. Finally, we discuss opportunities for AI cross-moderation and address ethical issues and design challenges associated with creating and maintaining free-formed AI collectives.

Read more

6/21/2024

Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication
Total Score

0

Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication

Hiromu Yakura, Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez, Levin Brinkmann, Ignacio Serna, Prateek Gupta, Iyad Rahwan

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents now interact with billions of humans in natural language, thanks to advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. This raises the question of whether AI has the potential to shape a fundamental aspect of human culture: the way we speak. Recent analyses revealed that scientific publications already exhibit evidence of AI-specific language. But this evidence is inconclusive, since scientists may simply be using AI to copy-edit their writing. To explore whether AI has influenced human spoken communication, we transcribed and analyzed about 280,000 English-language videos of presentations, talks, and speeches from more than 20,000 YouTube channels of academic institutions. We find a significant shift in the trend of word usage specific to words distinctively associated with ChatGPT following its release. These findings provide the first empirical evidence that humans increasingly imitate LLMs in their spoken language. Our results raise societal and policy-relevant concerns about the potential of AI to unintentionally reduce linguistic diversity, or to be deliberately misused for mass manipulation. They also highlight the need for further investigation into the feedback loops between machine behavior and human culture.

Read more

9/4/2024