Social Learning in Community Structured Graphs
2312.12186
0
0
Abstract
Traditional social learning frameworks consider environments with a homogeneous state, where each agent receives observations conditioned on that true state of nature. In this work, we relax this assumption and study the distributed hypothesis testing problem in a heterogeneous environment, where each agent can receive observations conditioned on their own personalized state of nature (or truth). We particularly focus on community structured networks, where each community admits their own true hypothesis. This scenario is common in various contexts, such as when sensors are spatially distributed, or when individuals in a social network have differing views or opinions. We show that the adaptive social learning strategy is a preferred choice for nonstationary environments, and allows each cluster to discover its own truth.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how social learning occurs in communities with structured social graphs.
- It proposes a social learning model that incorporates community structure, hypotheses testing, and adaptive learning strategies.
- The model is evaluated through simulations to understand how different factors influence the diffusion of information and the collective learning process.
Plain English Explanation
This research looks at how people in a community learn from each other when the connections between them have a specific structure, like being organized into smaller groups or "communities". The researchers developed a model that shows how people in these communities can test different ideas, adapt their learning over time, and share information with each other.
The model allows the researchers to simulate how information spreads and how the whole community learns collectively, depending on factors like how the community is structured, how individuals update their beliefs, and the dynamics of social interactions. This helps us understand better how social learning happens in real-world communities that are organized in complex ways, rather than just random networks.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a social learning model that incorporates the structure of the social network, allowing for the formation of distinct communities. Within this model, agents engage in a process of hypothesis testing, where they evaluate different beliefs or strategies and adaptively update their preferences over time.
The model simulates the diffusion of information through the social network, allowing the researchers to study how factors like the community structure, individual learning strategies, and social interaction dynamics influence the collective learning process. This provides insights into how distributed, autonomous systems and social interaction models can be used to understand complex real-world phenomena.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive model for studying social learning in communities with structured social graphs. However, the authors acknowledge that the model makes several simplifying assumptions, such as the use of a fixed community structure and the lack of consideration for external influences or exogenous events that could affect the learning process.
Additionally, the evaluation is limited to simulations, and the authors note that further empirical validation would be necessary to assess the model's applicability to real-world scenarios. There is also room for exploring more diverse learning strategies, as well as the incorporation of other social and cognitive factors that may influence individual and collective learning.
Conclusion
This research provides a valuable framework for understanding how social learning occurs in complex, community-structured networks. By modeling the interplay between individual hypothesis testing, adaptive learning, and community-level information diffusion, the authors offer insights into the collective learning dynamics of structured social systems.
The findings have implications for fields such as distributed autonomous systems, social network analysis, and collective behavior modeling, as they suggest that the structure of social connections can significantly impact how information and ideas spread within a community.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Detection of Malicious Agents in Social Learning
Valentina Shumovskaia, Mert Kayaalp, Ali H. Sayed
0
0
Non-Bayesian social learning is a framework for distributed hypothesis testing aimed at learning the true state of the environment. Traditionally, the agents are assumed to receive observations conditioned on the same true state, although it is also possible to examine the case of heterogeneous models across the graph. One important special case is when heterogeneity is caused by the presence of malicious agents whose goal is to move the agents toward a wrong hypothesis. In this work, we propose an algorithm that allows discovering the true state of every individual agent based on the sequence of their beliefs. In so doing, the methodology is also able to locate malicious behavior.
6/26/2024
A (More) Realistic Evaluation Setup for Generalisation of Community Models on Malicious Content Detection
Ivo Verhoeven, Pushkar Mishra, Rahel Beloch, Helen Yannakoudakis, Ekaterina Shutova
0
0
Community models for malicious content detection, which take into account the context from a social graph alongside the content itself, have shown remarkable performance on benchmark datasets. Yet, misinformation and hate speech continue to propagate on social media networks. This mismatch can be partially attributed to the limitations of current evaluation setups that neglect the rapid evolution of online content and the underlying social graph. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation setup for model generalisation based on our few-shot subgraph sampling approach. This setup tests for generalisation through few labelled examples in local explorations of a larger graph, emulating more realistic application settings. We show this to be a challenging inductive setup, wherein strong performance on the training graph is not indicative of performance on unseen tasks, domains, or graph structures. Lastly, we show that graph meta-learners trained with our proposed few-shot subgraph sampling outperform standard community models in the inductive setup. We make our code publicly available.
4/3/2024
New!Federated Graph Semantic and Structural Learning
Wenke Huang, Guancheng Wan, Mang Ye, Bo Du
0
0
Federated graph learning collaboratively learns a global graph neural network with distributed graphs, where the non-independent and identically distributed property is one of the major challenges. Most relative arts focus on traditional distributed tasks like images and voices, incapable of graph structures. This paper firstly reveals that local client distortion is brought by both node-level semantics and graph-level structure. First, for node-level semantics, we find that contrasting nodes from distinct classes is beneficial to provide a well-performing discrimination. We pull the local node towards the global node of the same class and push it away from the global node of different classes. Second, we postulate that a well-structural graph neural network possesses similarity for neighbors due to the inherent adjacency relationships. However, aligning each node with adjacent nodes hinders discrimination due to the potential class inconsistency. We transform the adjacency relationships into the similarity distribution and leverage the global model to distill the relation knowledge into the local model, which preserves the structural information and discriminability of the local model. Empirical results on three graph datasets manifest the superiority of the proposed method over its counterparts.
6/28/2024
Problem-Solving in Language Model Networks
Ciaran Regan, Alexandre Gournail, Mizuki Oka
0
0
To improve the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), several multi-agent approaches have been introduced. While these methods enhance performance, the application of collective intelligence-based approaches to complex network structures and the dynamics of agent interactions remain underexplored. This work extends the concept of multi-agent debate to more general network topologies, measuring the question-answering accuracy, influence, consensus, and the effects of bias on the collective. The results show that random networks perform similarly to fully connected networks despite using significantly fewer tokens. Furthermore, a strong consensus among agents in correlates with correct answers, whereas divided responses typically indicate incorrect answers. Analysing the influence of the agents reveals a balance between self-reflection and interconnectedness; self-reflection aids when local interactions are incorrect, and local interactions aid when the agent itself is incorrect. Additionally, bias plays a strong role in system performance with correctly biased hub nodes boosting performance. These insights suggest that using random networks or scale-free networks with knowledgeable agents placed in central positions can enhance the overall performance of multi-agent systems.
6/19/2024