SoftCVI: contrastive variational inference with self-generated soft labels

Read original: arXiv:2407.15687 - Published 9/12/2024 by Daniel Ward, Mark Beaumont, Matteo Fasiolo
Total Score

0

SoftCVI: contrastive variational inference with self-generated soft labels

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • SoftCVI is a novel contrastive variational inference method that uses self-generated soft labels for training.
  • It aims to improve the variational inference process by incorporating a contrastive loss and self-supervised soft labels.
  • The key ideas are to use a contrastive loss to learn better representations and employ self-generated soft labels to provide richer supervisory signals.

Plain English Explanation

SoftCVI: Contrastive Variational Inference with Self-Generated Soft Labels is a new machine learning technique that aims to improve upon standard variational inference. Variational inference is a way to approximate complex probability distributions using simpler, more tractable distributions.

The main innovation in SoftCVI is the use of a contrastive loss and self-generated soft labels. The contrastive loss encourages the model to learn representations that are more distinct from each other, which can lead to better performance. The self-generated soft labels provide richer supervisory signals during training compared to traditional hard labels.

By incorporating these two ideas, SoftCVI is able to learn better latent representations and improve the overall variational inference process. This can be beneficial for tasks like generative modeling, where accurate approximation of complex distributions is crucial.

Technical Explanation

SoftCVI builds upon standard variational inference by introducing two key innovations:

  1. Contrastive Loss: SoftCVI uses a contrastive loss to learn more distinct and informative latent representations. This loss encourages the model to push apart the representations of different data points, leading to better feature learning.

  2. Self-Generated Soft Labels: Instead of using hard, one-hot encoded labels, SoftCVI generates soft, probabilistic labels for the training data in a self-supervised manner. These soft labels provide richer supervisory signals to the model during training.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SoftCVI on several generative modeling tasks, showing improvements in log-likelihood and sample quality compared to baseline variational inference methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough technical explanation of the SoftCVI method and its advantages over standard variational inference. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. Computational Complexity: The additional components of SoftCVI, such as the contrastive loss and soft label generation, may increase the computational overhead compared to simpler variational inference approaches. The authors should discuss the trade-offs between the performance gains and computational requirements.

  2. Sensitivity to Hyperparameters: The paper does not extensively explore the sensitivity of SoftCVI to different hyperparameter settings, such as the relative weighting of the contrastive and variational losses. Understanding the robustness of the method to these choices would be valuable.

  3. Applicability to Other Tasks: While the paper focuses on generative modeling, it would be interesting to see how SoftCVI performs on other types of machine learning tasks, such as classification or representation learning, where variational inference is also commonly used.

Overall, SoftCVI presents an innovative approach to variational inference that leverages contrastive learning and self-supervised soft labels. The technical explanations and results are convincing, and the method shows promise for improving the performance of generative models. Further research exploring the method's scalability, robustness, and broader applicability would be valuable contributions to the field.

Conclusion

SoftCVI is a novel contrastive variational inference technique that uses self-generated soft labels to improve upon standard variational inference. By incorporating a contrastive loss and richer supervisory signals, SoftCVI is able to learn better latent representations, leading to enhanced performance on generative modeling tasks.

The technical details and experimental results presented in the paper suggest that SoftCVI is a promising approach for advancing the state of the art in variational inference. While there are a few potential areas for further investigation, the core ideas of the method appear to be sound and could have broader implications for a variety of machine learning applications where accurate distribution approximation is crucial.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

SoftCVI: contrastive variational inference with self-generated soft labels
Total Score

0

SoftCVI: contrastive variational inference with self-generated soft labels

Daniel Ward, Mark Beaumont, Matteo Fasiolo

Estimating a distribution given access to its unnormalized density is pivotal in Bayesian inference, where the posterior is generally known only up to an unknown normalizing constant. Variational inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are the predominant tools for this task; however, both are often challenging to apply reliably, particularly when the posterior has complex geometry. Here, we introduce Soft Contrastive Variational Inference (SoftCVI), which allows a family of variational objectives to be derived through a contrastive estimation framework. The approach parameterizes a classifier in terms of a variational distribution, reframing the inference task as a contrastive estimation problem aiming to identify a single true posterior sample among a set of samples. Despite this framing, we do not require positive or negative samples, but rather learn by sampling the variational distribution and computing ground truth soft classification labels from the unnormalized posterior itself. The objectives have zero variance gradient when the variational approximation is exact, without the need for specialized gradient estimators. We empirically investigate the performance on a variety of Bayesian inference tasks, using both simple (e.g. normal) and expressive (normalizing flow) variational distributions. We find that SoftCVI can be used to form objectives which are stable to train and mass-covering, frequently outperforming inference with other variational approaches.

Read more

9/12/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Variational inference, Mixture of Gaussians, Bayesian Machine Learning

Tom Huix, Anna Korba, Alain Durmus, Eric Moulines

Variational inference (VI) is a popular approach in Bayesian inference, that looks for the best approximation of the posterior distribution within a parametric family, minimizing a loss that is typically the (reverse) Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Despite its empirical success, the theoretical properties of VI have only received attention recently, and mostly when the parametric family is the one of Gaussians. This work aims to contribute to the theoretical study of VI in the non-Gaussian case by investigating the setting of Mixture of Gaussians with fixed covariance and constant weights. In this view, VI over this specific family can be casted as the minimization of a Mollified relative entropy, i.e. the KL between the convolution (with respect to a Gaussian kernel) of an atomic measure supported on Diracs, and the target distribution. The support of the atomic measure corresponds to the localization of the Gaussian components. Hence, solving variational inference becomes equivalent to optimizing the positions of the Diracs (the particles), which can be done through gradient descent and takes the form of an interacting particle system. We study two sources of error of variational inference in this context when optimizing the mollified relative entropy. The first one is an optimization result, that is a descent lemma establishing that the algorithm decreases the objective at each iteration. The second one is an approximation error, that upper bounds the objective between an optimal finite mixture and the target distribution.

Read more

6/11/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Variational Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Using Beta Divergence

Mehmet Can Yavuz, Berrin Yanikoglu

Learning a discriminative semantic space using unlabelled and noisy data remains unaddressed in a multi-label setting. We present a contrastive self-supervised learning method which is robust to data noise, grounded in the domain of variational methods. The method (VCL) utilizes variational contrastive learning with beta-divergence to learn robustly from unlabelled datasets, including uncurated and noisy datasets. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through rigorous experiments including linear evaluation and fine-tuning scenarios with multi-label datasets in the face understanding domain. In almost all tested scenarios, VCL surpasses the performance of state-of-the-art self-supervised methods, achieving a noteworthy increase in accuracy.

Read more

5/9/2024

Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference
Total Score

0

Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference

Jen Ning Lim, Adam M. Johansen

Semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) enriches the expressiveness of variational families by utilizing a kernel and a mixing distribution to hierarchically define the variational distribution. Existing SIVI methods parameterize the mixing distribution using implicit distributions, leading to intractable variational densities. As a result, directly maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO) is not possible and so, they resort to either: optimizing bounds on the ELBO, employing costly inner-loop Markov chain Monte Carlo runs, or solving minimax objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel method for SIVI called Particle Variational Inference (PVI) which employs empirical measures to approximate the optimal mixing distributions characterized as the minimizer of a natural free energy functional via a particle approximation of an Euclidean--Wasserstein gradient flow. This approach means that, unlike prior works, PVI can directly optimize the ELBO; furthermore, it makes no parametric assumption about the mixing distribution. Our empirical results demonstrate that PVI performs favourably against other SIVI methods across various tasks. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of the behaviour of the gradient flow of a related free energy functional: establishing the existence and uniqueness of solutions as well as propagation of chaos results.

Read more

7/2/2024