SoK: Challenges and Opportunities in Federated Unlearning
2403.02437
0
0
ā
Abstract
Federated learning (FL), introduced in 2017, facilitates collaborative learning between non-trusting parties with no need for the parties to explicitly share their data among themselves. This allows training models on user data while respecting privacy regulations such as GDPR and CPRA. However, emerging privacy requirements may mandate model owners to be able to emph{forget} some learned data, e.g., when requested by data owners or law enforcement. This has given birth to an active field of research called emph{machine unlearning}. In the context of FL, many techniques developed for unlearning in centralized settings are not trivially applicable! This is due to the unique differences between centralized and distributed learning, in particular, interactivity, stochasticity, heterogeneity, and limited accessibility in FL. In response, a recent line of work has focused on developing unlearning mechanisms tailored to FL. This SoK paper aims to take a deep look at the emph{federated unlearning} literature, with the goal of identifying research trends and challenges in this emerging field. By carefully categorizing papers published on FL unlearning (since 2020), we aim to pinpoint the unique complexities of federated unlearning, highlighting limitations on directly applying centralized unlearning methods. We compare existing federated unlearning methods regarding influence removal and performance recovery, compare their threat models and assumptions, and discuss their implications and limitations. For instance, we analyze the experimental setup of FL unlearning studies from various perspectives, including data heterogeneity and its simulation, the datasets used for demonstration, and evaluation metrics. Our work aims to offer insights and suggestions for future research on federated unlearning.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Federated learning (FL) allows multiple parties to collaboratively train machine learning models without sharing their private data.
- However, new privacy regulations may require the ability to "forget" or unlearn some of the data used in model training.
- Developing techniques for "federated unlearning" is an emerging area of research, as the unique challenges of federated learning make it difficult to directly apply unlearning methods from centralized settings.
Plain English Explanation
Federated learning is a way for different organizations or individuals to work together to train machine learning models without having to share their private data with each other. This is useful for protecting people's privacy.
However, new privacy laws may now require the ability to "forget" or "unlearn" some of the data that was used to train these models, for example, if a person requests that their data be removed. Developing techniques for doing this in a federated learning setting, known as "federated unlearning", is an active area of research.
Centralized unlearning methods don't work as well in federated learning because of the unique challenges of this distributed approach, such as the back-and-forth communication between participants, the randomness involved, and the differences in the data held by each participant. Researchers are now working on new unlearning methods specifically designed for federated learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive survey of the emerging field of federated unlearning. It categorizes and analyzes the various techniques that have been developed to enable forgetting or unlearning of data in the context of federated learning.
The authors highlight the unique challenges of federated unlearning compared to centralized unlearning, such as the need to coordinate unlearning across multiple participants, the difficulty of controlling the stochastic training process, and the heterogeneity of data across participants.
The paper examines existing federated unlearning methods in terms of their ability to remove the influence of data and recover model performance after unlearning. It also compares the threat models and assumptions made by these methods.
Additionally, the authors analyze the experimental setups used in federated unlearning studies, looking at factors like data heterogeneity, datasets, and evaluation metrics. This provides insights into the current state of research and directions for future work in this emerging field of machine unlearning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-structured overview of the federated unlearning landscape, highlighting the unique challenges that arise in this distributed setting compared to centralized unlearning.
One limitation noted is the difficulty of directly applying centralized unlearning techniques to federated learning due to the inherent differences in the learning process. The authors emphasize the need for new unlearning methods tailored specifically to the federated learning context.
While the paper covers a broad range of existing federated unlearning techniques, it does not provide a comprehensive comparison or evaluation of their relative strengths and weaknesses. Additional research may be needed to further understand the trade-offs and suitability of different approaches for various use cases.
Furthermore, the paper acknowledges that the experimental setups used in the reviewed studies may not fully capture the complexities of real-world federated learning scenarios, such as the dynamic nature of participant data and the potential for adversarial attacks. Exploring these more realistic settings could be an area for future investigation.
Conclusion
This survey paper provides a valuable overview of the emerging field of federated unlearning, highlighting the unique challenges and the ongoing research efforts to address them. By categorizing and analyzing the existing techniques, the authors offer insights that can guide future research and the development of more advanced unlearning mechanisms for federated learning.
As privacy regulations continue to evolve and the adoption of federated learning increases, the ability to effectively "forget" or unlearn data will become increasingly crucial. The findings and recommendations presented in this paper can help shape the direction of this important research area and contribute to the broader goal of developing privacy-preserving machine learning techniques.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Federated Learning driven Large Language Models for Swarm Intelligence: A Survey
Youyang Qu
0
0
Federated learning (FL) offers a compelling framework for training large language models (LLMs) while addressing data privacy and decentralization challenges. This paper surveys recent advancements in the federated learning of large language models, with a particular focus on machine unlearning, a crucial aspect for complying with privacy regulations like the Right to be Forgotten. Machine unlearning in the context of federated LLMs involves systematically and securely removing individual data contributions from the learned model without retraining from scratch. We explore various strategies that enable effective unlearning, such as perturbation techniques, model decomposition, and incremental learning, highlighting their implications for maintaining model performance and data privacy. Furthermore, we examine case studies and experimental results from recent literature to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of these approaches in real-world scenarios. Our survey reveals a growing interest in developing more robust and scalable federated unlearning methods, suggesting a vital area for future research in the intersection of AI ethics and distributed machine learning technologies.
6/17/2024
š§Ŗ
Towards Federated Domain Unlearning: Verification Methodologies and Challenges
Kahou Tam, Kewei Xu, Li Li, Huazhu Fu
0
0
Federated Learning (FL) has evolved as a powerful tool for collaborative model training across multiple entities, ensuring data privacy in sensitive sectors such as healthcare and finance. However, the introduction of the Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF) poses new challenges, necessitating federated unlearning to delete data without full model retraining. Traditional FL unlearning methods, not originally designed with domain specificity in mind, inadequately address the complexities of multi-domain scenarios, often affecting the accuracy of models in non-targeted domains or leading to uniform forgetting across all domains. Our work presents the first comprehensive empirical study on Federated Domain Unlearning, analyzing the characteristics and challenges of current techniques in multi-domain contexts. We uncover that these methods falter, particularly because they neglect the nuanced influences of domain-specific data, which can lead to significant performance degradation and inaccurate model behavior. Our findings reveal that unlearning disproportionately affects the model's deeper layers, erasing critical representational subspaces acquired during earlier training phases. In response, we propose novel evaluation methodologies tailored for Federated Domain Unlearning, aiming to accurately assess and verify domain-specific data erasure without compromising the model's overall integrity and performance. This investigation not only highlights the urgent need for domain-centric unlearning strategies in FL but also sets a new precedent for evaluating and implementing these techniques effectively.
6/6/2024
š
Unlearning during Learning: An Efficient Federated Machine Unlearning Method
Hanlin Gu, Gongxi Zhu, Jie Zhang, Xinyuan Zhao, Yuxing Han, Lixin Fan, Qiang Yang
0
0
In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has garnered significant attention as a distributed machine learning paradigm. To facilitate the implementation of the right to be forgotten, the concept of federated machine unlearning (FMU) has also emerged. However, current FMU approaches often involve additional time-consuming steps and may not offer comprehensive unlearning capabilities, which renders them less practical in real FL scenarios. In this paper, we introduce FedAU, an innovative and efficient FMU framework aimed at overcoming these limitations. Specifically, FedAU incorporates a lightweight auxiliary unlearning module into the learning process and employs a straightforward linear operation to facilitate unlearning. This approach eliminates the requirement for extra time-consuming steps, rendering it well-suited for FL. Furthermore, FedAU exhibits remarkable versatility. It not only enables multiple clients to carry out unlearning tasks concurrently but also supports unlearning at various levels of granularity, including individual data samples, specific classes, and even at the client level. We conducted extensive experiments on MNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 datasets to evaluate the performance of FedAU. The results demonstrate that FedAU effectively achieves the desired unlearning effect while maintaining model accuracy.
5/27/2024
Update Selective Parameters: Federated Machine Unlearning Based on Model Explanation
Heng Xu, Tianqing Zhu, Lefeng Zhang, Wanlei Zhou, Philip S. Yu
0
0
Federated learning is a promising privacy-preserving paradigm for distributed machine learning. In this context, there is sometimes a need for a specialized process called machine unlearning, which is required when the effect of some specific training samples needs to be removed from a learning model due to privacy, security, usability, and/or legislative factors. However, problems arise when current centralized unlearning methods are applied to existing federated learning, in which the server aims to remove all information about a class from the global model. Centralized unlearning usually focuses on simple models or is premised on the ability to access all training data at a central node. However, training data cannot be accessed on the server under the federated learning paradigm, conflicting with the requirements of the centralized unlearning process. Additionally, there are high computation and communication costs associated with accessing clients' data, especially in scenarios involving numerous clients or complex global models. To address these concerns, we propose a more effective and efficient federated unlearning scheme based on the concept of model explanation. Model explanation involves understanding deep networks and individual channel importance, so that this understanding can be used to determine which model channels are critical for classes that need to be unlearned. We select the most influential channels within an already-trained model for the data that need to be unlearned and fine-tune only influential channels to remove the contribution made by those data. In this way, we can simultaneously avoid huge consumption costs and ensure that the unlearned model maintains good performance. Experiments with different training models on various datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
6/19/2024