SoK: On the Semantic AI Security in Autonomous Driving
2203.05314
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Autonomous Driving (AD) systems rely on AI components to make safety and correct driving decisions. Unfortunately, today's AI algorithms are known to be generally vulnerable to adversarial attacks. However, for such AI component-level vulnerabilities to be semantically impactful at the system level, it needs to address non-trivial semantic gaps both (1) from the system-level attack input spaces to those at AI component level, and (2) from AI component-level attack impacts to those at the system level. In this paper, we define such research space as semantic AI security as opposed to generic AI security. Over the past 5 years, increasingly more research works are performed to tackle such semantic AI security challenges in AD context, which has started to show an exponential growth trend. In this paper, we perform the first systematization of knowledge of such growing semantic AD AI security research space. In total, we collect and analyze 53 such papers, and systematically taxonomize them based on research aspects critical for the security field. We summarize 6 most substantial scientific gaps observed based on quantitative comparisons both vertically among existing AD AI security works and horizontally with security works from closely-related domains. With these, we are able to provide insights and potential future directions not only at the design level, but also at the research goal, methodology, and community levels. To address the most critical scientific methodology-level gap, we take the initiative to develop an open-source, uniform, and extensible system-driven evaluation platform, named PASS, for the semantic AD AI security research community. We also use our implemented platform prototype to showcase the capabilities and benefits of such a platform using representative semantic AD AI attacks.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper discusses the problem of semantic AI security in the context of autonomous driving (AD) systems.
- Autonomous driving systems rely on AI components for safety and driving decisions, but these AI algorithms are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks.
- For these AI vulnerabilities to have a meaningful impact at the system level, there must be a "semantic gap" between the attack input space and the AI component, as well as between the AI component-level attack and the system-level impact.
- The authors define this research space as "semantic AI security," in contrast with generic AI security.
- Over the past 5 years, there has been a growing body of research on semantic AD AI security, with an exponential trend.
Plain English Explanation
Autonomous vehicles use artificial intelligence (AI) to make important decisions about driving safety and performance. However, these AI systems are known to have vulnerabilities that can be exploited through "adversarial attacks." For these AI vulnerabilities to actually cause problems for the overall autonomous vehicle system, there needs to be a "semantic gap" - a disconnect between the attack input and what the AI system sees, and also between the AI system's response to the attack and the real-world impact on the vehicle.
The authors of this paper call this area of research "semantic AI security," to distinguish it from more generic AI security. Over the past 5 years, there has been a rapidly growing body of research focused on this semantic AI security challenge in the context of autonomous driving systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the first systematic review of the growing body of research on semantic AI security for autonomous driving systems. The authors collected and analyzed 53 research papers in this area. They taxonomized the papers based on critical aspects for the security research field.
Through their analysis, the authors identified 6 key scientific gaps in the existing research. These gaps span the design, research goals, methodology, and research community aspects of this field. To address the most critical methodology-level gap, the authors developed an open-source, uniform, and extensible system-driven evaluation platform called PASS. They used this platform to showcase representative semantic AD AI attacks and demonstrate its capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging field of semantic AI security for autonomous driving systems. By identifying the key scientific gaps in this research space, the authors highlight important areas for future work. The development of the PASS evaluation platform is a valuable contribution that can help standardize and advance research in this domain.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations or caveats of the existing research or the PASS platform itself. There may be challenges in fully capturing the complexity of real-world autonomous driving scenarios within a standardized evaluation framework. Additionally, the impact and practical implications of the identified semantic AI vulnerabilities on actual autonomous vehicle deployments are not fully explored.
Further research is needed to understand the severity and prevalence of these semantic AI security threats, as well as to develop robust and scalable mitigation strategies. Engaging the broader autonomous driving research and development community will be crucial to addressing these challenges and building trustworthy AI systems for autonomous vehicles.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable systematic review of the emerging field of semantic AI security for autonomous driving systems. By identifying key research gaps and developing a standardized evaluation platform, the authors have made significant contributions to advancing this important area of study. As autonomous driving technology continues to evolve, addressing the semantic AI security challenges highlighted in this paper will be crucial for ensuring the safety and reliability of self-driving vehicles and facilitating the development of trustworthy AI systems in this domain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Redefining Safety for Autonomous Vehicles
Philip Koopman, William Widen
0
0
Existing definitions and associated conceptual frameworks for computer-based system safety should be revisited in light of real-world experiences from deploying autonomous vehicles. Current terminology used by industry safety standards emphasizes mitigation of risk from specifically identified hazards, and carries assumptions based on human-supervised vehicle operation. Operation without a human driver dramatically increases the scope of safety concerns, especially due to operation in an open world environment, a requirement to self-enforce operational limits, participation in an ad hoc sociotechnical system of systems, and a requirement to conform to both legal and ethical constraints. Existing standards and terminology only partially address these new challenges. We propose updated definitions for core system safety concepts that encompass these additional considerations as a starting point for evolving safe-ty approaches to address these additional safety challenges. These results might additionally inform framing safety terminology for other autonomous system applications.
4/29/2024
Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems
David davidad Dalrymple, Joar Skalse, Yoshua Bengio, Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Sanjit Seshia, Steve Omohundro, Christian Szegedy, Ben Goldhaber, Nora Ammann, Alessandro Abate, Joe Halpern, Clark Barrett, Ding Zhao, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Jeannette Wing, Joshua Tenenbaum
0
0
Ensuring that AI systems reliably and robustly avoid harmful or dangerous behaviours is a crucial challenge, especially for AI systems with a high degree of autonomy and general intelligence, or systems used in safety-critical contexts. In this paper, we will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. This is achieved by the interplay of three core components: a world model (which provides a mathematical description of how the AI system affects the outside world), a safety specification (which is a mathematical description of what effects are acceptable), and a verifier (which provides an auditable proof certificate that the AI satisfies the safety specification relative to the world model). We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them. We also argue for the necessity of this approach to AI safety, and for the inadequacy of the main alternative approaches.
5/13/2024
Dynamic Adversarial Attacks on Autonomous Driving Systems
Amirhosein Chahe, Chenan Wang, Abhishek Jeyapratap, Kaidi Xu, Lifeng Zhou
0
0
This paper introduces an attacking mechanism to challenge the resilience of autonomous driving systems. Specifically, we manipulate the decision-making processes of an autonomous vehicle by dynamically displaying adversarial patches on a screen mounted on another moving vehicle. These patches are optimized to deceive the object detection models into misclassifying targeted objects, e.g., traffic signs. Such manipulation has significant implications for critical multi-vehicle interactions such as intersection crossing and lane changing, which are vital for safe and efficient autonomous driving systems. Particularly, we make four major contributions. First, we introduce a novel adversarial attack approach where the patch is not co-located with its target, enabling more versatile and stealthy attacks. Moreover, our method utilizes dynamic patches displayed on a screen, allowing for adaptive changes and movement, enhancing the flexibility and performance of the attack. To do so, we design a Screen Image Transformation Network (SIT-Net), which simulates environmental effects on the displayed images, narrowing the gap between simulated and real-world scenarios. Further, we integrate a positional loss term into the adversarial training process to increase the success rate of the dynamic attack. Finally, we shift the focus from merely attacking perceptual systems to influencing the decision-making algorithms of self-driving systems. Our experiments demonstrate the first successful implementation of such dynamic adversarial attacks in real-world autonomous driving scenarios, paving the way for advancements in the field of robust and secure autonomous driving.
5/16/2024
💬
A Survey on Semantic Communication Networks: Architecture, Security, and Privacy
Shaolong Guo, Yuntao Wang, Ning Zhang, Zhou Su, Tom H. Luan, Zhiyi Tian, Xuemin Shen
0
0
Semantic communication, emerging as a breakthrough beyond the classical Shannon paradigm, aims to convey the essential meaning of source data rather than merely focusing on precise yet content-agnostic bit transmission. By interconnecting diverse intelligent agents (e.g., autonomous vehicles and VR devices) via semantic communications, the semantic communication networks (SemComNet) supports semantic-oriented transmission, efficient spectrum utilization, and flexible networking among collaborative agents. Consequently, SemComNet stands out for enabling ever-increasing intelligent applications, such as autonomous driving and Metaverse. However, being built on a variety of cutting-edge technologies including AI and knowledge graphs, SemComNet introduces diverse brand-new and unexpected threats, which pose obstacles to its widespread development. Besides, due to the intrinsic characteristics of SemComNet in terms of heterogeneous components, autonomous intelligence, and large-scale structure, a series of critical challenges emerge in securing SemComNet. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date survey of SemComNet from its fundamentals, security, and privacy aspects. Specifically, we first introduce a novel three-layer architecture of SemComNet for multi-agent interaction, which comprises the control layer, semantic transmission layer, and cognitive sensing layer. Then, we discuss its working modes and enabling technologies. Afterward, based on the layered architecture of SemComNet, we outline a taxonomy of security and privacy threats, while discussing state-of-the-art defense approaches. Finally, we present future research directions, clarifying the path toward building intelligent, robust, and green SemComNet. To our knowledge, this survey is the first to comprehensively cover the fundamentals of SemComNet, alongside a detailed analysis of its security and privacy issues.
5/3/2024