Space-time deterministic graph rewriting

Read original: arXiv:2404.05838 - Published 4/10/2024 by Pablo Arrighi, Marin Costes, Gilles Dowek, Luidnel Maignan
Total Score

0

Space-time deterministic graph rewriting

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a framework for modeling the dynamics of causal graphs using space-time deterministic graph rewriting.
  • The framework allows for the modeling of complex systems like cellular automata, where the state of a cell depends on the states of its neighbors.
  • The paper explores the mathematical properties of this framework, including time covariance, strong confluence, and the relationship to distributed computation and task dependencies.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a way to model the behavior of complex systems, like cellular automata, using a technique called "space-time deterministic graph rewriting." Cellular automata are a type of system where the state of each "cell" is determined by the states of the cells around it, like a grid of squares where each square's color changes based on the colors of the squares next to it.

The researchers' framework allows them to represent these systems as a graph, where the cells are nodes and the relationships between them are edges. By defining a set of "local rules" that govern how the graph can change over time, the researchers can simulate the dynamic behavior of the system. This approach offers a mathematical way to analyze properties of these systems, such as how the changes in one part of the graph can affect other parts, and how the overall system behaves over time.

The paper explores some of the key mathematical properties of this framework, including how the changes in the graph can be coordinated across different parts of the system (time covariance), how the system can reach a stable state (strong confluence), and how the framework relates to the concept of distributed computation, where different parts of a system work together to accomplish a task.

Technical Explanation

The researchers present a framework for modeling the dynamics of causal graphs using space-time deterministic graph rewriting. This approach allows for the modeling of complex systems, such as cellular automata, where the state of a cell depends on the states of its neighbors.

The key elements of the framework include:

  1. Graphs and local rules: The system is represented as a graph, where nodes correspond to cells or components, and edges represent the relationships between them. The dynamics of the system are governed by a set of "local rules" that specify how the graph can be rewritten or transformed over time.

  2. Time covariance: The framework ensures that the changes made to the graph are "time covariant," meaning that the order in which changes are applied does not affect the final outcome. This property is important for modeling systems that evolve in a distributed or decentralized manner.

  3. Strong confluence: The researchers show that the graph rewriting system exhibits "strong confluence," which means that the system will converge to a unique final state, regardless of the order in which the local rules are applied. This property is crucial for ensuring the predictability and stability of the modeled systems.

  4. Relationship to distributed computation: The framework's connection to distributed computation and task dependencies is explored, where the graph rewriting system can be interpreted as a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of tasks that must be executed in a specific order to reach the final state.

The researchers demonstrate the applicability of their framework through a particle system example, where the dynamic behavior of a collection of interacting particles is modeled using space-time deterministic graph rewriting.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have presented a novel and mathematically rigorous framework for modeling the dynamics of causal graphs. The framework's properties, such as time covariance and strong confluence, are valuable for the analysis and simulation of complex systems, as they ensure the predictability and stability of the modeled behavior.

However, the paper does not address the computational complexity of the graph rewriting system, which could be a potential limitation when dealing with large-scale or highly interconnected systems. Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that the framework is limited to deterministic systems, leaving open the question of how to extend the approach to handle stochastic or non-deterministic phenomena.

Further research could explore the application of this framework to a wider range of real-world systems, such as distributed quantum computing or network optimization problems. Investigating the scalability and performance of the graph rewriting system would also be a valuable area of study.

Conclusion

The researchers have developed a powerful framework for modeling the dynamics of causal graphs using space-time deterministic graph rewriting. This approach offers a rigorous mathematical foundation for understanding the behavior of complex systems, such as cellular automata, and their relationship to distributed computation and task dependencies.

The framework's properties of time covariance and strong confluence ensure the predictability and stability of the modeled systems, making it a valuable tool for the analysis and simulation of a wide range of real-world phenomena. While the current work is limited to deterministic systems, further research could explore extensions to handle stochastic and non-deterministic scenarios, as well as investigate the scalability and performance of the graph rewriting system.

Overall, this paper introduces an important new perspective on the modeling of complex systems, with potential applications in fields ranging from distributed computing to network optimization and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Space-time deterministic graph rewriting
Total Score

0

Space-time deterministic graph rewriting

Pablo Arrighi, Marin Costes, Gilles Dowek, Luidnel Maignan

We study non-terminating graph rewriting models, whose local rules are applied non-deterministically -- and yet enjoy a strong form of determinism, namely space-time determinism. Of course in the case of terminating computation it is well-known that the mess introduced by asynchronous rule applications may not matter to the end result, as confluence conspires to produce a unique normal form. In the context of non-terminating computation however, confluence is a very weak property, and (almost) synchronous rule applications is always preferred e.g. when it comes to simulating dynamical systems. Here we provide sufficient conditions so that asynchronous local rule applications conspire to produce well-determined events in the space-time unfolding of the graph, regardless of their application orders. Our first example is an asynchronous simulation of a dynamical system. Our second example features time dilation, in the spirit of general relativity.

Read more

4/10/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Queuing dynamics of asynchronous Federated Learning

Louis Leconte, Matthieu Jonckheere, Sergey Samsonov, Eric Moulines

We study asynchronous federated learning mechanisms with nodes having potentially different computational speeds. In such an environment, each node is allowed to work on models with potential delays and contribute to updates to the central server at its own pace. Existing analyses of such algorithms typically depend on intractable quantities such as the maximum node delay and do not consider the underlying queuing dynamics of the system. In this paper, we propose a non-uniform sampling scheme for the central server that allows for lower delays with better complexity, taking into account the closed Jackson network structure of the associated computational graph. Our experiments clearly show a significant improvement of our method over current state-of-the-art asynchronous algorithms on an image classification problem.

Read more

5/2/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Unifying Partial Synchrony

Andrei Constantinescu, Diana Ghinea, Jakub Sliwinski, Roger Wattenhofer

The distributed computing literature considers multiple options for modeling communication. Most simply, communication is categorized as either synchronous or asynchronous. Synchronous communication assumes that messages get delivered within a publicly known timeframe and that parties' clocks are synchronized. Asynchronous communication, on the other hand, only assumes that messages get delivered eventually. A more nuanced approach, or a middle ground between the two extremes, is given by the partially synchronous model, which is arguably the most realistic option. This model comes in two commonly considered flavors: (i) The Global Stabilization Time (GST) model: after an (unknown) amount of time, the network becomes synchronous. This captures scenarios where network issues are transient. (ii) The Unknown Latency (UL) model: the network is, in fact, synchronous, but the message delay bound is unknown. This work formally establishes that any time-agnostic property that can be achieved by a protocol in the UL model can also be achieved by a (possibly different) protocol in the GST model. By time-agnostic, we mean properties that can depend on the order in which events happen but not on time as measured by the parties. Most properties considered in distributed computing are time-agnostic. The converse was already known, even without the time-agnostic requirement, so our result shows that the two network conditions are, under one sensible assumption, equally demanding.

Read more

5/17/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Nondeterministic Causal Models

Sander Beckers

We generalize acyclic deterministic structural equation models to the nondeterministic case and argue that it offers an improved semantics for counterfactuals. The standard, deterministic, semantics developed by Halpern (and based on the initial proposal of Galles & Pearl) assumes that for each assignment of values to parent variables there is a unique assignment to their child variable, and it assumes that the actual world (an assignment of values to all variables of a model) specifies a unique counterfactual world for each intervention. Both assumptions are unrealistic, and therefore we drop both of them in our proposal. We do so by allowing multi-valued functions in the structural equations. In addition, we adjust the semantics so that the solutions to the equations that obtained in the actual world are preserved in any counterfactual world. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the resulting logic and compare it to the standard one by Halpern and to more recent proposals that are closer to ours. Finally, we extend our models to the probabilistic case and show that they open up the way to identifying counterfactuals even in Causal Bayesian Networks.

Read more

8/27/2024