Unifying Partial Synchrony

Read original: arXiv:2405.10249 - Published 5/17/2024 by Andrei Constantinescu, Diana Ghinea, Jakub Sliwinski, Roger Wattenhofer
Total Score

0

🤔

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Unifies different models of partial synchrony in distributed systems
  • Introduces the Global Stabilization Time (GST) model as a general framework
  • Demonstrates how various synchrony models can be expressed using the GST model
  • Provides a unified analysis of the impact of partial synchrony on the complexity of solving distributed problems

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach to understanding the concept of "partial synchrony" in distributed systems. Partial synchrony refers to the idea that, while a distributed system may not be perfectly synchronized, there are still some guarantees about the timing and ordering of events. This is in contrast to the completely asynchronous case, where there are no timing guarantees at all, and the completely synchronous case, where all processes are perfectly aligned.

The researchers introduce the Global Stabilization Time (GST) model, which provides a general framework for capturing different synchrony models. They show how various existing models, such as scale-robust timely asynchronous decentralized learning, synchronous consensus under partial synchrony, and queuing dynamics in asynchronous federated learning, can be expressed using the GST model. This allows for a unified analysis of the impact of partial synchrony on the complexity of solving distributed problems.

By providing a common framework, the researchers aim to simplify the understanding and comparison of different synchrony models, and to help researchers and practitioners in the field of distributed systems to better navigate the trade-offs and design choices involved in building reliable and efficient distributed applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the Global Stabilization Time (GST) model as a general framework for capturing different notions of partial synchrony in distributed systems. The GST model assumes that there exists a (possibly unknown) time, called the Global Stabilization Time (GST), after which the system exhibits some form of synchrony.

The researchers show how various existing models of partial synchrony, such as scale-robust timely asynchronous decentralized learning, synchronous consensus under partial synchrony, and queuing dynamics in asynchronous federated learning, can be expressed using the GST model. This allows for a unified analysis of the impact of partial synchrony on the complexity of solving distributed problems.

The paper provides a detailed technical discussion of the GST model and its relationship to other synchrony models, as well as an analysis of the complexity of solving various distributed problems under the GST model. The researchers demonstrate how the GST model can be used to derive tight bounds on the complexity of solving these problems, which can help guide the design of efficient distributed algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and comprehensive framework for understanding partial synchrony in distributed systems. The introduction of the GST model as a unifying concept is a significant contribution, as it allows researchers and practitioners to reason about a wide range of synchrony models using a common set of tools and analysis techniques.

One potential limitation of the research is that the GST model, while general, may still not capture all the nuances and complexities of real-world distributed systems. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that the GST model may be further extended or refined to address additional use cases and scenarios.

Additionally, while the paper provides a detailed technical analysis of the complexity of solving various distributed problems under the GST model, it would be valuable to see more empirical validation of the model's practical applicability and performance. Comparative studies with real-world distributed systems could help to further validate the model and identify any potential gaps or areas for improvement.

Overall, the paper represents a significant contribution to the field of distributed systems, and the GST model is likely to become an important tool for researchers and practitioners working in this domain.

Conclusion

The paper presents a unifying framework for understanding partial synchrony in distributed systems, introducing the Global Stabilization Time (GST) model. This model provides a general way to capture different notions of partial synchrony, allowing researchers to analyze the impact of partial synchrony on the complexity of solving distributed problems.

By demonstrating how various existing synchrony models can be expressed using the GST model, the paper simplifies the understanding and comparison of these models, and helps to guide the design of efficient distributed algorithms. The technical analysis provided in the paper offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in the field of distributed systems, and the GST model is likely to become an important tool for this community.

Overall, the paper represents a significant advancement in the understanding and management of partial synchrony in distributed systems, with the potential to have a lasting impact on the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Total Score

0

Unifying Partial Synchrony

Andrei Constantinescu, Diana Ghinea, Jakub Sliwinski, Roger Wattenhofer

The distributed computing literature considers multiple options for modeling communication. Most simply, communication is categorized as either synchronous or asynchronous. Synchronous communication assumes that messages get delivered within a publicly known timeframe and that parties' clocks are synchronized. Asynchronous communication, on the other hand, only assumes that messages get delivered eventually. A more nuanced approach, or a middle ground between the two extremes, is given by the partially synchronous model, which is arguably the most realistic option. This model comes in two commonly considered flavors: (i) The Global Stabilization Time (GST) model: after an (unknown) amount of time, the network becomes synchronous. This captures scenarios where network issues are transient. (ii) The Unknown Latency (UL) model: the network is, in fact, synchronous, but the message delay bound is unknown. This work formally establishes that any time-agnostic property that can be achieved by a protocol in the UL model can also be achieved by a (possibly different) protocol in the GST model. By time-agnostic, we mean properties that can depend on the order in which events happen but not on time as measured by the parties. Most properties considered in distributed computing are time-agnostic. The converse was already known, even without the time-agnostic requirement, so our result shows that the two network conditions are, under one sensible assumption, equally demanding.

Read more

5/17/2024

Granular Synchrony
Total Score

0

Granular Synchrony

Neil Giridharan, Ittai Abraham, Natacha Crooks, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren

Today's mainstream network timing models for distributed computing are synchrony, partial synchrony, and asynchrony. These models are coarse-grained and often make either too strong or too weak assumptions about the network. This paper introduces a new timing model called granular synchrony that models the network as a mixture of synchronous, partially synchronous, and asynchronous communication links. The new model is not only theoretically interesting but also more representative of real-world networks. It also serves as a unifying framework where current mainstream models are its special cases. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for solving crash and Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus in granular synchrony. Interestingly, consensus among $n$ parties can be achieved against $f geq n/2$ crash faults or $f geq n/3$ Byzantine faults without resorting to full synchrony.

Read more

8/29/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Network Abstractions for Characterizing Communication Requirements in Asynchronous Distributed Systems

Hugo Rincon Galeana, Ulrich Schmid

Whereas distributed computing research has been very successful in exploring the solvability/impossibility border of distributed computing problems like consensus in representative classes of computing models with respect to model parameters like failure bounds, this is not the case for characterizing necessary and sufficient communication requirements. In this paper, we introduce network abstractions as a novel approach for modeling communication requirements in asynchronous distributed systems. A network abstraction of a run is a sequence of directed graphs on the set of processes, where the $i$-th graph specifies some ``potential'' message chains that can be guaranteed to arise in the $i$-th portion of the run. Formally, they are defined via associating message sending times with the end-to-end delays that would arise if the message was indeed sent by the sender's protocol. Network abstractions also allow to reason about future causal cones that might arise in a run, hence also facilitate reasoning about liveness properties, and are inherently compatible with temporal epistemic reasoning frameworks. We demonstrate the utility of our approach by providing necessary and sufficient network abstractions for solving the canonical firing rebels with relay (FRR) problem, and variants thereof, in asynchronous message-passing systems with up to $f$ byzantine processes connected via point-to-point links. FRR is not only a basic primitive in clock synchronization and consensus algorithms, but also integrates several distributed computing problems, namely triggering events, agreement and even stabilizing agreement, in a single problem instance.

Read more

5/27/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Logical Synchrony and the bittide Mechanism

Sanjay Lall, Calin Cascaval, Martin Izzard, Tammo Spalink

We introduce logical synchrony, a framework that allows distributed computing to be coordinated as tightly as in synchronous systems without the distribution of a global clock or any reference to universal time. We develop a model of events called a logical synchrony network, in which nodes correspond to processors and every node has an associated local clock which generates the events. We construct a measure of logical latency and develop its properties. A further model, called a multiclock network, is then analyzed and shown to be a refinement of the logical synchrony network. We present the bittide mechanism as an instantiation of multiclock networks, and discuss the clock control mechanism that ensures that buffers do not overflow or underflow. Finally we give conditions under which a logical synchrony network has an equivalent synchronous realization.

Read more

7/8/2024