SpeciaLex: A Benchmark for In-Context Specialized Lexicon Learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.13297 - Published 7/19/2024 by Joseph Marvin Imperial, Harish Tayyar Madabushi
Total Score

0

SpeciaLex: A Benchmark for In-Context Specialized Lexicon Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper introduces SpeciaLex, a new benchmark for evaluating a language model's ability to learn specialized lexicons in context.

• The benchmark tests a model's understanding of domain-specific terminology and its capacity to learn new specialized vocabulary from context.

• SpeciaLex includes datasets spanning several technical domains, such as law, medicine, and computer science, to assess a model's cross-domain lexical learning capabilities.

Plain English Explanation

This research paper presents a new way to test how well language models can learn specialized vocabulary in different subject areas. The researchers created a benchmark called SpeciaLex that includes datasets covering technical fields like law, medicine, and computer science.

The goal is to evaluate how effectively language models can pick up on and understand domain-specific terminology when they encounter it in context, rather than just having the words memorized. This is an important skill for language models to have, as they are increasingly being used in specialized applications where understanding technical language is crucial.

By testing across multiple domains, the SpeciaLex benchmark can assess a model's ability to learn new specialized lexicons, rather than just performing well on a single topic area. This provides a more comprehensive evaluation of a model's capability to handle specialized language in real-world scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the SpeciaLex benchmark, which is designed to assess a language model's ability to learn specialized lexicons in context. The benchmark includes datasets spanning domains such as law, medicine, and computer science, allowing for cross-domain evaluation of a model's lexical learning capabilities.

The key components of SpeciaLex are:

  • Specialized Lexicon Tasks: These tasks test the model's understanding of domain-specific terminology and its ability to learn new specialized vocabulary from context.
  • Cross-Domain Evaluation: The benchmark covers multiple technical domains, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of a model's generalization abilities across different specialized vocabularies.
  • In-Context Learning: The tasks focus on evaluating a model's capacity to learn new specialized terms from the surrounding context, rather than relying on pre-existing lexical knowledge.

The paper describes the dataset curation process, task design, and baseline model performance on the SpeciaLex benchmark. The results demonstrate the challenges posed by in-context specialized lexicon learning and highlight opportunities for further research and model development in this area.

Critical Analysis

The SpeciaLex benchmark addresses an important gap in the evaluation of language models, as the ability to understand and learn specialized vocabulary is crucial for many real-world applications. By covering multiple technical domains, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive assessment than existing lexical substitution or specialized vocabulary tasks.

However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the current datasets may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of specialized language use in practice. Additionally, the benchmark focuses on in-context lexical learning, but a model's broader understanding of specialized concepts and their relationships may also be important for many applications.

Future work could explore ways to incorporate more contextual and semantic information into the benchmark, as well as investigate the relationship between a model's specialized lexical knowledge and its overall competence in domain-specific tasks. Addressing these limitations could further strengthen the SpeciaLex benchmark and provide more comprehensive insights into a language model's specialized language capabilities.

Conclusion

The SpeciaLex benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating a language model's ability to learn and understand specialized vocabulary in context. By testing across multiple technical domains, the benchmark provides a more robust assessment of a model's cross-domain lexical learning capabilities, which are crucial for the effective deployment of language models in specialized applications.

The insights gained from the SpeciaLex benchmark can inform the development of more capable and versatile language models, ultimately leading to improved performance in real-world scenarios where understanding specialized terminology is paramount. As language models continue to advance, benchmarks like SpeciaLex will play an increasingly vital role in driving progress and ensuring the suitability of these models for specialized tasks and domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

SpeciaLex: A Benchmark for In-Context Specialized Lexicon Learning
Total Score

0

SpeciaLex: A Benchmark for In-Context Specialized Lexicon Learning

Joseph Marvin Imperial, Harish Tayyar Madabushi

Specialized lexicons are collections of words with associated constraints such as special definitions, specific roles, and intended target audiences. These constraints are necessary for content generation and documentation tasks (e.g., writing technical manuals or children's books), where the goal is to reduce the ambiguity of text content and increase its overall readability for a specific group of audience. Understanding how large language models can capture these constraints can help researchers build better, more impactful tools for wider use beyond the NLP community. Towards this end, we introduce SpeciaLex, a benchmark for evaluating a language model's ability to follow specialized lexicon-based constraints across 18 diverse subtasks with 1,285 test instances covering core tasks of Checking, Identification, Rewriting, and Open Generation. We present an empirical evaluation of 15 open and closed-source LLMs and discuss insights on how factors such as model scale, openness, setup, and recency affect performance upon evaluating with the benchmark.

Read more

7/19/2024

ProLex: A Benchmark for Language Proficiency-oriented Lexical Substitution
Total Score

0

ProLex: A Benchmark for Language Proficiency-oriented Lexical Substitution

Xuanming Zhang, Zixun Chen, Zhou Yu

Lexical Substitution discovers appropriate substitutes for a given target word in a context sentence. However, the task fails to consider substitutes that are of equal or higher proficiency than the target, an aspect that could be beneficial for language learners looking to improve their writing. To bridge this gap, we propose a new task, language proficiency-oriented lexical substitution. We also introduce ProLex, a novel benchmark designed to assess systems' ability to generate not only appropriate substitutes but also substitutes that demonstrate better language proficiency. Besides the benchmark, we propose models that can automatically perform the new task. We show that our best model, a Llama2-13B model fine-tuned with task-specific synthetic data, outperforms ChatGPT by an average of 3.2% in F-score and achieves comparable results with GPT-4 on ProLex.

Read more

6/4/2024

💬

Total Score

0

PsychoLex: Unveiling the Psychological Mind of Large Language Models

Mohammad Amin Abbasi, Farnaz Sadat Mirnezami, Hassan Naderi

This paper explores the intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence through the development and evaluation of specialized Large Language Models (LLMs). We introduce PsychoLex, a suite of resources designed to enhance LLMs' proficiency in psychological tasks in both Persian and English. Key contributions include the PsychoLexQA dataset for instructional content and the PsychoLexEval dataset for rigorous evaluation of LLMs in complex psychological scenarios. Additionally, we present the PsychoLexLLaMA model, optimized specifically for psychological applications, demonstrating superior performance compared to general-purpose models. The findings underscore the potential of tailored LLMs for advancing psychological research and applications, while also highlighting areas for further refinement. This research offers a foundational step towards integrating LLMs into specialized psychological domains, with implications for future advancements in AI-driven psychological practice.

Read more

8/19/2024

Lawma: The Power of Specialization for Legal Tasks
Total Score

0

Lawma: The Power of Specialization for Legal Tasks

Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Vedant Nanda, Rediet Abebe, Stefan Bechtold, Christoph Engel, Jens Frankenreiter, Krishna Gummadi, Moritz Hardt, Michael Livermore

Annotation and classification of legal text are central components of empirical legal research. Traditionally, these tasks are often delegated to trained research assistants. Motivated by the advances in language modeling, empirical legal scholars are increasingly turning to prompting commercial models, hoping that it will alleviate the significant cost of human annotation. Despite growing use, our understanding of how to best utilize large language models for legal tasks remains limited. We conduct a comprehensive study of 260 legal text classification tasks, nearly all new to the machine learning community. Starting from GPT-4 as a baseline, we show that it has non-trivial but highly varied zero-shot accuracy, often exhibiting performance that may be insufficient for legal work. We then demonstrate that a lightly fine-tuned Llama 3 model vastly outperforms GPT-4 on almost all tasks, typically by double-digit percentage points. We find that larger models respond better to fine-tuning than smaller models. A few tens to hundreds of examples suffice to achieve high classification accuracy. Notably, we can fine-tune a single model on all 260 tasks simultaneously at a small loss in accuracy relative to having a separate model for each task. Our work points to a viable alternative to the predominant practice of prompting commercial models. For concrete legal tasks with some available labeled data, researchers are better off using a fine-tuned open-source model.

Read more

7/24/2024