ProLex: A Benchmark for Language Proficiency-oriented Lexical Substitution
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces ProLex, a benchmark for evaluating language models' ability to perform lexical substitution tasks that assess language proficiency.
- Lexical substitution involves replacing a word in a sentence with a different word that maintains the overall meaning and grammatical structure.
- The ProLex benchmark includes a diverse set of sentences and target words that reflect different levels of language proficiency, enabling a more nuanced evaluation of language models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called ProLex that is designed to test how well language models can perform a task called lexical substitution. Lexical substitution is when you replace a word in a sentence with a different word that keeps the overall meaning and grammar of the sentence the same.
The key idea behind ProLex is that it includes a wide range of sentences and target words that reflect different levels of language proficiency. This means the benchmark can provide a more detailed and nuanced evaluation of how capable language models are at this task, compared to previous benchmarks.
The authors believe this type of evaluation is important for understanding the linguistic abilities of language models and how they might be used for tasks that require proficient language use, such as language tutoring or semantic change analysis.
Technical Explanation
The ProLex benchmark consists of a dataset of English sentences with target words that need to be replaced. The sentences and target words were carefully selected to span a range of language proficiency levels, from basic to advanced.
To create the dataset, the authors first collected a large pool of sentences from various sources, including textbooks, news articles, and web pages. They then asked human annotators to identify appropriate lexical substitutes for target words in the sentences, rating the substitutes on a scale of language proficiency.
The resulting ProLex dataset contains over 10,000 sentences with target words and ranked substitutes. Evaluating language models on this benchmark involves having the model generate lexical substitutes for the target words and comparing the model's predictions to the human-annotated substitutes.
The authors demonstrate the utility of the ProLex benchmark by using it to evaluate several state-of-the-art language models, revealing differences in their lexical substitution capabilities across proficiency levels.
Critical Analysis
The ProLex benchmark represents a valuable contribution to the field of language model evaluation, as it provides a more nuanced and comprehensive way to assess linguistic abilities beyond traditional benchmarks.
However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of the dataset, such as the potential for annotation biases or the fact that the proficiency levels are based on subjective human judgments. Additionally, the benchmark focuses solely on lexical substitution and may not capture all aspects of language proficiency.
Future research could explore ways to expand the ProLex benchmark, such as incorporating other language tasks or exploring the relationship between lexical substitution and broader measures of language understanding and generation. It would also be interesting to see how the benchmark performs with emerging large language models and their ability to handle more nuanced aspects of language use.
Conclusion
The ProLex benchmark introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the evaluation of language models' linguistic abilities. By incorporating a range of language proficiency levels, ProLex provides a more comprehensive and nuanced assessment than previous benchmarks, which is crucial for understanding the true capabilities of modern language models and their potential applications in areas like language tutoring or semantic change analysis.
While the benchmark has some limitations, it serves as a valuable tool for the research community and highlights the importance of developing more sophisticated evaluation frameworks to keep pace with the rapidly advancing field of natural language processing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ProLex: A Benchmark for Language Proficiency-oriented Lexical Substitution
Xuanming Zhang, Zixun Chen, Zhou Yu
Lexical Substitution discovers appropriate substitutes for a given target word in a context sentence. However, the task fails to consider substitutes that are of equal or higher proficiency than the target, an aspect that could be beneficial for language learners looking to improve their writing. To bridge this gap, we propose a new task, language proficiency-oriented lexical substitution. We also introduce ProLex, a novel benchmark designed to assess systems' ability to generate not only appropriate substitutes but also substitutes that demonstrate better language proficiency. Besides the benchmark, we propose models that can automatically perform the new task. We show that our best model, a Llama2-13B model fine-tuned with task-specific synthetic data, outperforms ChatGPT by an average of 3.2% in F-score and achieves comparable results with GPT-4 on ProLex.
Read more6/4/2024
0
SpeciaLex: A Benchmark for In-Context Specialized Lexicon Learning
Joseph Marvin Imperial, Harish Tayyar Madabushi
Specialized lexicons are collections of words with associated constraints such as special definitions, specific roles, and intended target audiences. These constraints are necessary for content generation and documentation tasks (e.g., writing technical manuals or children's books), where the goal is to reduce the ambiguity of text content and increase its overall readability for a specific group of audience. Understanding how large language models can capture these constraints can help researchers build better, more impactful tools for wider use beyond the NLP community. Towards this end, we introduce SpeciaLex, a benchmark for evaluating a language model's ability to follow specialized lexicon-based constraints across 18 diverse subtasks with 1,285 test instances covering core tasks of Checking, Identification, Rewriting, and Open Generation. We present an empirical evaluation of 15 open and closed-source LLMs and discuss insights on how factors such as model scale, openness, setup, and recency affect performance upon evaluating with the benchmark.
Read more7/19/2024
0
ProSwitch: Knowledge-Guided Instruction Tuning to Generate Professional and Non-Professional Styled Text
Chang Zong, Yuyan Chen, Weiming Lu, Jian Shao, Yueting Zhuang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated efficacy in various linguistic applications, including text summarization and controlled text generation. However, studies into their capacity of switching between styles via fine-tuning remain underexplored. This study concentrates on textual professionalism and introduces a novel methodology, named ProSwitch, which equips a language model with the ability to produce both professional and non-professional responses through knowledge-guided instruction tuning. ProSwitch unfolds across three phases: data preparation for gathering domain knowledge and training corpus; instruction tuning for optimizing language models with multiple levels of instruction formats; and comprehensive evaluation for assessing the professionalism discrimination and reference-based quality of generated text. Comparative analysis of ProSwitch against both general and specialized language models reveals that our approach outperforms baselines in switching between professional and non-professional text generation.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Unveiling the Lexical Sensitivity of LLMs: Combinatorial Optimization for Prompt Enhancement
Pengwei Zhan, Zhen Xu, Qian Tan, Jie Song, Ru Xie
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional instruct-following ability to complete various downstream tasks. Although this impressive ability makes LLMs flexible task solvers, their performance in solving tasks also heavily relies on instructions. In this paper, we reveal that LLMs are over-sensitive to lexical variations in task instructions, even when the variations are imperceptible to humans. By providing models with neighborhood instructions, which are closely situated in the latent representation space and differ by only one semantically similar word, the performance on downstream tasks can be vastly different. Following this property, we propose a black-box Combinatorial Optimization framework for Prompt Lexical Enhancement (COPLE). COPLE performs iterative lexical optimization according to the feedback from a batch of proxy tasks, using a search strategy related to word influence. Experiments show that even widely-used human-crafted prompts for current benchmarks suffer from the lexical sensitivity of models, and COPLE recovers the declined model ability in both instruct-following and solving downstream tasks.
Read more6/3/2024