Speech After Gender: A Trans-Feminine Perspective on Next Steps for Speech Science and Technology

Overview

• This paper discusses the challenges and considerations around speech technology and science from a trans-feminine perspective.
• It argues for the need to move beyond a binary view of gender in speech research and technology development.
• The paper highlights areas where current practices and assumptions in speech science and technology can be harmful or exclusionary to transgender and non-binary individuals.
• It proposes several next steps and recommendations to make speech technology and science more inclusive and responsive to the needs of the transgender community.

Plain English Explanation

Speech technology and the scientific research behind it have historically been developed with a binary view of gender - the assumption that people's voices can be neatly categorized as either male or female. However, this fails to account for the experiences and needs of transgender and non-binary individuals, whose voices may not fit into this simplistic male-female dichotomy.

This paper provides a trans-feminine perspective on the limitations of current speech science and technology, and offers suggestions for how the field can evolve to become more inclusive and affirming. For example, the authors argue that voice training and voice modification tools should move beyond a focus on conforming to traditional gender norms, and instead empower individuals to express their true vocal identity.

The paper also highlights the potential harms that can arise when speech AI and biometric technologies are developed without considering the nuances of gender identity. Voice-based gender prediction models, for instance, may misgender transgender individuals and deny them access to certain services or technologies.

Overall, the key message is that the speech science and technology community needs to adopt a more expansive, gender-inclusive approach that centers the lived experiences of transgender and non-binary people. This will require rethinking fundamental assumptions, research practices, and design priorities in order to create speech technologies that are truly accessible and empowering for all.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing an overview of the current state of speech science and technology, highlighting how the field has historically been dominated by a binary view of gender. The authors argue that this narrow perspective fails to account for the diverse experiences and needs of transgender and non-binary individuals.

The paper then reviews relevant prior work, including research on voice disorder analysis using transformer-based approaches, efforts to develop unified speech-to-speech frameworks that preserve speaker identity, and studies examining semantic gender bias in speech systems. While these works begin to grapple with some of the complexities around gender and speech, the authors argue that a more fundamental shift in perspective is needed.

The core of the paper outlines several key recommendations for the speech science and technology community:

1. Adopt a more expansive, gender-inclusive model that moves beyond the male-female binary. This could involve incorporating articulatory phonetics to enable more controllable and expressive speech synthesis.
2. Center the voices and lived experiences of transgender and non-binary individuals in research and development.
3. Rethink the goals and design priorities of speech technologies, shifting away from a focus on gender conformity and toward empowering individuals to express their authentic vocal identity.
4. Carefully consider the potential harms and unintended consequences of speech technologies, especially when they involve biometric analysis or gender classification.

Throughout the paper, the authors ground their arguments in real-world examples and personal narratives to illustrate the challenges faced by transgender and non-binary individuals in the context of speech science and technology.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important and well-justified concerns about the limitations of current speech science and technology, particularly around the field's reliance on a binary view of gender. The authors present a compelling case for the need to adopt a more expansive, gender-inclusive approach that centers the experiences of transgender and non-binary individuals.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not provide detailed technical solutions or a roadmap for how the speech science and technology community can practically implement the recommended changes. While the authors outline the key principles and priorities that should guide future research and development, more specificity on implementation strategies and evaluation methods would strengthen the paper's impact.

Additionally, the paper could have further explored the potential tensions or trade-offs that may arise when attempting to balance the needs and preferences of different stakeholders (e.g., transgender/non-binary individuals, cisgender individuals, commercial interests, regulatory bodies, etc.) in the design of speech technologies. A more nuanced discussion of these challenges could help readers better understand the complexities involved in realizing the authors' vision.

Overall, the paper offers a valuable and much-needed perspective that should spur important discussions and concrete actions within the speech science and technology community. By heeding the authors' call for a more inclusive and gender-affirming approach, the field can work towards developing speech technologies that better serve the diverse needs of all individuals.

Conclusion

This paper provides a trans-feminine perspective on the shortcomings of current speech science and technology, and outlines key steps the community should take to make the field more inclusive and responsive to the needs of transgender and non-binary individuals.

The authors argue that the field's historical reliance on a binary view of gender has resulted in speech technologies that can be harmful or exclusionary to those outside the male-female dichotomy. To address this, the paper recommends adopting a more expansive, gender-inclusive model, centering the voices and experiences of transgender and non-binary individuals, rethinking the goals and design priorities of speech technologies, and carefully considering the potential harms of biometric and gender classification tools.

By heeding these recommendations, the speech science and technology community can work towards developing voice-based systems and solutions that empower all individuals to express their authentic vocal identity, regardless of their gender identity or expression. This shift in perspective and practice has the potential to make speech technologies more accessible, inclusive, and affirming for people of all backgrounds.