SPIRE: Semantic Prompt-Driven Image Restoration
0
🖼️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This document provides guidelines for authors responding to reviews of their paper submitted to a conference or journal.
- It covers key aspects such as response length, formatting, and addressing reviewer comments.
- The guidelines aim to help authors craft an effective response that addresses the reviewers' concerns and strengthens the overall paper.
Plain English Explanation
When a paper is submitted for publication, it often goes through a peer review process where other experts in the field provide feedback and suggestions for improvement. The LATEX Guidelines for Author Response outlines best practices for how authors should respond to these reviewer comments.
The guidelines start by discussing the appropriate length for the author response, noting that it should be concise yet comprehensive. They then provide formatting instructions, such as using LATEX to ensure a professional and consistent appearance.
The core of the guidelines focuses on how authors should address the specific comments and concerns raised by the reviewers. This involves clearly acknowledging each point, explaining how the author has addressed it, and providing justification where appropriate. The goal is to demonstrate to the reviewers that their feedback has been taken seriously and that the paper has been strengthened as a result.
Throughout the process, the guidelines emphasize the importance of maintaining a professional and constructive tone. This helps to build a positive rapport with the reviewers and increases the chances of the paper being accepted for publication.
Technical Explanation
The LATEX Guidelines for Author Response provide a structured approach for authors to effectively respond to reviewer comments on their submitted paper.
The guidelines begin by recommending a response length that is concise yet comprehensive, typically around 2-3 pages. This ensures the response is focused and easy for reviewers to digest.
In terms of formatting, the guidelines recommend using LATEX to ensure a professional and consistent appearance. This includes instructions for structuring the response, such as using section headings and proper citation formatting.
The core of the guidelines focuses on how authors should address the specific reviewer comments. For each comment, the author should:
- Acknowledge the comment and its relevance.
- Explain how the author has addressed the comment, such as by making changes to the paper or providing additional justification.
- Demonstrate how the changes have strengthened the paper.
This structured approach helps to ensure the author response is comprehensive and addresses all of the reviewers' concerns. It also maintains a professional and constructive tone, which is important for building rapport with the reviewers.
Critical Analysis
The LATEX Guidelines for Author Response provide a solid framework for authors to craft an effective response to reviewer comments. The guidelines cover the key aspects that are critical for a successful author response, such as response length, formatting, and the process for addressing each comment.
One potential limitation of the guidelines is that they may not fully address the nuances of responding to more complex or challenging reviewer comments. For example, the guidelines do not provide guidance on how to handle disagreements with the reviewer or how to push back on comments that the author believes are unfair or misguided.
Additionally, the guidelines do not delve into the broader strategic considerations that authors should keep in mind when responding to reviewer feedback. For instance, authors may need to carefully prioritize which comments to address, based on their perceived importance and the available time and resources.
Despite these potential limitations, the LATEX Guidelines for Author Response provide a solid foundation for authors to craft a professional and effective response to reviewer comments. By following the guidelines, authors can increase the chances of their paper being accepted for publication and demonstrate their commitment to addressing the reviewers' feedback.
Conclusion
The LATEX Guidelines for Author Response offer a comprehensive and structured approach for authors to respond to reviewer comments on their submitted papers. By following the guidelines, authors can craft a concise, well-formatted response that demonstrates their commitment to addressing the reviewers' concerns and strengthening the overall paper.
The guidelines cover key aspects such as response length, formatting, and the process for addressing each reviewer comment. By maintaining a professional and constructive tone, authors can build positive rapport with the reviewers and increase the likelihood of their paper being accepted for publication.
While the guidelines may not address every possible scenario, they provide a solid foundation for authors to navigate the peer review process effectively. By adopting these best practices, authors can optimize their chances of securing publication and contributing to the advancement of their respective fields.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
0
SPIRE: Semantic Prompt-Driven Image Restoration
Chenyang Qi, Zhengzhong Tu, Keren Ye, Mauricio Delbracio, Peyman Milanfar, Qifeng Chen, Hossein Talebi
Text-driven diffusion models have become increasingly popular for various image editing tasks, including inpainting, stylization, and object replacement. However, it still remains an open research problem to adopt this language-vision paradigm for more fine-level image processing tasks, such as denoising, super-resolution, deblurring, and compression artifact removal. In this paper, we develop SPIRE, a Semantic and restoration Prompt-driven Image Restoration framework that leverages natural language as a user-friendly interface to control the image restoration process. We consider the capacity of prompt information in two dimensions. First, we use content-related prompts to enhance the semantic alignment, effectively alleviating identity ambiguity in the restoration outcomes. Second, our approach is the first framework that supports fine-level instruction through language-based quantitative specification of the restoration strength, without the need for explicit task-specific design. In addition, we introduce a novel fusion mechanism that augments the existing ControlNet architecture by learning to rescale the generative prior, thereby achieving better restoration fidelity. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the superior restoration performance of SPIRE compared to the state of the arts, alongside offering the flexibility of text-based control over the restoration effects.
Read more7/17/2024
0
DaLPSR: Leverage Degradation-Aligned Language Prompt for Real-World Image Super-Resolution
Aiwen Jiang, Zhi Wei, Long Peng, Feiqiang Liu, Wenbo Li, Mingwen Wang
Image super-resolution pursuits reconstructing high-fidelity high-resolution counterpart for low-resolution image. In recent years, diffusion-based models have garnered significant attention due to their capabilities with rich prior knowledge. The success of diffusion models based on general text prompts has validated the effectiveness of textual control in the field of text2image. However, given the severe degradation commonly presented in low-resolution images, coupled with the randomness characteristics of diffusion models, current models struggle to adequately discern semantic and degradation information within severely degraded images. This often leads to obstacles such as semantic loss, visual artifacts, and visual hallucinations, which pose substantial challenges for practical use. To address these challenges, this paper proposes to leverage degradation-aligned language prompt for accurate, fine-grained, and high-fidelity image restoration. Complementary priors including semantic content descriptions and degradation prompts are explored. Specifically, on one hand, image-restoration prompt alignment decoder is proposed to automatically discern the degradation degree of LR images, thereby generating beneficial degradation priors for image restoration. On the other hand, much richly tailored descriptions from pretrained multimodal large language model elicit high-level semantic priors closely aligned with human perception, ensuring fidelity control for image restoration. Comprehensive comparisons with state-of-the-art methods have been done on several popular synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets. The quantitative and qualitative analysis have demonstrated that the proposed method achieves a new state-of-the-art perceptual quality level, especially in real-world cases based on reference-free metrics.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Diff-Restorer: Unleashing Visual Prompts for Diffusion-based Universal Image Restoration
Yuhong Zhang, Hengsheng Zhang, Xinning Chai, Zhengxue Cheng, Rong Xie, Li Song, Wenjun Zhang
Image restoration is a classic low-level problem aimed at recovering high-quality images from low-quality images with various degradations such as blur, noise, rain, haze, etc. However, due to the inherent complexity and non-uniqueness of degradation in real-world images, it is challenging for a model trained for single tasks to handle real-world restoration problems effectively. Moreover, existing methods often suffer from over-smoothing and lack of realism in the restored results. To address these issues, we propose Diff-Restorer, a universal image restoration method based on the diffusion model, aiming to leverage the prior knowledge of Stable Diffusion to remove degradation while generating high perceptual quality restoration results. Specifically, we utilize the pre-trained visual language model to extract visual prompts from degraded images, including semantic and degradation embeddings. The semantic embeddings serve as content prompts to guide the diffusion model for generation. In contrast, the degradation embeddings modulate the Image-guided Control Module to generate spatial priors for controlling the spatial structure of the diffusion process, ensuring faithfulness to the original image. Additionally, we design a Degradation-aware Decoder to perform structural correction and convert the latent code to the pixel domain. We conducted comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis on restoration tasks with different degradations, demonstrating the effectiveness and superiority of our approach.
Read more7/8/2024
0
SeeSR: Towards Semantics-Aware Real-World Image Super-Resolution
Rongyuan Wu, Tao Yang, Lingchen Sun, Zhengqiang Zhang, Shuai Li, Lei Zhang
Owe to the powerful generative priors, the pre-trained text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have become increasingly popular in solving the real-world image super-resolution problem. However, as a consequence of the heavy quality degradation of input low-resolution (LR) images, the destruction of local structures can lead to ambiguous image semantics. As a result, the content of reproduced high-resolution image may have semantic errors, deteriorating the super-resolution performance. To address this issue, we present a semantics-aware approach to better preserve the semantic fidelity of generative real-world image super-resolution. First, we train a degradation-aware prompt extractor, which can generate accurate soft and hard semantic prompts even under strong degradation. The hard semantic prompts refer to the image tags, aiming to enhance the local perception ability of the T2I model, while the soft semantic prompts compensate for the hard ones to provide additional representation information. These semantic prompts encourage the T2I model to generate detailed and semantically accurate results. Furthermore, during the inference process, we integrate the LR images into the initial sampling noise to mitigate the diffusion model's tendency to generate excessive random details. The experiments show that our method can reproduce more realistic image details and hold better the semantics. The source code of our method can be found at https://github.com/cswry/SeeSR.
Read more6/5/2024