Spurious Correlations in Machine Learning: A Survey
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey on the topic of spurious correlations in machine learning models.
- Spurious correlations occur when a machine learning model finds an association between an input feature and an output target, even though the two are not causally related.
- The paper explores where these spurious correlations come from, their impact on model performance, and various techniques for mitigating them.
Plain English Explanation
Spurious correlations are like when a machine learning model sees a connection between two things that really have nothing to do with each other. For example, it might notice that people who wear a certain type of shoe tend to do well on a test, even though the shoes don't actually help them perform better.
These kinds of false associations can cause big problems for machine learning models, leading them to make incorrect predictions or decisions. The paper looks at why these spurious correlations happen, like when the training data has hidden biases, and discusses different ways to try to fix this issue.
Some of the techniques mentioned include adding internal link to "Learning Robust Classifiers Against Spurious Correlations" to make the models more robust to spurious features, adding internal link to "Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Self-Supervised Recommendation" to improve recommendations, and adding internal link to "Improving Group Robustness Requires Precisely Defined Spurious Correlation" to better identify and address these issues.
Overall, the paper provides a helpful overview of an important problem in machine learning and some promising approaches for dealing with it.
Technical Explanation
The paper first defines the problem of spurious correlations, where machine learning models find associations between input features and output targets that are not actually causally related. Adding internal link to "How Spurious Features are Memorized: A Precise Analysis" explores how these spurious features can become "memorized" by models during training.
The paper then discusses the various sources of spurious correlations, such as biases in the training data, confounding variables, and the "Clever Hans" effect where models pick up on unintended cues. It also examines the negative impacts of spurious correlations on model generalization and robustness.
Several techniques for mitigating spurious correlations are covered, including adding internal link to "Learning Robust Classifiers Against Spurious Correlations" which uses self-guided training, adding internal link to "Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Self-Supervised Recommendation" which focuses on improving recommendations, and adding internal link to "Improving Group Robustness Requires Precisely Defined Spurious Correlation" which emphasizes the need for precise definitions of spurious correlations.
The paper also discusses the broader implications of spurious correlations, including their relevance to fairness, safety, and ethical concerns in machine learning applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the problem of spurious correlations in machine learning. It covers a wide range of relevant issues and techniques, offering a detailed and technical treatment of the topic.
One potential limitation is that the survey focuses primarily on classification and recommendation tasks, and may not fully address spurious correlations in other types of machine learning problems, such as regression or time series analysis. Additionally, while the paper discusses various mitigation techniques, it does not provide a comprehensive evaluation or comparison of their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Adding internal link to "Corruptions in Supervised Learning Problems: A Typology and Mitigation Strategies" could provide further insights into the broader typology of data corruptions, including spurious correlations, and potential strategies for addressing them.
Overall, the paper is a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on machine learning models, particularly those concerned with issues of robustness, generalization, and ethical considerations.
Conclusion
This paper offers a thorough examination of the problem of spurious correlations in machine learning, a crucial issue that can undermine the reliability and trustworthiness of these models. By exploring the sources of these false associations, their impacts, and various mitigation techniques, the paper provides a comprehensive understanding of this challenge.
The insights and approaches discussed have significant implications for the development of more robust and reliable machine learning systems, which is essential as these models become increasingly pervasive and influential in our lives. The paper serves as an important reference for researchers and practitioners working to address the complex challenges posed by spurious correlations in machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Spurious Correlations in Machine Learning: A Survey
Wenqian Ye, Guangtao Zheng, Xu Cao, Yunsheng Ma, Aidong Zhang
Machine learning systems are known to be sensitive to spurious correlations between non-essential features of the inputs (e.g., background, texture, and secondary objects) and the corresponding labels. These features and their correlations with the labels are known as spurious because they tend to change with shifts in real-world data distributions, which can negatively impact the model's generalization and robustness. In this paper, we provide a review of this issue, along with a taxonomy of current state-of-the-art methods for addressing spurious correlations in machine learning models. Additionally, we summarize existing datasets, benchmarks, and metrics to aid future research. The paper concludes with a discussion of the recent advancements and future challenges in this field, aiming to provide valuable insights for researchers in the related domains.
Read more5/20/2024
0
Out of spuriousity: Improving robustness to spurious correlations without group annotations
Phuong Quynh Le, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert
Machine learning models are known to learn spurious correlations, i.e., features having strong relations with class labels but no causal relation. Relying on those correlations leads to poor performance in the data groups without these correlations and poor generalization ability. To improve the robustness of machine learning models to spurious correlations, we propose an approach to extract a subnetwork from a fully trained network that does not rely on spurious correlations. The subnetwork is found by the assumption that data points with the same spurious attribute will be close to each other in the representation space when training with ERM, then we employ supervised contrastive loss in a novel way to force models to unlearn the spurious connections. The increase in the worst-group performance of our approach contributes to strengthening the hypothesis that there exists a subnetwork in a fully trained dense network that is responsible for using only invariant features in classification tasks, therefore erasing the influence of spurious features even in the setup of multi spurious attributes and no prior knowledge of attributes labels.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Spuriousness-Aware Meta-Learning for Learning Robust Classifiers
Guangtao Zheng, Wenqian Ye, Aidong Zhang
Spurious correlations are brittle associations between certain attributes of inputs and target variables, such as the correlation between an image background and an object class. Deep image classifiers often leverage them for predictions, leading to poor generalization on the data where the correlations do not hold. Mitigating the impact of spurious correlations is crucial towards robust model generalization, but it often requires annotations of the spurious correlations in data -- a strong assumption in practice. In this paper, we propose a novel learning framework based on meta-learning, termed SPUME -- SPUriousness-aware MEta-learning, to train an image classifier to be robust to spurious correlations. We design the framework to iteratively detect and mitigate the spurious correlations that the classifier excessively relies on for predictions. To achieve this, we first propose to utilize a pre-trained vision-language model to extract text-format attributes from images. These attributes enable us to curate data with various class-attribute correlations, and we formulate a novel metric to measure the degree of these correlations' spuriousness. Then, to mitigate the reliance on spurious correlations, we propose a meta-learning strategy in which the support (training) sets and query (test) sets in tasks are curated with different spurious correlations that have high degrees of spuriousness. By meta-training the classifier on these spuriousness-aware meta-learning tasks, our classifier can learn to be invariant to the spurious correlations. We demonstrate that our method is robust to spurious correlations without knowing them a priori and achieves the best on five benchmark datasets with different robustness measures.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Learning Robust Classifiers with Self-Guided Spurious Correlation Mitigation
Guangtao Zheng, Wenqian Ye, Aidong Zhang
Deep neural classifiers tend to rely on spurious correlations between spurious attributes of inputs and targets to make predictions, which could jeopardize their generalization capability. Training classifiers robust to spurious correlations typically relies on annotations of spurious correlations in data, which are often expensive to get. In this paper, we tackle an annotation-free setting and propose a self-guided spurious correlation mitigation framework. Our framework automatically constructs fine-grained training labels tailored for a classifier obtained with empirical risk minimization to improve its robustness against spurious correlations. The fine-grained training labels are formulated with different prediction behaviors of the classifier identified in a novel spuriousness embedding space. We construct the space with automatically detected conceptual attributes and a novel spuriousness metric which measures how likely a class-attribute correlation is exploited for predictions. We demonstrate that training the classifier to distinguish different prediction behaviors reduces its reliance on spurious correlations without knowing them a priori and outperforms prior methods on five real-world datasets.
Read more5/7/2024