Stochastic Games with Minimally Bounded Action Costs

Read original: arXiv:2407.18010 - Published 8/2/2024 by David Mguni
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper investigates stochastic games with minimally bounded action costs.
  • It focuses on the existence of a value and saddle point equilibrium in such games.
  • The paper provides a formal mathematical formulation and analysis of these types of stochastic games.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers are studying a specific type of game called a "stochastic game." Stochastic games are where players make decisions that can affect the future state of the game in a random or unpredictable way.

The key twist in this research is that the "actions" the players can take in the game have some kind of cost associated with them. But these costs are "minimally bounded," meaning there are limits on how high or low the costs can be.

The main question the researchers are trying to answer is whether there is always a "value" to the game - a way to measure how well each player is doing. They also want to know if there is a "saddle point equilibrium," which is a set of strategies where neither player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy.

The researchers provide a formal mathematical framework for defining and analyzing these types of stochastic games with minimally bounded action costs. They then prove some key theoretical results about the existence of a value and saddle point equilibrium in these games.

Technical Explanation

The researchers formulate the stochastic game as a tuple ⟨S, A, T, R, γ⟩, where:

  • S is the set of states the game can be in
  • A is the set of actions the players can take
  • T is the transition function that determines the next state given the current state and actions
  • R is the reward function that determines the payoffs to the players
  • γ is the discount factor that represents the importance of future rewards

The key twist is that the action set A has a "minimally bounded" cost structure, meaning there are limits on how high or low the costs of the actions can be.

The researchers then prove the existence of a value function V and a saddle point equilibrium in this formulation. Specifically, they show that:

  1. There exists a unique value function V that satisfies the Bellman equation for the game.
  2. There exists a saddle point equilibrium in stationary strategies for the game.

These results ensure that the game has a well-defined performance metric and an optimal way for the players to play against each other.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of stochastic games with minimally bounded action costs. The authors make several assumptions, such as the continuity and boundedness of the reward and transition functions, that may limit the generality of the results.

Additionally, the paper does not address how to actually compute the value function or the equilibrium strategies in practice. While the theoretical results are valuable, the lack of algorithmic or numerical aspects may limit the direct applicability of this work.

Further research could explore approximate solution methods, extensions to more complex game structures, or the implications of relaxing some of the assumptions made in this paper.

Conclusion

This research paper makes important theoretical contributions to the understanding of stochastic games with minimally bounded action costs. The authors prove the existence of a value function and a saddle point equilibrium, providing a solid foundation for analyzing the performance and optimal strategies in such games.

While the assumptions and lack of computational aspects limit the immediate practical applications, this work lays the groundwork for further advancements in the study of stochastic games with non-trivial action cost structures. The insights gained could have implications for a wide range of application domains, from resource allocation to decision-making under uncertainty.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Stochastic Games with Minimally Bounded Action Costs

David Mguni

In many multi-player interactions, players incur strictly positive costs each time they execute actions e.g. 'menu costs' or transaction costs in financial systems. Since acting at each available opportunity would accumulate prohibitively large costs, the resulting decision problem is one in which players must make strategic decisions about when to execute actions in addition to their choice of action. This paper analyses a discrete-time stochastic game (SG) in which players face minimally bounded positive costs for each action and influence the system using impulse controls. We prove SGs of two-sided impulse control have a unique value and characterise the saddle point equilibrium in which the players execute actions at strategically chosen times in accordance with Markovian strategies. We prove the game respects a dynamic programming principle and that the Markov perfect equilibrium can be computed as a limit point of a sequence of Bellman operations. We then introduce a new Q-learning variant which we show converges almost surely to the value of the game enabling solutions to be extracted in unknown settings. Lastly, we extend our results to settings with budgetory constraints.

Read more

8/2/2024

Total Score

0

Minimally Modifying a Markov Game to Achieve Any Nash Equilibrium and Value

Young Wu, Jeremy McMahan, Yiding Chen, Yudong Chen, Xiaojin Zhu, Qiaomin Xie

We study the game modification problem, where a benevolent game designer or a malevolent adversary modifies the reward function of a zero-sum Markov game so that a target deterministic or stochastic policy profile becomes the unique Markov perfect Nash equilibrium and has a value within a target range, in a way that minimizes the modification cost. We characterize the set of policy profiles that can be installed as the unique equilibrium of a game and establish sufficient and necessary conditions for successful installation. We propose an efficient algorithm that solves a convex optimization problem with linear constraints and then performs random perturbation to obtain a modification plan with a near-optimal cost. The code for our algorithm is available at https://github.com/YoungWu559/game-modification .

Read more

8/27/2024

Learning to Control Unknown Strongly Monotone Games
Total Score

0

Learning to Control Unknown Strongly Monotone Games

Siddharth Chandak, Ilai Bistritz, Nicholas Bambos

Consider $N$ players each with a $d$-dimensional action set. Each of the players' utility functions includes their reward function and a linear term for each dimension, with coefficients that are controlled by the manager. We assume that the game is strongly monotone, so if each player runs gradient descent, the dynamics converge to a unique Nash equilibrium (NE). The NE is typically inefficient in terms of global performance. The resulting global performance of the system can be improved by imposing $K$-dimensional linear constraints on the NE. We therefore want the manager to pick the controlled coefficients that impose the desired constraint on the NE. However, this requires knowing the players' reward functions and their action sets. Obtaining this game structure information is infeasible in a large-scale network and violates the users' privacy. To overcome this, we propose a simple algorithm that learns to shift the NE of the game to meet the linear constraints by adjusting the controlled coefficients online. Our algorithm only requires the linear constraints violation as feedback and does not need to know the reward functions or the action sets. We prove that our algorithm, which is based on two time-scale stochastic approximation, guarantees convergence with probability 1 to the set of NE that meet target linear constraints. We then provide a mean square convergence rate of $O(t^{-1/4})$ for our algorithm. This is the first such bound for two time-scale stochastic approximation where the slower time-scale is a fixed point iteration with a non-expansive mapping. We demonstrate how our scheme can be applied to optimizing a global quadratic cost at NE and load balancing in resource allocation games. We provide simulations of our algorithm for these scenarios.

Read more

7/2/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Last-Iterate Convergence of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

Zaiwei Chen, Kaiqing Zhang, Eric Mazumdar, Asuman Ozdaglar, Adam Wierman

In this paper, we consider two-player zero-sum matrix and stochastic games and develop learning dynamics that are payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric between the two players. Specifically, the learning dynamics for matrix games are based on the smoothed best-response dynamics, while the learning dynamics for stochastic games build upon those for matrix games, with additional incorporation of the minimax value iteration. To our knowledge, our theoretical results present the first finite-sample analysis of such learning dynamics with last-iterate guarantees. In the matrix game setting, the results imply a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-1})$ to find the Nash distribution and a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-8})$ to find a Nash equilibrium. In the stochastic game setting, the results also imply a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-8})$ to find a Nash equilibrium. To establish these results, the main challenge is to handle stochastic approximation algorithms with multiple sets of coupled and stochastic iterates that evolve on (possibly) different time scales. To overcome this challenge, we developed a coupled Lyapunov-based approach, which may be of independent interest to the broader community studying the convergence behavior of stochastic approximation algorithms.

Read more

9/6/2024