Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classification
0
🏷️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the problem of online strategic classification, where a machine learning model must make predictions while considering the potential strategic responses of individuals to the model's outputs.
- The authors focus on improving the bounds on the strategic Littlestone dimension, a complexity measure that captures the difficulty of the strategic classification task.
- They present new upper and lower bounds on the strategic Littlestone dimension, which have implications for the design of efficient online learning algorithms in strategic environments.
Plain English Explanation
When a machine learning model is used to make decisions that affect people, those people may try to game the system and adjust their behavior to get a more favorable outcome. This is known as "strategic" behavior, and it can make the model's job much harder.
In this paper, the researchers looked at a specific type of strategic behavior called the "strategic Littlestone dimension." This is a way to measure how difficult it is for a model to learn and make predictions in the face of strategic behavior.
The researchers were able to find new upper and lower bounds on the strategic Littlestone dimension. This means they were able to better understand the limits of how hard these strategic classification problems can be. This insight could help researchers design more efficient online learning algorithms for situations where people might try to game the system.
For example, imagine a model that is used to decide who gets a loan. If people know how the model works, they might try to manipulate their application to get approved, even if they don't really qualify. The strategic Littlestone dimension could help us understand how hard it is for the model to learn and make good decisions in the face of this kind of strategic behavior.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the problem of online strategic classification, where a learner must make a sequence of predictions in the face of strategic agents who can respond to the learner's predictions. The authors study the strategic Littlestone dimension, a complexity measure that captures the difficulty of the strategic classification task.
The authors present new upper and lower bounds on the strategic Littlestone dimension. Specifically, they show that the strategic Littlestone dimension is upper bounded by the VC dimension of the base concept class, and lower bounded by the Littlestone dimension of the base concept class. These bounds have implications for the design of efficient online learning algorithms in strategic environments.
The authors also provide a characterization of the strategic Littlestone dimension in terms of the existence of "hard" examples, where the learner is forced to make a prediction that leads to a poor outcome regardless of the agents' responses. This characterization leads to the new upper and lower bounds.
Finally, the authors discuss the connections between the strategic Littlestone dimension and other complexity measures, such as the online classification prediction problem and the one-shot strategic classification problem.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a solid theoretical analysis of the strategic Littlestone dimension and its connections to other complexity measures. The new upper and lower bounds are interesting and have the potential to guide the design of more efficient online learning algorithms in strategic environments.
However, the paper does not address the practical challenges of implementing these algorithms in real-world settings. The analysis assumes a simplified model of strategic behavior, and it's unclear how well the theoretical results would translate to more complex, realistic scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential societal implications of strategic classification. In many real-world applications, such as loan approvals or job applications, strategic behavior can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. The paper could have benefited from a more in-depth discussion of these ethical considerations and how they might impact the practical use of the proposed techniques.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the theoretical understanding of strategic classification, but more work is needed to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and to address the broader social and ethical implications of this research.
Conclusion
This paper presents new upper and lower bounds on the strategic Littlestone dimension, a complexity measure that captures the difficulty of online strategic classification problems. These bounds have implications for the design of efficient online learning algorithms in strategic environments, where individuals may try to game the system to get more favorable outcomes.
The theoretical analysis in the paper provides a solid foundation for further research in this area, but more work is needed to address the practical and ethical challenges of implementing strategic classification models in real-world applications. By considering these broader implications, researchers can help ensure that the development of strategic classification techniques ultimately benefits society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏷️
0
Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classification
Saba Ahmadi, Kunhe Yang, Hanrui Zhang
We study the problem of online binary classification in settings where strategic agents can modify their observable features to receive a positive classification. We model the set of feasible manipulations by a directed graph over the feature space, and assume the learner only observes the manipulated features instead of the original ones. We introduce the Strategic Littlestone Dimension, a new combinatorial measure that captures the joint complexity of the hypothesis class and the manipulation graph. We demonstrate that it characterizes the instance-optimal mistake bounds for deterministic learning algorithms in the realizable setting. We also achieve improved regret in the agnostic setting by a refined agnostic-to-realizable reduction that accounts for the additional challenge of not observing agents' original features. Finally, we relax the assumption that the learner knows the manipulation graph, instead assuming their knowledge is captured by a family of graphs. We derive regret bounds in both the realizable setting where all agents manipulate according to the same graph within the graph family, and the agnostic setting where the manipulation graphs are chosen adversarially and not consistently modeled by a single graph in the family.
Read more7/17/2024
🏷️
0
One-Shot Strategic Classification Under Unknown Costs
Elan Rosenfeld, Nir Rosenfeld
The goal of strategic classification is to learn decision rules which are robust to strategic input manipulation. Earlier works assume that these responses are known; while some recent works handle unknown responses, they exclusively study online settings with repeated model deployments. But there are many domains$unicode{x2014}$particularly in public policy, a common motivating use case$unicode{x2014}$where multiple deployments are infeasible, or where even one bad round is unacceptable. To address this gap, we initiate the formal study of one-shot strategic classification under unknown responses, which requires committing to a single classifier once. Focusing on uncertainty in the users' cost function, we begin by proving that for a broad class of costs, even a small mis-estimation of the true cost can entail trivial accuracy in the worst case. In light of this, we frame the task as a minimax problem, aiming to minimize worst-case risk over an uncertainty set of costs. We design efficient algorithms for both the full-batch and stochastic settings, which we prove converge (offline) to the minimax solution at the rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(T^{-frac{1}{2}})$. Our analysis reveals important structure stemming from strategic responses, particularly the value of dual norm regularization with respect to the cost function.
Read more6/24/2024
👁️
0
Online Learning with Set-Valued Feedback
Vinod Raman, Unique Subedi, Ambuj Tewari
We study a variant of online multiclass classification where the learner predicts a single label but receives a textit{set of labels} as feedback. In this model, the learner is penalized for not outputting a label contained in the revealed set. We show that unlike online multiclass learning with single-label feedback, deterministic and randomized online learnability are textit{not equivalent} even in the realizable setting with set-valued feedback. Accordingly, we give two new combinatorial dimensions, named the Set Littlestone and Measure Shattering dimension, that tightly characterize deterministic and randomized online learnability respectively in the realizable setting. In addition, we show that the Measure Shattering dimension characterizes online learnability in the agnostic setting and tightly quantifies the minimax regret. Finally, we use our results to establish bounds on the minimax regret for three practical learning settings: online multilabel ranking, online multilabel classification, and real-valued prediction with interval-valued response.
Read more6/21/2024
🛠️
0
Learning Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds from Optimization
Chengli Tan, Jiangshe Zhang, Junmin Liu
One of the fundamental challenges in the deep learning community is to theoretically understand how well a deep neural network generalizes to unseen data. However, current approaches often yield generalization bounds that are either too loose to be informative of the true generalization error or only valid to the compressed nets. In this study, we present a simple yet non-vacuous generalization bound from the optimization perspective. We achieve this goal by leveraging that the hypothesis set accessed by stochastic gradient algorithms is essentially fractal-like and thus can derive a tighter bound over the algorithm-dependent Rademacher complexity. The main argument rests on modeling the discrete-time recursion process via a continuous-time stochastic differential equation driven by fractional Brownian motion. Numerical studies demonstrate that our approach is able to yield plausible generalization guarantees for modern neural networks such as ResNet and Vision Transformer, even when they are trained on a large-scale dataset (e.g. ImageNet-1K).
Read more7/23/2024