Online Learning with Set-Valued Feedback

Overview

• This paper studies a variant of online multiclass classification where the learner predicts a single label but receives a set of labels as feedback.
• The learner is penalized for not outputting a label contained in the revealed set.
• The paper shows that unlike online multiclass learning with single-label feedback, deterministic and randomized online learnability are not equivalent even in the realizable setting with set-valued feedback.
• The paper introduces two new combinatorial dimensions, the Set Littlestone and Measure Shattering dimensions, that characterize deterministic and randomized online learnability respectively in the realizable setting.
• The Measure Shattering dimension is also shown to characterize online learnability in the agnostic setting and tightly quantify the minimax regret.
• The results are used to establish bounds on the minimax regret for three practical learning settings: online multilabel ranking, online multilabel classification, and real-valued prediction with interval-valued response.

Plain English Explanation

In a typical multiclass classification problem, a learner is asked to predict a single label from a set of possible labels. However, this paper considers a variant where the learner receives a set of labels as feedback, instead of a single label. The learner is penalized if they don't output a label that is in the revealed set.

The paper shows that, unlike the standard multiclass setting, in this new setting, deterministic and randomized online learning are not equivalent. This means that there are some problems that can be solved efficiently using randomized algorithms, but not with deterministic algorithms.

To understand this difference, the researchers introduce two new mathematical concepts: the Set Littlestone dimension and the Measure Shattering dimension. These dimensions characterize the complexity of the learning problem and determine whether deterministic or randomized algorithms are more effective.

The paper also shows that the Measure Shattering dimension can be used to quantify the minimax regret, which is a measure of how well an online learning algorithm can perform compared to the best possible algorithm.

Finally, the researchers apply these results to three practical learning settings: online multilabel ranking, online multilabel classification, and real-valued prediction with interval-valued response. They are able to establish bounds on the minimax regret for these problems, which is important for understanding the theoretical limits of online learning.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies a variant of online multiclass classification where the learner predicts a single label, but receives a set of labels as feedback. The learner is penalized for not outputting a label contained in the revealed set.

The key theoretical results are:

1. Deterministic vs. Randomized Learnability: The paper shows that unlike online multiclass learning with single-label feedback, deterministic and randomized online learnability are not equivalent even in the realizable setting with set-valued feedback.

2. Characterizing Learnability: The paper introduces two new combinatorial dimensions, the Set Littlestone dimension and the Measure Shattering dimension, that tightly characterize deterministic and randomized online learnability respectively in the realizable setting.

3. Agnostic Learnability and Minimax Regret: The paper shows that the Measure Shattering dimension characterizes online learnability in the agnostic setting and tightly quantifies the minimax regret.

The paper then applies these theoretical results to establish bounds on the minimax regret for three practical learning settings:

1. [object Object]: The learner must rank a set of items, and receives feedback in the form of a set of highly ranked items.

2. [object Object]: The learner must predict a single label, but receives feedback in the form of a set of relevant labels.

3. [object Object]: The learner must predict a real-valued output, and receives feedback in the form of an interval containing the true value.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several important contributions to the understanding of online learning with set-valued feedback. The introduction of the Set Littlestone and Measure Shattering dimensions is a significant theoretical advance, as it provides a way to characterize the complexity of learning problems in this setting.

One potential limitation of the work is that it focuses primarily on the realizable setting, where the learner has access to a perfect hypothesis that can fit the data. It would be interesting to see how these results extend to the more general agnostic setting, where the learner may not have access to such a perfect hypothesis.

Additionally, while the paper establishes bounds on the minimax regret for several practical learning settings, it would be valuable to see empirical validation of these bounds on real-world datasets. This could help to understand the tightness of the theoretical guarantees and their practical relevance.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of online learning with set-valued feedback, and its results have the potential to inform the design of more effective algorithms for a variety of practical applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel variant of online multiclass classification where the learner receives a set of labels as feedback, rather than a single label. The key theoretical contributions include:

1. Showing that deterministic and randomized online learnability are not equivalent in this setting, even in the realizable case.
2. Defining two new combinatorial dimensions, the Set Littlestone and Measure Shattering dimensions, that characterize deterministic and randomized online learnability, respectively.
3. Demonstrating that the Measure Shattering dimension can be used to tightly quantify the minimax regret in the agnostic setting.

The paper then applies these theoretical results to establish bounds on the minimax regret for three practical learning settings: online multilabel ranking, online multilabel classification, and real-valued prediction with interval-valued response. These bounds provide valuable insights into the theoretical limits of online learning with set-valued feedback, which could inform the design of more effective algorithms for a variety of applications.