Structsum Generation for Faster Text Comprehension
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new approach called "StructSum" for generating structured summaries of text to improve reading comprehension.
- The key idea is to use large language models to generate concise, structured outlines or "StructSums" that capture the key information and relationships in a given text.
- The authors demonstrate that these StructSums can help people understand and retain the main points of long documents more effectively than traditional unstructured summaries.
Plain English Explanation
The goal of this research is to make it easier for people to understand and remember the key information in lengthy text documents. The researchers developed a new technique called "StructSum" that uses large AI language models to automatically generate concise, structured outlines or summaries of a given text.
Rather than just providing a long, unstructured summary, the StructSum approach tries to capture the main ideas, concepts, and relationships in a more organized, hierarchical format. This structured output is designed to mirror how humans naturally comprehend and remember information.
The researchers found that when people were given these StructSum outlines, they were able to better understand and recall the central points of the original document, compared to reading a traditional unstructured summary. This suggests that the StructSum approach can enhance text comprehension and learning.
The underlying insight is that large language models, when properly prompted, can generate these structured summaries quite effectively. The structure helps people more easily grasp the core content and flow of the information, similar to how an outline or table of contents aids understanding of a long book or report.
Technical Explanation
The key technical innovation in this paper is the "StructSum" approach, which takes a given text as input and generates a structured, hierarchical summary as output. This StructSum format includes a high-level outline of the main topics, as well as more detailed sub-sections capturing key points and relationships.
The authors experimented with different prompting strategies to guide large language models, such as GPT-3, to produce these structured summaries. They found that providing explicit instructions and templates for the desired output structure (e.g. headings, bullet points) led to more coherent and informative StructSums.
To evaluate the effectiveness of StructSums, the researchers conducted user studies where participants were given either a traditional unstructured summary or a StructSum for various long-form texts. The results showed that the StructSum group demonstrated significantly better comprehension and retention of the core information compared to the control group.
The authors attribute this performance boost to the way StructSums mirror the natural cognitive process of understanding complex information. The structured format helps readers more easily identify the main concepts, their relationships, and the overall narrative flow - aiding both initial understanding and long-term recall.
Critical Analysis
One key limitation noted in the paper is the reliance on prompting to generate the desired StructSum format. While the authors demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach, it requires careful engineering of the prompts and may not generalize well to all types of input texts.
Additionally, the evaluation was conducted primarily on relatively narrow, technical domains. It remains to be seen how well the StructSum approach would work for more open-ended, creative, or colloquial text genres. The authors acknowledge the need for further testing across a broader range of content and use cases.
Another potential issue is the potential for bias or inconsistencies in the generated StructSums, given the stochastic nature of large language models. The authors did not extensively explore the reliability and reproducibility of the StructSum outputs, which could be an important factor for real-world applications.
Overall, this research provides a promising new direction for enhancing text comprehension through structured summarization. However, continued work is needed to improve the generalizability, robustness, and scalability of the StructSum approach before it can be widely deployed. Careful consideration of potential pitfalls, such as model biases and prompting challenges, will also be crucial.
Conclusion
In summary, this paper introduces the novel concept of "StructSum" - the generation of structured, hierarchical summaries using large language models. The key insight is that this format can better mirror human cognitive processes for understanding and retaining complex information, leading to improved text comprehension compared to traditional unstructured summaries.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through user studies, and provide a technical foundation for further exploration and refinement of StructSum generation techniques. While some limitations and open challenges remain, this work represents an exciting step towards developing more intelligent and user-friendly tools for consuming and learning from large amounts of text-based information.
As language models continue to advance, the ability to automatically produce high-quality, structured summaries could have broad applications in education, research, and knowledge management. This research lays important groundwork for realizing these benefits and enhancing human engagement with text-based content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Structsum Generation for Faster Text Comprehension
Parag Jain, Andreea Marzoca, Francesco Piccinno
We consider the task of generating structured representations of text using large language models (LLMs). We focus on tables and mind maps as representative modalities. Tables are more organized way of representing data, while mind maps provide a visually dynamic and flexible approach, particularly suitable for sparse content. Despite the effectiveness of LLMs on different tasks, we show that current models struggle with generating structured outputs. In response, we present effective prompting strategies for both of these tasks. We introduce a taxonomy of problems around factuality, global and local structure, common to both modalities and propose a set of critiques to tackle these issues resulting in an absolute improvement in accuracy of +37pp (79%) for mind maps and +15pp (78%) for tables. To evaluate semantic coverage of generated structured representations we propose Auto-QA, and we verify the adequacy of Auto-QA using SQuAD dataset. We further evaluate the usefulness of structured representations via a text comprehension user study. The results show a significant reduction in comprehension time compared to text when using table (42.9%) and mind map (31.9%), without loss in accuracy.
Read more6/21/2024
💬
0
Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Study
Yuan Sui, Mengyu Zhou, Mingjie Zhou, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang
Large language models (LLMs) are becoming attractive as few-shot reasoners to solve Natural Language (NL)-related tasks. However, the understanding of their capability to process structured data like tables remains an under-explored area. While tables can be serialized as input for LLMs, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on whether LLMs genuinely comprehend this data. In this paper, we try to understand this by designing a benchmark to evaluate the structural understanding capabilities of LLMs through seven distinct tasks, e.g., cell lookup, row retrieval and size detection. Specially, we perform a series of evaluations on the recent most advanced LLM models, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 and observe that performance varied with different input choices, including table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks. Drawing from the insights gained through the benchmark evaluations, we propose $textit{self-augmentation}$ for effective structural prompting, such as critical value / range identification using internal knowledge of LLMs. When combined with carefully chosen input choices, these structural prompting methods lead to promising improvements in LLM performance on a variety of tabular tasks, e.g., TabFact($uparrow2.31%$), HybridQA($uparrow2.13%$), SQA($uparrow2.72%$), Feverous($uparrow0.84%$), and ToTTo($uparrow5.68%$). We believe that our open source benchmark and proposed prompting methods can serve as a simple yet generic selection for future research. The code and data of this paper will be temporality released at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/StructuredLLM-76F3/README.md and will be replaced with an official one at https://github.com/microsoft/TableProvider later.
Read more7/18/2024
0
StructLM: Towards Building Generalist Models for Structured Knowledge Grounding
Alex Zhuang, Ge Zhang, Tianyu Zheng, Xinrun Du, Junjie Wang, Weiming Ren, Stephen W. Huang, Jie Fu, Xiang Yue, Wenhu Chen
Structured data sources, such as tables, graphs, and databases, are ubiquitous knowledge sources. Despite the demonstrated capabilities of large language models (LLMs) on plain text, their proficiency in interpreting and utilizing structured data remains limited. Our investigation reveals a notable deficiency in LLMs' ability to process structured data, e.g., ChatGPT lags behind state-of-the-art (SoTA) model by an average of 35%. To augment the Structured Knowledge Grounding (SKG) capabilities in LLMs, we have developed a comprehensive instruction tuning dataset comprising 1.1 million examples. Utilizing this dataset, we train a series of models, referred to as StructLM, based on the Mistral and the CodeLlama model family, ranging from 7B to 34B parameters. Our StructLM series surpasses task-specific models on 16 out of 18 evaluated datasets and establishes new SoTA performance on 8 SKG tasks. Furthermore, StructLM demonstrates strong generalization across 6 novel held-out SKG tasks, outperforming TableLlama by an average of 35% and Flan-UL2 20B by an average of 10%. Contrary to expectations, we observe that scaling model size offers marginal benefits, with StructLM-34B showing only slight improvements over StructLM-7B. This suggests that structured knowledge grounding is still a challenging task and requires more innovative design to push to a new level.
Read more4/24/2024
💬
0
Struc-Bench: Are Large Language Models Really Good at Generating Complex Structured Data?
Xiangru Tang, Yiming Zong, Jason Phang, Yilun Zhao, Wangchunshu Zhou, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
Despite the remarkable capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, producing complex, structured tabular data remains challenging. Our study assesses LLMs' proficiency in structuring tables and introduces a novel fine-tuning method, cognizant of data structures, to bolster their performance. We unveil Struc-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark featuring prominent LLMs (GPT-NeoX-20B, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Vicuna), which spans text tables, HTML, and LaTeX formats. Our proposed FormatCoT aids in crafting format-specific instructions from the intended outputs to populate this benchmark. Addressing the gap in task-centered evaluation, we propose two innovative metrics, P-Score (Prompting Score) and H-Score (Heuristical Score), to more accurately gauge LLM performance. Our experiments show that applying our structure-aware fine-tuning to LLaMA-7B leads to substantial performance gains, outshining its LLM counterparts across most measures. In-depth error analysis and creating an ability map across six dimensions -- coverage, formatting, reasoning, comprehension, pragmatics, and hallucination -- highlight areas for future enhancements and suggest forthcoming research trajectories. Our code and models can be found at https://github.com/gersteinlab/Struc-Bench.
Read more4/8/2024