A Study of Digital Appliances Accessibility for People with Visual Disabilities
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of sign language versus touch-based input for accessible interfaces and assistive technologies.
- The researchers investigate the potential advantages and limitations of each input modality for users with visual impairments.
- The paper also discusses the design considerations for creating born-accessible courses and data visualization tools.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper examines different ways for people with visual impairments to interact with technology. It compares sign language-based input to using touch-based controls, and looks at the pros and cons of each approach.
The paper also explores how to design courses and data visualization tools that are accessible from the start, without requiring retrofitting. This is important because it helps ensure that people with disabilities can fully participate.
Overall, the research aims to identify better ways to make technology and digital content more accessible and inclusive for users with visual impairments. The findings could inform the development of new assistive interfaces and devices that meet the needs of this user group.
Technical Explanation
The paper compares the use of sign language-based input versus touch-based controls for accessible interfaces and assistive technologies. Through user studies, the researchers evaluate the performance, user experience, and accessibility of each input modality for individuals with visual impairments.
The paper also explores the design of born-accessible courses and data visualization tools. By incorporating accessibility features from the outset, rather than retrofitting, the authors demonstrate how to create digital content that is inclusive and equitable for all users, including those with disabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and nuanced analysis of the trade-offs between sign language-based and touch-based input. While the researchers acknowledge the potential advantages of sign language, they also highlight the need for wider adoption and standardization before it can be widely deployed.
One potential limitation not addressed in the paper is the variability in sign language proficiency among users with visual impairments. The authors could have explored how this factor might impact the effectiveness and user experience of sign language-based interfaces.
Additionally, the paper's focus on born-accessible design is commendable, but the authors could have delved deeper into the specific challenges and best practices for creating truly inclusive digital content and tools. Further research in this area could yield valuable insights for developers and educators.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of accessible technology and inclusive design. By comparing different input modalities and design approaches, the researchers offer practical guidance for creating more equitable and supportive experiences for users with visual impairments.
The findings from this study could inform the development of new assistive interfaces and devices that better meet the needs of this user group. Additionally, the insights on born-accessible design could help advance the creation of more inclusive digital content and educational resources.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Study of Digital Appliances Accessibility for People with Visual Disabilities
Hyunjin An, Hyundoug Kim, Seungwoo Hong, Youngsun Shin
This research aims to find where visually impaired users find appliances hard to use and suggest guideline to solve this issue. 181 visually impaired users have been surveyed, and 12 visually impaired users have been selected based on disability cause and classification. In a home-like environment, we had participants perform tasks which were sorted using Hierarchical task analysis on six major home appliances. From this research we found out that home appliances sometimes only provide visual information which causes difficulty in sensory processing. Also, interfaces tactile/auditory feedbacks are the same making it hard for people to recognize which feature is processed. Blind users cannot see the provided information so they rely on long-term memory to use products. This research provides guideline for button, knob and remote control interface for visually impaired users. This information will be helpful for project planners, designers, and developers to create products which are accessible by visually impaired people. Some of the features will be applied to upcoming home appliance products.
Read more7/10/2024
0
A Recipe for Success? Exploring Strategies for Improving Non-Visual Access to Cooking Instructions
Franklin Mingzhe Li, Ashley Wang, Patrick Carrington, Shaun K. Kane
Cooking is an essential activity that enhances quality of life by enabling individuals to prepare their own meals. However, cooking often requires multitasking between cooking tasks and following instructions, which can be challenging to cooks with vision impairments if recipes or other instructions are inaccessible. To explore the practices and challenges of recipe access while cooking, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 people with vision impairments who have cooking experience and four cooking instructors at a vision rehabilitation center. We also asked participants to edit and give feedback on existing recipes. We revealed unique practices and challenges to accessing recipe information at different cooking stages, such as the heavy burden of hand-washing to interact with recipe readers. We also presented the preferred information representation and structure of recipes. We then highlighted design features of technological supports that could facilitate the development of more accessible kitchen technologies for recipe access. Our work contributes nuanced insights and design guidelines to enhance recipe accessibility for people with vision impairments.
Read more7/30/2024
🤿
0
Accessibility evaluation of major assistive mobile applications available for the visually impaired
Saidarshan Bhagat, Padmaja Joshi, Avinash Agarwal, Shubhanshu Gupta
People with visual impairments face numerous challenges in their daily lives, including mobility, access to information, independent living, and employment. Artificial Intelligence (AI) with Computer Vision (CV) has the potential to improve their daily lives, provide them with necessary independence, and it will also spawn new opportunities in education and employment. However, while many such AI/CV-based mobile applications are now available, these apps are still not the preferred choice amongst visually impaired persons and are generally limited to advanced users only, due to certain limitations. This study evaluates the challenges faced by visually impaired persons when using AI/CV-based mobile apps. Four popular AI/CV- based apps, namely Seeing AI, Supersense, Envision and Lookout, are assessed by blind and low-vision users. Hence these mobile applications are evaluated on a set of parameters, including generic parameters based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and specific parameters related to mobile app testing. The evaluation not only focused on the guidelines but also on the feedback that was gathered from these users on parameters covering the apps' accuracy, response time, reliability, accessibility, privacy, energy efficiency and usability. The paper also identifies the areas of improvement in the development and innovation of these assistive apps. This work will help developers create better accessible AI-based apps for the visually impaired.
Read more7/26/2024
✅
0
Sign Language-Based versus Touch-Based Input for Deaf Users with Interactive Personal Assistants in Simulated Kitchen Environments
Paige DeVries, Nina Tran, Keith Delk, Melanie Miga, Richard Taulbee, Pranav Pidathala, Abraham Glasser, Raja Kushlanagar, Christian Vogler
In this study, we assess the usability of interactive personal assistants (IPAs), such as Amazon Alexa, in a simulated kitchen smart home environment, with deaf and hard of hearing users. Participants engage in activities in a way that causes their hands to get dirty. With these dirty hands, they are tasked with two different input methods for IPAs: American Sign Language (ASL) in a Wizard-of-Oz design, and smart home apps with a touchscreen. Usability ratings show that participants significantly preferred ASL over touch-based apps with dirty hands, although not to a larger extent than in comparable previous work with clean hands. Participants also expressed significant enthusiasm for ASL-based IPA interaction in Netpromoter scores and in questions about their overall preferences. Preliminary observations further suggest that having dirty hands may affect the way people sign, which may pose challenges for building IPAs that natively support sign language input.
Read more4/24/2024