See Spot Guide: Accessible Interfaces for an Assistive Quadruped Robot

Read original: arXiv:2402.11125 - Published 6/10/2024 by Rayna Hata, Narit Trikasemsak, Andrea Giudice, Stacy A. Doore
Total Score

0

See Spot Guide: Accessible Interfaces for an Assistive Quadruped Robot

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an accessible interface for a quadruped assistive robot called "See Spot" that is designed to help people who are blind or have low vision (BLV).
  • The researchers used a co-design approach, working closely with BLV users to understand their needs and preferences for interacting with the robot.
  • The interface includes features like auditory feedback, haptic controls, and smartphone-based interaction to enable BLV users to effectively command and control the robot.
  • The researchers conducted user studies to evaluate the usability and accessibility of the interface, and found it significantly improved task performance and user satisfaction compared to a traditional gamepad interface.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes an accessible interface for a robotic "helper dog" called See Spot that is designed to assist people who are blind or have low vision (BLV). Instead of a traditional gamepad controller, the researchers worked directly with BLV users to co-design an interface that relies more on sound and touch.

For example, the interface provides audio feedback to let users know what the robot is doing, and allows them to control the robot using touch-based controls on a smartphone rather than complicated button layouts. The goal was to make it easier and more intuitive for BLV users to command and interact with the robot assistant.

The researchers tested this accessible interface with BLV participants and found that it significantly improved their ability to complete tasks and overall satisfaction, compared to using a standard gamepad. This suggests that co-designing technology with the end-users who will be using it, rather than just guessing at their needs, can lead to much more usable and inclusive systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the design and evaluation of an accessible interface for a quadruped assistive robot called "See Spot" that is targeted at users who are blind or have low vision (BLV).

The researchers used a co-design approach, working closely with BLV users to understand their needs and preferences for interacting with the robot. This informed the design of the interface, which includes:

  • Auditory feedback to convey information about the robot's state and actions
  • Haptic controls on a smartphone for commanding the robot
  • Speech-based interaction for issuing high-level commands

The researchers conducted user studies to evaluate the usability and accessibility of the interface, comparing it to a traditional gamepad-based control scheme. They found that the accessible interface significantly improved task performance and user satisfaction for BLV participants, compared to the gamepad.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study of an accessible interface for a quadruped assistive robot. The co-design approach with BLV users is a particular strength, as it helps ensure the interface is truly tailored to their needs and preferences.

One potential limitation is the relatively small sample size of the user study (12 participants). While the results are promising, a larger-scale evaluation would help confirm the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the paper does not address long-term usage or how the interface might need to adapt as users become more familiar with the system.

Further research could also explore integrating language-based interaction to allow for more natural and flexible commands, or combining the accessible interface with autonomous navigation to reduce the cognitive load on users.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards making robotic assistants more inclusive and accessible for people with visual impairments.

Conclusion

This paper presents an accessible interface for a quadruped assistive robot called See Spot, designed in collaboration with users who are blind or have low vision. The interface leverages auditory feedback, haptic controls, and smartphone-based interaction to enable BLV users to effectively command and control the robot.

User studies showed that this accessible interface significantly improved task performance and user satisfaction compared to a traditional gamepad-based control scheme. This highlights the value of co-designing technology with end-users, rather than making assumptions about their needs and preferences.

The work represents an important step towards making robotic assistants more inclusive and accessible for people with visual impairments. Further research could explore ways to enhance the interface, such as integrating language-based interaction and autonomous navigation, to continue improving the user experience.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

See Spot Guide: Accessible Interfaces for an Assistive Quadruped Robot
Total Score

0

See Spot Guide: Accessible Interfaces for an Assistive Quadruped Robot

Rayna Hata, Narit Trikasemsak, Andrea Giudice, Stacy A. Doore

While there is no replacement for the learned expertise, devotion, and social benefits of a guide dog, there are cases in which a robot navigation assistant could be helpful for individuals with blindness or low vision (BLV). This study investigated the potential for an industrial agile robot to perform guided navigation tasks. We developed two interface prototypes that allowed for spatial information between a human-robot pair: a voice-based app and a flexible, responsive handle. The participants (n=21) completed simple navigation tasks and a post-study survey about the prototype functionality and their trust in the robot. All participants successfully completed the navigation tasks and demonstrated the interface prototypes were able to pass spatial information between the human and the robot. Future work will include expanding the voice-based app to allow the robot to communicate obstacles to the handler and adding haptic signals to the handle design.

Read more

6/10/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Can ChatGPT assist visually impaired people with micro-navigation?

Junxian He, Shrinivas Pundlik, Gang Luo

Objective: Micro-navigation poses challenges for blind and visually impaired individuals. They often need to ask for sighted assistance. We explored the feasibility of utilizing ChatGPT as a virtual assistant to provide navigation directions. Methods: We created a test set of outdoor and indoor micro-navigation scenarios consisting of 113 scene images and their human-generated text descriptions. A total of 412 way-finding queries and their expected responses were compiled based on the scenarios. Not all queries are answerable based on the information available in the scene image. I do not knowresponse was expected for unanswerable queries, which served as negative cases. High level orientation responses were expected, and step-by-step guidance was not required. ChatGPT 4o was evaluated based on sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) under different conditions. Results: The default ChatGPT 4o, with scene images as inputs, resulted in SEN and SPE values of 64.8% and 75.9%, respectively. Instruction on how to respond to unanswerable questions did not improve SEN substantially but SPE increased by around 14 percentage points. SEN and SPE both improved substantially, by about 17 and 16 percentage points on average respectively, when human written descriptions of the scenes were provided as input instead of images. Providing further prompt instructions to the assistants when the input was text description did not substantially change the SEN and SPE values. Conclusion: Current native ChatGPT 4o is still unable to provide correct micro-navigation guidance in some cases, probably because its scene understanding is not optimized for navigation purposes. If multi-modal chatbots could interpret scenes with a level of clarity comparable to humans, and also guided by appropriate prompts, they may have the potential to provide assistance to visually impaired for micro-navigation.

Read more

8/19/2024

Follow me: an architecture for user identification and social navigation with a mobile robot
Total Score

0

Follow me: an architecture for user identification and social navigation with a mobile robot

Andrea Ruo, Lorenzo Sabattini, Valeria Villani

Over the past decade, a multitude of service robots have been developed to fulfill a wide range of practical purposes. Notably, roles such as reception and robotic guidance have garnered extensive popularity. In these positions, robots are progressively assuming the responsibilities traditionally held by human staff in assisting customers. Ensuring the safe and socially acceptable operation of robots in such environments poses a fundamental challenge within the context of Socially Responsible Navigation (SRN). This article presents an architecture for user identification and social navigation with a mobile robot that employs computer vision, machine learning, and artificial intelligence algorithms to identify and guide users in a social navigation context, thereby providing an intuitive and user-friendly experience with the robot.

Read more

5/3/2024

Total Score

0

You'll Never Walk Alone: An Experiment on Controlling the Mobile Robot 'Spot' with Voice and Gestures

Renchi Zhang, Jesse van der Linden, Dimitra Dodou, Harleigh Seyffert, Yke Bauke Eisma, Joost C. F. de Winter

Robots are becoming increasingly intelligent and can autonomously perform tasks such as navigating between locations. However, human oversight remains crucial. This study compared two hands-free methods for directing mobile robots: voice control and gesture control. These methods were tested with the human stationary and walking freely. We hypothesized that walking with the robot would lead to higher intuitiveness ratings and better task performance due to increased stimulus-response compatibility, assuming humans align themselves with the robot. In a 2x2 within-subject design, 218 participants guided the quadrupedal robot Spot using 90 degrees rotation and walk-forward commands. After each trial, participants rated the intuitiveness of the command mapping, while post-experiment interviews were used to gather the participants' preferences. Results showed that voice control combined with walking with Spot was the most favored and intuitive, while gesture control while standing caused confusion for left/right commands. Despite this, 29% of participants preferred gesture control, citing task engagement and visual congruence as reasons. An odometry-based analysis revealed that participants aligned behind Spot, particularly in the gesture control condition, when allowed to walk. In conclusion, voice control with walking produced the best outcomes. Improving physical ergonomics and adjusting gesture types could improve the effectiveness of gesture control.

Read more

7/18/2024